| Literature DB >> 27706097 |
Tandeka Magcwebeba1, Pieter Swart2, Sonja Swanevelder3, Elizabeth Joubert4,5, Wentzel Gelderblom6,7.
Abstract
Ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation is one of the major predisposing risk factors of skin cancer. The anticancer and photoprotective effects of unoxidized rooibos (Aspalathus linearis) and honeybush (Cyclopia) herbal teas, containing high levels of dihydrochalones and xanthones, respectively, have been demonstrated in skin cancer models in vivo. In the current study, the anti-inflammatory effects of methanol and aqueous extracts of these herbal teas were investigated in a UVB/HaCaT keratinocyte model with intracellular interleukin-1α (icIL-1α) accumulation as a biomarker. Extracts of green tea (Camellia sinensis) served as benchmark. Both extracts of green tea and rooibos, as well as the aqueous extract of C. intermedia, enhanced UVB-induced inhibition of cell viability, proliferation and induction of apoptosis, facilitating the removal of icIL-1α. The underlying mechanisms may involve mitochondrial dysfunction exhibiting pro-oxidant responses via polyphenol-iron interactions. The methanol extracts of honeybush, however, protected against UVB-induced reduction of cell growth parameters, presumably via antioxidant mechanisms that prevented the removal of highly inflamed icIL-1α-containing keratinocytes via apoptosis. The dual antioxidant and/or pro-oxidant role of the polyphenolic herbal tea constituents should be considered in developing preventive strategies against UVB-induced skin carcinogenesis. The indirect removal of UVB damaged keratinocytes by herbal tea extracts via apoptosis may find application in the prevention of photo-induced inflammation.Entities:
Keywords: UVB irradiation; anti-inflammatory effects; antioxidants; dihydrochalcones; flavanones; herbal tea polyphenols; xanthones
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27706097 PMCID: PMC6274390 DOI: 10.3390/molecules21101323
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Comparative effect of green tea and herbal tea extracts on growth parameters of UV irradiated and non-irradiated HaCaT cells.
| Methanol | (−) | 0.08 ± 0.01 cA * | 0.15 ± 0.02 cA | 1.25 ± 0.21 b | 1.65 ± 0.14 a |
| (+) | 0.06 ± 0.01 aB * | 0.10 ± 0.01 aB * | >1.46 | >1.80 | |
| Aqueous | (−) | 0.14 ± 0.01 cA | 0.13 ± 0.01 cA | 0.49 ± 0 04 bA * | 0.89 ± 0.12 aA * |
| (+) | 0.14 ± 0.02 cA | 0.13 ± 0.01 cA | 0.41 ± 0.10 bA | 0.72 ± 0.11 aA | |
| Methanol | (−) | 0.06 ± 0.02 bA | 0.06 ± 0.01 bA | 0.37 ± 0.08 a | 0.27 ± 0.03 a |
| (+) | 0.09 ± 0.01 aA | 0.08 ± 0.01 aA | >0.71 | >1.80 | |
| Aqueous | (−) | 0.07 ± 0.01 bA | 0.08 ± 0.01 bA | 0.33 ± 0.07 aA | 0.31 ± 0.04 aA |
| (+) | 0.10 ± 0.02 cA | 0.10 ± 0.01 cA | 0.38 ± 0.05 bB | 0.53 ± 0.07 aB | |
Values represent mean ± standard deviation of 4–5 replicates and at least 2 independent experiments. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the different extracts are indicated with differing lower case letters in superscript (in a row). Significant differences between non-irradiated and UVB-irradiated cells for each extract type are indicated with differing upper case letters in subscript (in a column). Means followed by the same letter do not differ significantly. * Significant difference (p < 0.05) between methanol and aqueous extracts in the absence (−) and presence (+) of UVB irradiation. Abbreviations: IC50, concentration (mg/mL) yielding 50% inhibition; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; BrdU, 5-bromo-2′-deoxyuridine; (−), cells not exposed to UVB light; (+), cells exposed to UVB light (80 mJ/cm2).
