Literature DB >> 2770813

How good is peer review?

A S Relman, M Angell.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  1989        PMID： 2770813     DOI： 10.1056/NEJM198909213211211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN： 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


× No keyword cloud information.
  7 in total

Review 1.  Burden of proof: judging science and protecting public health in (and out of) the courtroom.

Authors:  G J Annas
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Recent trends in National Institutes of Health funding of surgical research.

Authors:  Shawn J Rangel; Bradley Efron; R Lawrence Moss
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  Identifying peer-reviewed journals in clinical medicine.

Authors:  J D Eldredge
Journal:  Bull Med Libr Assoc       Date:  1997-10

4.  Editor's report: scientific misconduct and the responsibility of journal editors.

Authors:  A Yankauer
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  From abstract to impact in cardiovascular research: factors predicting publication and citation.

Authors:  Stephan Winnik; Dimitri A Raptis; Janina H Walker; Matthias Hasun; Thimotheus Speer; Pierre-Alain Clavien; Michel Komajda; Jeroen J Bax; Michal Tendera; Kim Fox; Frans Van de Werf; Ciara Mundow; Thomas F Lüscher; Frank Ruschitzka; Christian M Matter
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  A new age of peer reviewed scientific journals.

Authors:  John R Adler
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2012-11-27

Review 7.  Peer review and the publication process.

Authors:  Parveen Azam Ali; Roger Watson
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2016-03-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.