| Literature DB >> 27708623 |
Jayeeta Sarkar1, Sufia K Kazy2, Abhishek Gupta1, Avishek Dutta3, Balaram Mohapatra1, Ajoy Roy2, Paramita Bera4, Adinpunya Mitra4, Pinaki Sar1.
Abstract
class="Chemical">Nutrieclass="Chemical">nt deficieclass="Chemical">ncy severely impairs the catabolic activity of iclass="Chemical">ndigeclass="Chemical">nous microorgaclass="Chemical">nisms iclass="Chemical">nEntities:
Keywords: bioremediation; biostimulation; microbial community; next generation sequencing; petroleum refinery sludge
Year: 2016 PMID: 27708623 PMCID: PMC5030240 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Microcosm setup for biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons.
| Microcosm designation | NaNO3 as N source | K2HPO4 as P source | Surfactant (Tween 20) | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | - | - | - | Control to account for abiotic losses |
| U | - | - | - | Control for natural attenuation |
| N | + | - | - | N amendment |
| P | - | + | - | P amendment |
| NP | + | + | - | N and P amendment |
| Surf | - | - | + | Surfactant as an aid to bioremediation |
| NS | + | - | + | N and surfactant amendment |
| PS | - | + | + | P and surfactant amendment |
| NPS | + | + | + | Biostimulation (N and P) and surfactant |
Details of the primers used with PCR cycle conditions∗.
| Gene | Primers (5′-3′) | Size (bp) | Annealing temperature (°C) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| alkB | F(AAYACNGCNCAYGARCTNGGNCAYAA) | 550 | 53 | |
| R(GCRTGRTGRTCIGARTGICGYTG) | ||||
| bssA | 7772f (GAC ATG ACC GAC GCS ATY CT) | 794 | 50–55 | |
| 8546r (TCG TCG TCR TTG CCC CAY TT) | ||||
| ME1(GCMATGCARATHGGWATGTC) | 790 | 50–55 | ||
| ME2(TCATKGCRTAGTTDGGRTAGT) | ||||
| H3(ATR TTR TTN GCN GCR TA) | 330 | 45–50 | ||
| H4(TTY TAY GGN AAR GGN GG) | ||||
| S1F(CCTAYTGGCCGCCRCART) | 890 | 40–45 | ||
| S6R (CGTTGAACTTRCCGGT) | ||||
| p2060F (CAACATCGTYCAYACCCAGGG) | 450 | 55 | ||
| 4R (5′-GTGTAGCAGTTACC GCA-3′) | ||||
| 1960f (TAYGTSGGCCARGARAA) | 650 | 55–59 | ||
| 2659r (TTYTCRTACCABGTBGC) | ||||
| F1(GCNTGYTGGWSNTGYAA) | 520 | 50–55 | ||
| 7R1 (TWNGGCATRTGRCARTC) | ||||
Physico-chemical and microbiological characterization of oily sludge sample.
| Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| pH | 6–6.5 |
| Temperature (°C) | 44.9 |
| Dissolved oxygen (mg/l) | 0.19 |
| Oxidation reduction potential (mV) | -30 |
| Conductivity (μ Siemens/cm) | 1.4 |
| Moisture content (%) | 9 |
| Oil and gas content (%, w/w) | 90.3 |
| Total organic carbon (TOC) (g/kg) | 200 ± 105.2 |
| TPH (g/kg) | 400 ± 47.22 |
| Nitrate (mg/kg) | 7.875 ± 4.62 |
| Ammonium (mg/kg) | 17 ± 5.33 |
| Nitrite (mg/kg) | <2.0 |
| Chloride (mg/kg) | 469.85 |
| Sulfate (mg/kg) | 73.61 |
| Phosphate (mg/kg) | 35 ± 10 |
| As (mg/kg) | 1.279 ± 1.25 |
| Cd (mg/kg) | 0.16 ± 1.91 |
| Co (mg/kg) | 2.39 ± 1.68 |
| Cr (mg/kg) | 8.07 ± 1.39 |
| Fe (mg/kg) | 302.97 ± 2.56 |
| Na (mg/kg) | 2.23 ± 2.11 |
| Ni (mg/kg) | 7.11 ± 1.63 |
| Pb (mg/kg) | 4.02 ± 2.5 |
| V (mg/kg) | 2.84 ± 1.69 |
| Zn (mg/kg) | 131 ± 2.02 |
| Aerobic in R2A medium | 5–8 × 106 |
| Anaerobic agar medium | 2 × 102 |
| Aliphatics (%) | 95.52 |
| Aromatics (%) | 4.48 |
Carbon chain length distribution in original (0 time), unamended (U) and N amended samples after 30, 60, and 90 days of incubation, quantified through GC-FID.
