| Literature DB >> 27708623 |
Jayeeta Sarkar1, Sufia K Kazy2, Abhishek Gupta1, Avishek Dutta3, Balaram Mohapatra1, Ajoy Roy2, Paramita Bera4, Adinpunya Mitra4, Pinaki Sar1.
Abstract
Nutrient deficiency severely impairs the catabolic activity of indigenous microorganisms in hydrocarbon rich environments (HREs) and limits the rate of intrinsic bioremediation. The present study aimed to characterize the microbial community in refinery waste and evaluate the scope for biostimulation based in situ bioremediation. Samples recovered from the wastewater lagoon of Guwahati refinery revealed a hydrocarbon enriched [high total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH)], oxygen-, moisture-limited, reducing environment. Intrinsic biodegradation ability of the indigenous microorganisms was enhanced significantly (>80% reduction in TPH by 90 days) with nitrate amendment. Preferred utilization of both higher- (>C30) and middle- chain (C20-30) length hydrocarbons were evident from GC-MS analysis. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis and community level physiological profiling analyses indicated distinct shift in community's composition and metabolic abilities following nitrogen (N) amendment. High throughput deep sequencing of 16S rRNA gene showed that the native community was mainly composed of hydrocarbon degrading, syntrophic, methanogenic, nitrate/iron/sulfur reducing facultative anaerobic bacteria and archaebacteria, affiliated to γ- and δ-Proteobacteria and Euryarchaeota respectively. Genes for aerobic and anaerobic alkane metabolism (alkB and bssA), methanogenesis (mcrA), denitrification (nirS and narG) and N2 fixation (nifH) were detected. Concomitant to hydrocarbon degradation, lowering of dissolve O2 and increase in oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) marked with an enrichment of N2 fixing, nitrate reducing aerobic/facultative anaerobic members [e.g., Azovibrio, Pseudoxanthomonas and Comamonadaceae members] was evident in N amended microcosm. This study highlighted that indigenous community of refinery sludge was intrinsically diverse, yet appreciable rate of in situ bioremediation could be achieved by supplying adequate N sources.Entities:
Keywords: bioremediation; biostimulation; microbial community; next generation sequencing; petroleum refinery sludge
Year: 2016 PMID: 27708623 PMCID: PMC5030240 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01407
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Microcosm setup for biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons.
| Microcosm designation | NaNO3 as N source | K2HPO4 as P source | Surfactant (Tween 20) | Treatment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | - | - | - | Control to account for abiotic losses |
| U | - | - | - | Control for natural attenuation |
| N | + | - | - | N amendment |
| P | - | + | - | P amendment |
| NP | + | + | - | N and P amendment |
| Surf | - | - | + | Surfactant as an aid to bioremediation |
| NS | + | - | + | N and surfactant amendment |
| PS | - | + | + | P and surfactant amendment |
| NPS | + | + | + | Biostimulation (N and P) and surfactant |
Details of the primers used with PCR cycle conditions∗.
| Gene | Primers (5′-3′) | Size (bp) | Annealing temperature (°C) | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| alkB | F(AAYACNGCNCAYGARCTNGGNCAYAA) | 550 | 53 | |
| R(GCRTGRTGRTCIGARTGICGYTG) | ||||
| bssA | 7772f (GAC ATG ACC GAC GCS ATY CT) | 794 | 50–55 | |
| 8546r (TCG TCG TCR TTG CCC CAY TT) | ||||
| ME1(GCMATGCARATHGGWATGTC) | 790 | 50–55 | ||
| ME2(TCATKGCRTAGTTDGGRTAGT) | ||||
| H3(ATR TTR TTN GCN GCR TA) | 330 | 45–50 | ||
| H4(TTY TAY GGN AAR GGN GG) | ||||
| S1F(CCTAYTGGCCGCCRCART) | 890 | 40–45 | ||
| S6R (CGTTGAACTTRCCGGT) | ||||
| p2060F (CAACATCGTYCAYACCCAGGG) | 450 | 55 | ||
| 4R (5′-GTGTAGCAGTTACC GCA-3′) | ||||
| 1960f (TAYGTSGGCCARGARAA) | 650 | 55–59 | ||
| 2659r (TTYTCRTACCABGTBGC) | ||||
| F1(GCNTGYTGGWSNTGYAA) | 520 | 50–55 | ||
| 7R1 (TWNGGCATRTGRCARTC) | ||||
Physico-chemical and microbiological characterization of oily sludge sample.
| Parameters | Values |
|---|---|
| pH | 6–6.5 |
| Temperature (°C) | 44.9 |
| Dissolved oxygen (mg/l) | 0.19 |
| Oxidation reduction potential (mV) | -30 |
| Conductivity (μ Siemens/cm) | 1.4 |
| Moisture content (%) | 9 |
| Oil and gas content (%, w/w) | 90.3 |
| Total organic carbon (TOC) (g/kg) | 200 ± 105.2 |
| TPH (g/kg) | 400 ± 47.22 |
| Nitrate (mg/kg) | 7.875 ± 4.62 |
| Ammonium (mg/kg) | 17 ± 5.33 |
| Nitrite (mg/kg) | <2.0 |
| Chloride (mg/kg) | 469.85 |
| Sulfate (mg/kg) | 73.61 |
| Phosphate (mg/kg) | 35 ± 10 |
| As (mg/kg) | 1.279 ± 1.25 |
| Cd (mg/kg) | 0.16 ± 1.91 |
| Co (mg/kg) | 2.39 ± 1.68 |
| Cr (mg/kg) | 8.07 ± 1.39 |
| Fe (mg/kg) | 302.97 ± 2.56 |
| Na (mg/kg) | 2.23 ± 2.11 |
| Ni (mg/kg) | 7.11 ± 1.63 |
| Pb (mg/kg) | 4.02 ± 2.5 |
| V (mg/kg) | 2.84 ± 1.69 |
| Zn (mg/kg) | 131 ± 2.02 |
| Aerobic in R2A medium | 5–8 × 106 |
| Anaerobic agar medium | 2 × 102 |
| Aliphatics (%) | 95.52 |
| Aromatics (%) | 4.48 |
Carbon chain length distribution in original (0 time), unamended (U) and N amended samples after 30, 60, and 90 days of incubation, quantified through GC-FID.
