| Literature DB >> 27708695 |
Kaoru Seike1, Michiko Nakazato1, Hisashi Hanazawa2, Toshiyuki Ohtani3, Tomihisa Niitsu4, Shin-Ichi Ishikawa5, Atsuko Ayabe6, Ryoko Otani6, Kentaro Kawabe7, Fumie Horiuchi7, Shizuo Takamiya8, Ryoichi Sakuta6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The lowering of the age of onset and chronicity have been key problems related to eating disorders (EDs). As the proportion of teens in the estimated onset ages has increased, it has become important to detect students with EDs and to clarify how they can be supported. Though epidemiological surveys of Yogo teachers (school nurse/health science teachers) have been conducted to inquire about the number of such students, none of these were done according to ED type based on DSM-5. Thus, we conducted a wide area survey in Japan with the goal of proposing a better framework of support for Yogo teachers in their efforts to care for students with EDs.Entities:
Keywords: DSM-5; Eating disorder; Support; Surveillance; Yogo teacher
Year: 2016 PMID: 27708695 PMCID: PMC5041275 DOI: 10.1186/s13030-016-0079-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biopsychosoc Med ISSN: 1751-0759
Fig. 1Characteristics of survey areas. Note) Population densities were calculated from data by [42] and [43]. : government‐ordinance‐designated city
Attributes of Yogo teachers (n = 1,886)
|
| % | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Location | Government Ordinance Designated City | 344 | 19.4 |
| Other Area | 1428 | 80.6 | |
| Missing | 114 | - | |
| School Type | Elementary school | 1037 | 55.8 |
| Junior high school | 529 | 28.4 | |
| Senior high school | 206 | 11.1 | |
| Special needs school | 80 | 4.3 | |
| Missing | 26 | - | |
| Number of Students | 1–60 | 160 | 8.7 |
| 61–200 | 333 | 18.2 | |
| 201–400 | 481 | 26.3 | |
| 401–600 | 375 | 20.5 | |
| 601–800 | 236 | 12.9 | |
| 801–1000 | 193 | 10.5 | |
| 1001+ | 54 | 2.9 | |
| Missing | 54 | - | |
| Years of Experience | 1–5 | 335 | 18.0 |
| 6–10 | 227 | 12.2 | |
| 11–20 | 299 | 16.1 | |
| 20–38 | 999 | 53.7 | |
| Missing | 26 | - | |
| Nursing Experience | Experienced | 149 | 8.0 |
| Not experienced | 1718 | 92.0 | |
| Missing | 19 | - |
Note: % was calculated without missing values (effective %)
Amount of ED knowledge of Yogo teachers (n = 1,886)
| AN | BN | BED | ARFID | Others | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amount of Knowledge |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| Know well | 206 | 15.0 | 139 | 10.2 | 75 | 5.5 | 26 | 1.9 | 11 | 1.0 |
| Know roughly | 968 | 70.7 | 955 | 69.9 | 755 | 55.5 | 325 | 23.9 | 165 | 15.0 |
| Do not know well | 184 | 13.4 | 261 | 19.1 | 502 | 36.9 | 800 | 58.8 | 647 | 58.9 |
| Do not know anything | 11 | 0.8 | 12 | 0.9 | 28 | 2.1 | 209 | 15.4 | 275 | 25.0 |
| Missing | 517 | - | 519 | - | 526 | - | 526 | - | 788 | - |
Encounter rates for each ED type
| ED Type |
| Encounter rate (95 % CI) |
|---|---|---|
| AN | 850 | 0.451 (0.428–0.473) |
| BN | 274 | 0.145 (0.129–0.161) |
| BED | 148 | 0.078 (0.066–0.091) |
| ARFID | 246 | 0.130 (0.115–0.146) |
| Others | 102 | 0.054 (0.044–0.064) |
Note: N = 1,886, n = number of Yogo teachers who encountered students with this type of ED
Fig. 2Encounter rates for each ED type (95 % CI)
Factors affecting the encounter rate (By ED type)
| AN ( | BN ( | BED ( | ARFID ( | Others ( | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Factor | Level | n0/n1 (%) |
| n0/n1 (%) |
| n0/n1 (%) |
| n0/n1 (%) |
| n0/n1 (%) |
|
| Location | Other Area | 606/1325 (45.7 %) | 1.00 | 209/1208 (17.3 %) | 1.00 | 106/1132 (9.4 %) | 1.00 | 173/1063 (16.3 %) | 1.00 | 73/927 (7.9 %) | 1.00 |
| Government Ordinance Designated City | 192/329 (58.4 %) | 1.51* | 53/273 (19.4 %) | 1.19 | 28/239 (11.7 %) | 1.20 | 63/241 (26.1 %) | 1.68* | 26/202 (12.9 %) | 1.55 | |
| School Type | Elementary school | 309/964 (32.1 %) | 1.00 | 65/911 (7.1 %) | 1.00 | 39/870 (4.5 %) | 1.00 | 130/844 (15.4 %) | 1.00 | 45/722 (6.2 %) | 1.00 |
| Junior high school | 337/494 (68.2 %) | 4.42*** | 88/386 (22.8 %) | 3.62*** | 49/361 (13.6 %) | 3.03*** | 74/334 (22.2 %) | 1.46 | 31/293 (10.6 %) | 1.43 | |
| Senior high school | 156/196 (79.6 %) | 6.56*** | 98/172 (57.0 %) | 15.2*** | 46/134 (34.3 %) | 12.8*** | 31/121 (25.6 %) | 1.82 | 7/93 (7.5 %) | 1.00 | |
| Special needs school | 34/75 (45.3 %) | 2.61** | 17/69 (24.6 %) | 6.79*** | 11/65 (16.9 %) | 8.63*** | 8/61 (13.1 %) | 1.03 | 18/58 (31.0 %) | 9.21*** | |
| Number of Students | - | 1.00*** | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | |||||
| Years of Experience | - | 1.05*** | 1.04*** | 1.05*** | 1.03** | 1.03* | |||||
| Nursing Experience | no | 771/1601 (48.2 %) | 1.00 | 239/1428 (16.7 %) | 1.00 | 130/1333 (9.8 %) | 1.00 | 231/1271 (18.2 %) | 1.00 | 90/1086 (8.3 %) | 1.00 |
| yes | 74/140 (52.9 %) | 0.86 | 31/121 (25.6 %) | 0.95 | 17/106 (16.0 %) | 1.11 | 14/97 (14.4 %) | 0.85 | 11/87 (12.6 %) | 0.74 | |
| Knowledge (ED) | 1–4 | 2.59*** | 2.84*** | 3.35*** | 4.23*** | 3.81*** | |||||
Note: *p < .05, **p < .01, ***p < .001. OR: Odds Ratio. n0/n1 = number of Yogo teachers who encountered ED/number of Yogo teachers = encounter rate Response variable = experience encountering ED students for each ED type (yes/no)