Modulation of exIL-1α (pg/mL) in the supernatant by the methanol and aqueous extracts of green tea and rooibos herbal tea.
| Extract Type | (−) UVB | (+) UVB | Concentration (mg/mL) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.107 | 0.054 | 0.027 | 0.013 | |||
| Gr_Methanol | 2.57 ± 0.85a | 3.62 ± 0.31a | 1.35 ± 0.04b | 1.53 ± 0.15b | 1.84 ± 0.31b | 2.27 ± 0.57a |
| Gr_Aqueous | 2.92 ± 0.85a | 3.84 ± 0.56a | 2.01 ± 0.17b | 1.31 ± 0.20b | 1.15 ± 0.07b | 1.62 ± 0.15b |
| RB_Methanol | 1.62 ± 0.36a | 1.71 ± 0.24a | 1.43 ± 0.10a | 1.49 ± 0.36a | 1.62 ± 0.21a | 2.21 ± 0.18a |
| RB_Aqueous | 1.62 ± 0.36a | 1.71 ± 0.24a | 1.31 ± 0.29a | 1.26 ± 0.21a | 1.67 ± 0.49a | 1.20 ± 0.10a |
Values represent mean ± standard deviation of 4 to 5 repetitions and two independent experiments. Statistically significant differences were indicated with different lower case letters (in a row) compared to the controls (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: (−) UVB—cells that were not exposed to ultraviolet-B light; (+) UVB—cells exposed to UVB light (80 mJ/cm2; exIL-1α—extracellular interleukin-1α; Rg—green tea; RB—rooibos herbal tea.
Figure 1Modulation of cell viability (ATP content) and icIL-1α accumulation by green tea and rooibos tea in relation to their respective IC50 concentrations. Values are means of duplicate determinations with five repetitions each. Different letters implies significant (p < 0.05) differences between the means of the methanol and aqueous extracts within the selected parameter, respectively. Means between * Gr_MeOH and Rb_MeOH (IL-1α) and # Gr_MeOH and RB_MeOH (ATP) differ significantly (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: Gr—green tea; Rb—rooibos; Aq—water; MeOH—methanol.
Modulation of IL-1α and accumulation by the different honeybush extracts in relation to their effect on cell viability (ATP content).
| Parameter | Controls | Methanol Extracts (mg/mL) | Aqueous Extracts (mg/mL) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (−) UVB | (+) UVB | 0.73 | 0.37 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.79 | 0.39 | 0.20 | 0.10 | |
| icIL-1α (pg/mL) | 8.35 ± 1.0 d | 28.14 ± 2.41 b | 40.88 ± 2.78 a | 30.77 ± 2.34 b | 23.4 ± 2.52 b | 22.6 ± 2.24 b | 17.93 ± 7.45 c | 22.11 ± 7.35 b | 28.95 ± 7.43 b | 29.52 ± 7.63 b |
| exIL-1α (pg/mL) | nd | 1.41 ± 0.20 b | 1.73 ± 0.21 b | 1.75 ± 0.43 b | 1.93 ± 0.73 b | 2.42 ± 0.40 a | 2.63 ± 0.11 a | 1.39 ± 0.25 b | 1.35 ± 0.12 b | 1.46 ± 0.10 b |
| % ATP production | 100.0 ± 5.0 a | 83.96 ± 3.65 b | 82.29 ± 7.43 b | 88.63 ± 5.90 b | 81.91 ± 5.07 b | 84.31 ± 2.79 b | 35.15 ± 7.13 e | 55.64 ± 8.02 d | 68.25 ± 7.62 c | 74.82 ± 10.54 b |
| (−) UVB | (+) UVB | 0.71 | 0.36 | 0.18 | 0.09 | 0.75 | 0.36 | 0.19 | 0.09 | |
| icIL-1α (pg/mL) | 15.53 ± 3.51 d | 36.10 ± 5.73 b | 51.94 ± 4.2 a | 43.55 ± 9.16 b | 40.83 ± 8.24 b | 36.23 ± 7.87 b | 56.53 ± 4.14 a | 45.32 ± 3.97 c | 48.02 ± 5.63 c | 39.91 ± 9.92 bc |
| exIL-1α (pg/mL) | 2.72 ± 0.71 b | 3.72 ± 0.22 a | 2.40 ± 0.19 b | 2.62 ± 0.42 b | 2.65 ± 0.19 b | 2.72 ± 0.28 b | 1.22 ± 0.07 c | 1.31 ± 0.13 c | 1.84 ± 0.20 b | 1.74 ± 0.21 b |
| % ATP production | 100.00 ± 4.12 a | 89.60 ± 4.41 b | 82.07 ± 3.02 c | 86.28 ± 2.54 b | 88.01 ± 7.66 b | 93.48 ± 5.92 b | 42.02 ± 6.94 e | 62.22 ± 7.00 d | 77.33 ± 9.51 c | 79.37 ± 8.52 c |
Values represent mean ± standard deviation of four to five repetitions and two independent experiments. Statistically significant differences were indicated with different lower case letters in superscript (in a row) for each extract separately compared to the controls (p < 0.05). Abbreviations: (−) UVB—cells that were not exposed to ultraviolet-B light; (+) UVB—cells exposed to UVB light (80 mJ/cm2); icIL-1α—intracellular interleukin-1α; exIL-1α—extracellular interleukin-1α; % ATP production—indicate the percentage ATP production calculated from the relevant control cells; ATP—adenosine triphosphate; nd—not detected.
