Xiaole Su1, Xinfang Xie2, Lijun Liu3, Jicheng Lv2, Fujian Song4, Vlado Perkovic5, Hong Zhang2. 1. Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China; Renal Division, Shanxi Medical University Second Hospital, Shanxi Kidney Disease Institute, Taiyuan, China. 2. Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China. 3. Renal Division, Peking University First Hospital; Peking University Institute of Nephrology; Key Laboratory of Renal Disease, Ministry of Health of China; Key Laboratory of Chronic Kidney Disease Prevention and Treatment (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China. Electronic address: lijun.liu@medmail.com.cn. 4. Department of Population Health & Primary Care, Norwich Medical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom. 5. The George Institute for Global Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To simultaneously evaluate the relative efficacy of multiple pharmacologic strategies for preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury (AKI). STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review containing a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. SETTING & POPULATION: Participants undergoing diagnostic and/or interventional procedures with contrast media. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: Randomized controlled trials comparing the active drug treatments with each other or with hydration alone. INTERVENTION: Any of the following drugs in combination with hydration: N-acetylcysteine (NAC), theophylline (aminophylline), fenoldopam, iloprost, alprostadil, prostaglandin E1, statins, statins plus NAC, bicarbonate sodium, bicarbonate sodium plus NAC, ascorbic acid (vitamin C), tocopherol (vitamin E), α-lipoic acid, atrial natriuretic peptide, B-type natriuretic peptide, and carperitide. OUTCOMES: The occurrence of contrast-induced AKI. RESULTS: The trial network included 150 trials with 31,631 participants and 4,182 contrast-induced AKI events assessing 12 different interventions. Compared to hydration, ORs (95% credible intervals) for contrast-induced AKI were 0.31 (0.14-0.60) for high-dose statin plus NAC, 0.37 (0.19-0.64) for high-dose statin alone, 0.37 (0.17-0.72) for prostaglandins, 0.48 (0.26-0.82) for theophylline, 0.62 (0.40-0.88) for bicarbonate sodium plus NAC, 0.67 (0.54-0.81) for NAC alone, 0.64 (0.41-0.95) for vitamins and analogues, 0.70 (0.29-1.37) for natriuretic peptides, 0.69 (0.31-1.37) for fenoldopam, 0.78 (0.59-1.01) for bicarbonate sodium, and 0.98 (0.41-2.07) for low-dose statin. High-dose statin plus NAC or high-dose statin alone were likely to be ranked the best or the second best for preventing contrast-induced AKI. The overall results were not materially changed in metaregressions or subgroup and sensitivity analyses. LIMITATIONS: Patient-level data were unavailable; unable to include some treatment agents; low event rates; imbalanced distribution of participants among treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose statins plus hydration with or without NAC might be the preferred treatment strategy to prevent contrast-induced AKI in patients undergoing diagnostic and/or interventional procedures requiring contrast media.
BACKGROUND: To simultaneously evaluate the relative efficacy of multiple pharmacologic strategies for preventing contrast-induced acute kidney injury (AKI). STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review containing a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. SETTING & POPULATION: Participants undergoing diagnostic and/or interventional procedures with contrast media. SELECTION CRITERIA FOR STUDIES: Randomized controlled trials comparing the active drug treatments with each other or with hydration alone. INTERVENTION: Any of the following drugs in combination with hydration: N-acetylcysteine (NAC), theophylline (aminophylline), fenoldopam, iloprost, alprostadil, prostaglandin E1, statins, statins plus NAC, bicarbonate sodium, bicarbonate sodium plus NAC, ascorbic acid (vitamin C), tocopherol (vitamin E), α-lipoic acid, atrial natriuretic peptide, B-type natriuretic peptide, and carperitide. OUTCOMES: The occurrence of contrast-induced AKI. RESULTS: The trial network included 150 trials with 31,631 participants and 4,182 contrast-induced AKI events assessing 12 different interventions. Compared to hydration, ORs (95% credible intervals) for contrast-induced AKI were 0.31 (0.14-0.60) for high-dose statin plus NAC, 0.37 (0.19-0.64) for high-dose statin alone, 0.37 (0.17-0.72) for prostaglandins, 0.48 (0.26-0.82) for theophylline, 0.62 (0.40-0.88) for bicarbonate sodium plus NAC, 0.67 (0.54-0.81) for NAC alone, 0.64 (0.41-0.95) for vitamins and analogues, 0.70 (0.29-1.37) for natriuretic peptides, 0.69 (0.31-1.37) for fenoldopam, 0.78 (0.59-1.01) for bicarbonate sodium, and 0.98 (0.41-2.07) for low-dose statin. High-dose statin plus NAC or high-dose statin alone were likely to be ranked the best or the second best for preventing contrast-induced AKI. The overall results were not materially changed in metaregressions or subgroup and sensitivity analyses. LIMITATIONS: Patient-level data were unavailable; unable to include some treatment agents; low event rates; imbalanced distribution of participants among treatment strategies. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose statins plus hydration with or without NAC might be the preferred treatment strategy to prevent contrast-induced AKI in patients undergoing diagnostic and/or interventional procedures requiring contrast media.
Authors: Holger Scholz; Felix J Boivin; Kai M Schmidt-Ott; Sebastian Bachmann; Kai-Uwe Eckardt; Ute I Scholl; Pontus B Persson Journal: Nat Rev Nephrol Date: 2021-02-05 Impact factor: 28.314
Authors: Peter Pickkers; Marlies Ostermann; Michael Joannidis; Alexander Zarbock; Eric Hoste; Rinaldo Bellomo; John Prowle; Michael Darmon; Joseph V Bonventre; Lui Forni; Sean M Bagshaw; Miet Schetz Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-01-30 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Samuel A Silver; Mitra K Nadim; Donal J O'Donoghue; Francis P Wilson; John A Kellum; Ravindra L Mehta; Claudio Ronco; Kianoush Kashani; Mitchell H Rosner; Michael Haase; Andrew J P Lewington Journal: Am J Med Date: 2019-12-10 Impact factor: 4.965
Authors: Eliano P Navarese; Paul A Gurbel; Felicita Andreotti; Michalina Marta Kołodziejczak; Suetonia C Palmer; Sofia Dias; Antonino Buffon; Jacek Kubica; Mariusz Kowalewski; Tomasz Jadczyk; Michał Laskiewicz; Marek Jędrzejek; Maximillian Brockmeyer; Flavio Airoldi; Marinella Ruospo; Stefano De Servi; Wojciech Wojakowski; Christopher O' Connor; Giovanni F M Strippoli Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-02-02 Impact factor: 3.240