| Carbon chain length distribution | Relative percent abundance of hydrocarbons (%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GR3 | U_30 | U-60 | U_90 | N_30 | N_60 | N_90 | |
| <C12 | 10.76 | 18.39 | 18.83 | 22.28 | 14.72 | 33.47 | 42.98 |
| C12-20 | 35.86 | 40.29 | 39.91 | 38.16 | 48.23 | 23.55 | 41.99 |
| C20-28 | 42.82 | 31.95 | 33.51 | 32.11 | 30.34 | 36.41 | 11.29 |
| >C28 | 10.48 | 9.47 | 7.62 | 7.5 | 7.44 | 6.39 | 3.8 |
| 0.8506 | 0.899 | ND | 1.079 | ∞ | ND | ∞ | |
Total reads and OTU distribution between four samples obtained through next generation sequencing (Ion-Torrent PGM), diversity indices (calculated using QIIME workflow), taxonomical distribution and functional genes detected (Table ).
| Sample_ID | GR3 | U | N | NS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Number of reads | 577595 | 45322 | 149031 | 196616 |
| OTUs (97% identity) | 9449 | 2584 | 2696 | 2652 |
| Estimated total OTUs (Chao1) | 18441.06 | 6323.026 | 5548.731 | 4972.729 |
| Shannon evenness index | 5.55 | 5.53 | 3.79 | 3.31 |
| Simpson index | 0.90 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.69 |
| Equitability | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.33 | 0.29 |
| Goods coverage | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.99 |
| Archaeal taxa (% Reads) | 17.31 | 0.23 | 2.80 | 5.80 |
| Bacterial taxa (% Reads) | 82.03 | 99.70 | 97.18 | 94.20 |
| Phylum | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 |
| Class | 9 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Family | 14 | 5 | 6 | 10 |
| Genus | 13 | 4 | 5 | 10 |
| Phylum | 45 | 36 | 29 | 34 |
| Class | 94 | 53 | 42 | 60 |
| Family | 184 | 95 | 82 | 137 |
| Genus | 259 | 105 | 87 | 192 |
| + | + | + | ND | |
| + | + | + | ND | |
| + | + | + | ND | |
| + | + | + | ND | |
| + | ND | + | ND | |
| + | ND | + | ND | |
| + | ND | + | ND | |
| + | ND | + | ND | |
Comparison of bioremediation performance for very high TPH content oily sludges (including our sample).
| Sl No | Initial TPH concentration (g kg-1) | Nature of contamination | Remediation approach | Percentage TPH reduction (%) | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 400 | Refinery sludge from waste lagoon | Biostimulation | >80% within 90 days | This study |
| 2 | 160.30 – 372.50 | Refinery oily sludge | Bioaugmentation with microbial consortia | Upto 95% within 2–12 months | |
| 3 | 370 | Refinery sludge | Bioaugmentation and composting | Upto 46–53% degradation within 56 days | |
| 4 | 334 | Oil sludge from a natural gas processing facility | Biostimulation by balancing C:N:P ratio using inorganic nutrients | Upto 32–51% after 30 days with C/N/P ratio of 100/1.74/0.5. | |
| 5 | 110 | Oil tank bottom sludge | Combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation (fungal-nutrient amendment) | Upto 91% degradation | |
| 6 | 300 | Contaminated soil from refinery | Biopile biostimulation | 60% degradation in 3 months | |
| 7 | 220 | Bottom sludge of oil separating tank | Bioaugmentation ( | Upto 80.6% within 1-year | |
| 8 | 130 | Weathered oily waste (PB401) from a 10 years old disposal site | Slurry based bioaugmentation and biostimulation | Upto 24% biostimulation | |
| 9 | 99.2 | Artficial contamination with Barauni refinery sludge, Bihar, India | Bioaugmentation [ | Upto 90.2% within 120 days | |
| 10 | 250 | Oil sludge contaminated soil | Biostimulation using manure | Upto 58.2% in 360 days | |
| 11 | 15–80 | Oily sludge | Biostimulation with inorganic nutrients | Upto 70–90% during 2 months | |
| 12 | 22–55 | Sediment samples from oil contaminated land | Biostimulation and bioaugmentation | C14–23, 46–67% in presence of inorganic nutrients with or without bacteria within 90 days | |
| 13 | 25 | Crude oil contaminate soil samples | Microcosms with artificially contaminated sample with biostimulation and bioaugmentation techniques | 80% with combined biostimulation and bioaugmentation in 28 weeks | |
| 14 | 14 | Contaminated soil sample from oil storage site | Combined bioaugmentation and bioaugmentation (consortia: | Upto 80% (reduced from 14 to 2) within 140 days | |
| 15 | 13 | Diesel contaminated site | Biopile with the aid of biostimulation | Upto 85% in 76 days | |
| 16 | 10.4 | Industrial site contaminated by progressive leakage | Oxygen biostimulation in column fixed bed reactor | Upto C12–20, 80% C21–35 38%, C35–40 44%. within 2 y | |