Literature DB >> 27708035

Surface uplift and time-dependent seismic hazard due to fluid injection in eastern Texas.

Manoochehr Shirzaei1, William L Ellsworth2, Kristy F Tiampo3, Pablo J González4, Michael Manga5.   

Abstract

Observations that unequivocally link seismicity and wastewater injection are scarce. Here we show that wastewater injection in eastern Texas causes uplift, detectable in radar interferometric data up to >8 kilometers from the wells. Using measurements of uplift, reported injection data, and a poroelastic model, we computed the crustal strain and pore pressure. We infer that an increase of >1 megapascal in pore pressure in rocks with low compressibility triggers earthquakes, including the 4.8-moment magnitude event that occurred on 17 May 2012, the largest earthquake recorded in eastern Texas. Seismic activity increased even while injection rates declined, owing to diffusion of pore pressure from earlier periods with higher injection rates. Induced seismicity potential is suppressed where tight confining formations prevent pore pressure from propagating into crystalline basement rocks.
Copyright © 2016, American Association for the Advancement of Science.

Year:  2016        PMID: 27708035     DOI: 10.1126/science.aag0262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  9 in total

1.  Modeling Sustainability: Population, Inequality, Consumption, and Bidirectional Coupling of the Earth and Human Systems.

Authors:  Safa Motesharrei; Jorge Rivas; Eugenia Kalnay; Ghassem R Asrar; Antonio J Busalacchi; Robert F Cahalan; Mark A Cane; Rita R Colwell; Kuishuang Feng; Rachel S Franklin; Klaus Hubacek; Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm; Takemasa Miyoshi; Matthias Ruth; Roald Sagdeev; Adel Shirmohammadi; Jagadish Shukla; Jelena Srebric; Victor M Yakovenko; Ning Zeng
Journal:  Natl Sci Rev       Date:  2016-12-11       Impact factor: 17.275

2.  A Simple Relation to Constrain Groundwater Models Using Surface Deformation.

Authors:  Megan R M Brown; Shemin Ge; Elizabeth Screaton
Journal:  Ground Water       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 2.887

3.  Practical Considerations before Installing Ground-Based Geodetic Infrastructure for Integrated InSAR and cGNSS Monitoring of Vertical Land Motion.

Authors:  Amy L Parker; Will E Featherstone; Nigel T Penna; Mick S Filmer; Matt C Garthwaite
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Was the Mw 7.5 1952 Kern County, California, earthquake induced (or triggered)?

Authors:  Susan E Hough; Victor C Tsai; Robert Walker; Fred Aminzadeh
Journal:  J Seismol       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 1.489

5.  Pore-pressure diffusion, enhanced by poroelastic stresses, controls induced seismicity in Oklahoma.

Authors:  Guang Zhai; Manoochehr Shirzaei; Michael Manga; Xiaowei Chen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  No Significant Effect of Coulomb Stress on the Gutenberg-Richter Law after the Landers Earthquake.

Authors:  Víctor Navas-Portella; Abigail Jiménez; Álvaro Corral
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Causal mechanism of injection-induced earthquakes through the Mw 5.5 Pohang earthquake case study.

Authors:  I W Yeo; M R M Brown; S Ge; K K Lee
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Convolutional neural network for earthquake detection and location.

Authors:  Thibaut Perol; Michaël Gharbi; Marine Denolle
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Induced seismicity closed-form traffic light system for actuarial decision-making during deep fluid injections.

Authors:  A Mignan; M Broccardo; S Wiemer; D Giardini
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.