| Carbon chain length distribution | Relative percent abundance of hydrocarbons (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GR3 | U_30 | U-60 | U_90 | N_30 | N_60 | N_90 | |
| <C12 | 10.76 | 18.39 | 18.83 | 22.28 | 14.72 | 33.47 | 42.98 |
| C12-20 | 35.86 | 40.29 | 39.91 | 38.16 | 48.23 | 23.55 | 41.99 |
| C20-28 | 42.82 | 31.95 | 33.51 | 32.11 | 30.34 | 36.41 | 11.29 |
| >C28 | 10.48 | 9.47 | 7.62 | 7.5 | 7.44 | 6.39 | 3.8 |
| 0.8506 | 0.899 | ND | 1.079 | ∞ | ND | ∞ | |
Total reads and OTU distribution between four samples obtained through next generation sequencing (Ion-Torrent PGM), diversity indices (calculated using QIIME workflow), taxonomical distribution and functional genes detected (Table ).
| Sample_ID | GR3 | U | N | NS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of reads | 577595 | 45322 | 149031 | 196616 |
| OTUs (97% identity) | 9449 | 2584 | 2696 | 2652 |
| Estimated total OTUs (Chao1) | 18441.06 | 6323.026 | 5548.731 | 4972.729 |
| Shannon evenness index | 5.55 | 5.53 | 3.79 | 3.31 |
| Simpson index | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.69 |
| Equitability | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.33 | 0.29 |
| Goods coverage | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Archaeal taxa (% Reads) | 17.31 | 0.23 | 2.80 | 5.80 |
| Bacterial taxa (% Reads) | 82.03 | 99.70 | 97.18 | 94.20 |
| Phylum | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Class | 9 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Family | 14 | 5 | 6 | 10 |
| Genus | 13 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| Phylum | 45 | 36 | 29 | 34 |
| Class | 94 | 53 | 42 | 60 |
| Family | 184 | 95 | 82 | 137 |
| Genus | 259 | 105 | 87 | 192 |
| + | + | + | ND | |
| + | + | + | ND | |
| + | + | + | ND | |
| + | + | + | ND | |
| + | ND | + | ND | |
| + | ND | + | ND | |
| + | ND | + | ND | |
| + | ND | + | ND | |
Comparison of bioremediation performance for very high TPH content oily sludges (including our sample).
| Sl No | Initial TPH concentration (g kg-1) | Nature of contamination | Remediation approach | Percentage TPH reduction (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 400 | Refinery sludge from waste lagoon | Biostimulation | >80% within 90 days | This study |
| 2 | 160.30 – 372.50 | Refinery oily sludge | Bioaugmentation with microbial consortia | Upto 95% within 2–12 months | |
| 3 | 370 | Refinery sludge | Bioaugmentation and composting | Upto 46–53% degradation within 56 days | |
| 4 | 334 | Oil sludge from a natural gas processing facility | Biostimulation by balancing C:N:P ratio using inorganic nutrients | Upto 32–51% after 30 days with C/N/P ratio of 100/1.74/0.5. | |
| 5 | 110 | Oil tank bottom sludge | Combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation (fungal-nutrient amendment) | Upto 91% degradation | |
| 6 | 300 | Contaminated soil from refinery | Biopile biostimulation | 60% degradation in 3 months | |
| 7 | 220 | Bottom sludge of oil separating tank | Bioaugmentation ( | Upto 80.6% within 1-year | |
| 8 | 130 | Weathered oily waste (PB401) from a 10 years old disposal site | Slurry based bioaugmentation and biostimulation | Upto 24% biostimulation | |
| 9 | 99.2 | Artficial contamination with Barauni refinery sludge, Bihar, India | Bioaugmentation [ | Upto 90.2% within 120 days | |
| 10 | 250 | Oil sludge contaminated soil | Biostimulation using manure | Upto 58.2% in 360 days | |
| 11 | 15–80 | Oily sludge | Biostimulation with inorganic nutrients | Upto 70–90% during 2 months | |
| 12 | 22–55 | Sediment samples from oil contaminated land | Biostimulation and bioaugmentation | C14–23, 46–67% in presence of inorganic nutrients with or without bacteria within 90 days | |
| 13 | 25 | Crude oil contaminate soil samples | Microcosms with artificially contaminated sample with biostimulation and bioaugmentation techniques | 80% with combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation in 28 weeks | |
| 14 | 14 | Contaminated soil sample from oil storage site | Combined bioaugmentation and bioaugmentation (consortia: | Upto 80% (reduced from 14 to 2) within 140 days | |
| 15 | 13 | Diesel contaminated site | Biopile with the aid of biostimulation | Upto 85% in 76 days | |
| 16 | 10.4 | Industrial site contaminated by progressive leakage | Oxygen biostimulation in column fixed bed reactor | Upto C12–20, 80% C21–35 38%, C35–40 44%. within 2 y | |