Correlation among cell viability, caspase-3 activity (fold) and icIL1-α content as affected by green tea and herbal tea extracts.
| Extract | icIL-1α_ATP | Casp-3_F_ATP | Casp-3_F _icIL-1α |
|---|---|---|---|
| Methanol | 0.618 (<0.0001) | −0.895 (<0.0001) | −0.863 (<0.0001) |
| Aqueous | 0.754 (<0.0001) | −0.880 (<0.0001) | −0.833 (<0.0001) |
| Methanol | 0.742 (<0.0001) | −0.878 (<0.0001) | −0.899 (<0.0001) |
| Aqueous | 0.796 (<0.0001) | −0.848 (<0.0001) | −0.876 (<0.0001) |
| Methanol | −0.494 (0.0005) | ||
| Aqueous | 0.720 (<0.0001) | −0.820 (<0.0001) | −0.555 (<0.0001) |
| Methanol | −0.309 (0.0017) | −0.597 (<0.0001) | |
| Aqueous | −0.229 (0.023) | −0.822 (<0.0001) | 0.517 (0.0001) |
Values represent correlation coefficients (r) with p values indicated in brackets. Abbreviations: Casp-3_ F—caspase-3 fold increase; icIL-1α_ATP—correlation between intracellular icIL-1α inhibition and ATP inhibition; Casp-3_F_ATP—correlation between caspase-3 fold increase and ATP inhibition; Casp-3_F_icIL-1α—correlation between caspase-3 fold increase and icIL-1α inhibition; ATP—adenosine triphosphate.
Polyphenol concentration (µg/mL) of green tea and rooibos extracts expressed as a function of the IC50 values for the inhibition of icIL-1α accumulation and reduction of cell viability following UVB irradiation in HaCaT keratinocytes.
| Polyphenols ** | icIL_1α | Cell Viability (% ATP) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methanol | Aqueous | Methanol | Aqueous | ||
| Green tea | |||||
| TP | 28.06 ± 2.62 a | 41.86 ± 5.62 b | 15.03 ± 0.99 a | 35.07 ± 2.30 b | |
| FLAVA | 10.58 ± 0.30 a | 20.18 ± 0.81 b | 7.94 ± 0.22 a | 10.86 ± 043 b | |
| EGCG | 8.95 ± 0.24 a | 29.10 ± 0.39 b | 6.72 ± 0.18 a | 6.45 ± 0.21 a | |
| ECG | 1.63 ± 0.03 a | 1.94 ± 0.11 b | 1.22 ± 0.02 a | 1.05 ± 0.06 a | |
| EGC | 3.38 ± 0.14 a | 8.932 ± 0.83 b | 2.54 ± 0.11 a | 4.48 ± 0.45 b | |
| EC | 1.19 ± 0.08 a | 2.93 ± 0.30 b | 0.90 ± 0.06 a | 1.58 ± 0.16 b | |
| Catechin | 0.11 ± 0.01 a | 0.29 ± 0.01 b | 0.08 ± 0.01 a | 0.16 ± 0.01 b | |
| Rooibos | |||||
| TP | 49.11 ± 4.82 a | 52.62 ± 5.97 a | 35.08 ± 3.44 a | 32.57 ± 3.70 a | |
| FLAVA | 3.26 ± 0.20 a | 3.24 ± 0.27 a | 2.71 ± 0.16 a | 2.34 ± 0.20 a | |
| Aspalathin | 17.39 ± 0.20 a | 17.61 ± 0.44 a | 12.44 ± 0.14 a | 10.90 ± 0.27 b | |
| Nothofagin | 3.86 ± 0.05 a | 3.50 ± 0.06 b | 2.76 ± 0.04 a | 2.17 ± 0.04 b | |
| Iso-orientin | 2.21 ± 0.01 a | 2.30 ± 0.41 a | 1.58 ± 0.01 a | 1.42 ± 0.25 a | |
| Orientin | 1.62 ± 0.01 a | 1.86 ± 0.30 a | 1.16 ± 0.01 a | 1.15 ± 0.19 a | |
| Vitexin | 0.22 ± 0.0 a | 0.25 ± 0.0 a | 0.16 ± 0.0 a | 0.16 ± 0.0 a | |
| Isovitexin | 0.32 ± 0.0 a | 0.32 ±0.03 a | 0.26 ± 0.0 a | 0.20 ± 0.02 a | |
| L7Glc | 0.25 ± 0.13 a | 0.09 ± 0.02 a | 0.18 ± 0.01 a | 0.06 ± 0.01 b | |
| Rutin | 0.60 ± 0.0 a | 0.76 ± 0.0 b | 0.43 ± 0.0 a | 0.47 ± 0.0 a | |
| Hyperoside | 0.49 ± 0.01 a | 0.31 ± 0.16 a | 0.35 ± 0.01 a | 0.19 ± 0.10 b | |
| Isoquercitrin | 0.63 ± 0.0 a | 0.42 ± 0.21 a | 0.45 ± 0.0 a | 0.26 ± 0.12 b | |
| QROB | 1.62 ± 0.0 a | 1.58 ± 0.0 a | 1.16 ± 0.01 a | 0.98 ± 0.12 a | |
| PPAG | 0.54 ± 0.03 a | 0.89 ± 0.02 b | 0.39 ± 0.02 a | 0.55 ± 0.01 b | |
