Literature DB >> 27707848

Functional Outcomes After Operative Management of Extra-Articular Glenoid Neck and Scapular Body Fractures.

Lisa K Schroder1, Erich M Gauger1, Jeffrey A Gilbertson1, Peter A Cole2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study's purpose was to assess patient-based functional outcomes following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of displaced scapular body and glenoid neck fractures. This series represents a 9-year experience at a level-I trauma center and referral destination for this injury.
METHODS: A database was established to record surgical and functional outcomes of scapular fractures treated with ORIF. For this report, the cases of all patients who had a glenoid neck or scapular body fracture (AO/OTA 14-A3 or 14-C1) without intra-articular involvement were reviewed. Operative indications included medial/lateral displacement of ≥20 mm, angulation of ≥45°, medial/lateral displacement of ≥15 mm with angulation of ≥30°, double disruptions of the superior shoulder suspensory complex with both displaced ≥10 mm, a glenopolar angle of ≤22°, and an open fracture. The results of clinical testing, including measurements of range of motion and strength and scores on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) and Short Form-36 (SF-36) questionnaires, were recorded at each follow-up appointment.
RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2011, 61 patients with an extra-articular scapular fracture were treated surgically within 20 days after the injury; 19 patients (31%) had ≥2 operative indications. Of the 61 patients, 49 (80%) were followed for ≥1 year (mean, 33 months; range, 12 to 138 months) following surgery. There was a 100% union rate at the time of final follow-up, with a mean DASH score of 12.1 points (range, 0 to 54 points). For all parameters, the mean SF-36 scores of the study patients were comparable with normative population scores. The range of motion of the operatively treated and contralateral shoulders averaged, respectively, 154° and 159° of forward flexion, 106° and 108° of abduction, and 66° and 70° of external rotation. The strength of the operatively treated and contralateral shoulders averaged, respectively, 20 and 23 lb (89.0 and 102.3 N) of force in forward flexion, 14 and 16 lb (62.3 and 71.2 N) in abduction, and 19 and 23 lb (84.5 and 102.3 N) in external rotation. Complications and/or secondary surgery were recorded for 8 patients (16%).
CONCLUSIONS: Displaced scapular body and glenoid neck fractures that meet current published standards for ORIF can be treated operatively with predictably good functional outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Copyright © 2016 by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27707848     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  The Operative Treatment of Scapula Fractures: An Analysis of 10,097 Patients.

Authors:  Wyatt Vander Voort; Brandon Wilkinson; Nicholas Bedard; Nathan Hendrickson; Michael Willey
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2022-06

2.  [Clavicular fractures : Diagnostics, management and treatment].

Authors:  M Wurm; M Beirer; P Biberthaler; C Kirchhoff
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Ring versus non-ring plate for the treatment of displaced scapular body fractures: a retrospective study with a mean follow-up of 5 years.

Authors:  Zheng Yuan; Fan Zhang; Guanzhao Liang; Xianshang Zeng; Dan Liu; Chen Yang; Weiguang Yu; Qiang Zhang; Xinchao Zhang
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 1.671

4.  Functional outcomes of extra-articular scapula fracture fixation with distal humeral Y-type locking plate: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yuanjun Hu; Huiming Shi; Fei Wang; Guangtie Ren; Ruiping Cheng; Zhizhong Zhang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.359

5.  Open Reduction and Internal Fixation of Extraarticular Scapular Neck and Body Fractures With Good Short Term Functional Outcome.

Authors:  Muhammad Azrin Mohd Asihin; Mohd Yazid Bajuri; Premganesh K Ganaisan; Abdul Rauf Ahmad
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2019-12-17

6.  Scapular Fractures at a Level 1 Trauma Center: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Hammam Kayali; Abdulaziz F Ahmed; Talal Ibrahim
Journal:  Qatar Med J       Date:  2022-03-02

7.  [Comparative study of surgical treatments of scapula fracture through the muscle space of rotator cuff approach and Judet approach].

Authors:  Wenqing Tong; Yang Hong; Minghai Wang
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2019-11-15

8.  Can displaced extra-articular fractures of the scapula be stabilized through a direct lateral-column approach.

Authors:  Rejith Mannambeth; Nathan B Kirzner; Ash K Moaveni
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2020-05-18

9.  Functional outcomes and clinical strength assessment after infraspinatus-sparing surgical approach to scapular fracture: Does it really make a difference?

Authors:  Giuseppe Porcellini; Paolo Palladini; Stefano Congia; Alessandro Palmas; Giovanni Merolla; Antonio Capone
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2018-09-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.