Values represent means ± standard deviations of triplcate deteminations. * IC50 values as depicted in Table 1 (Cell viability) and Figure 1 (icIL-1α). ** Data calculated using the individual polyphenol content of the extracts as previously reported [24]. Statistically significant (p < 0.05) differences were indicated with different lower case letters (in a row) Abbreviations: TP—total polyphenols; FLAVA—polymeric tannin-like compounds including proanthocyanidins; IC50—concentration yielding 50% inhibition of ATP and icIL-1α; icIL-1α- intracellular interleukin-1α; ATP—adenosine triphosphate; EGCG—epigallocatechin gallate; EGC—epigallocatechin; ECG—epicatechin gallate; EC—picatechin; DHC—dihydrochalchones; L7Glc—luteolin-7-O-glucoside; QROB—quercetin-3-O-robinobioside; PPAG—phenylpyruvic acid glucoside (Precursor of phenolic compounds).
Polyphenol concentration (µg/mL) of the aqueous extracts of C. intermedia and C. subternata expressed as a function of the IC50 values for the reduction of cell viability and icIL-1α following UVB irradiation.
| Polyphenols ** | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IC50 % ATP | IC50 icIL-1α | IC50 % ATP | ||
| TP | 67.45 ± 4.63 a | 133.25 ± 10.86 | 126.00 ± 17.35 b | |
| FLAVA | 7.30 ± 0.37 a | 6.89 ± 0.55 | 16.49 ± 0.65 b | |
| Xanthones | Mangiferin | 16.30 ± 0.16 a | 24.26 ± 0.25 | 15.98 ± 2.15 a |
| Isomangiferin | 5.85 ± 0.24 a | 8.70 ± 0.24 | 6.26 ± 1.05 a | |
| Flavanones | Eriocitrin | 0.51 ± 0.02 a | 0.76 ± 0.04 | 2.35 ± 0.18 b |
| Hesperidin | 3.00 ± 0.23 a | 4.47 ± 0.34 | 5.75 ± 0.15 b | |
| Eriodictyol-glucoside | 2.79 ± 0.14 | |||
| Flavones | Luteolin | 0.09 ± 0.01 a | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 0.09 ± 0.04 a |
| Scolymoside | 2.90 ± 0.09 | |||
| DHC | Phloretin-3′,5′-di- | 0.28 ± 0.01 a | 0.41 ± 0.01 | 9.02 ± 1.02 b |
| Benzophenone | Iriflophenone-3- | 2.18 ± 0.05 a | 2.21 ± 0.07 | 6.71 ± 0.11 b |
Values represent means ± standard deviation of triplicate determinations. # Lacking IC50 value for icIL-1α. * IC50 values as derived from Table 1 and Table 4. Significant differences (p < 0.05) between the means (IC50 ATP) in a row) were indicated with different lower case letters. ** Data calculated using the individual polyphenol content of the extracts as previously reported [24]. Abbreviations: TP—total polyphenols; FLAVA—flavanols/proanthocyanidins; IC50—concentration yielding 50% inhibition.
Figure 2Quantitative levels of: (A) TP (total polyphenol); (B) FLAVA (flavanol/proanthocyanidin); (C) flavanone (hesperidin, eriocitrin and eriodictyol-glycoside); and (D) xanthones (mangiferin and isomangiferin) content of the methanol (MeOH) and aqueous (Aq) extracts of C. subternata and C. intermedia. Values represent means of triplicate determinations. *,# Means of methanol and aqueous extracts of a Cyclopia species differ significantly (p < 0.05). ** Significant (p < 0.05) species differences. Data derived from [24].
Modulation of UVB-induced apoptosis and cell viability (ATP production) by methanol and aqueous extracts of green tea and different herbal teas.
| Extracts | Unit Measurement | Controls | Methanol Extracts (mg/mL) | Aqueous Extracts (mg/mL) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Green tea | |||||||||
| 1.00 ± 0.19 d | 3.89 ± 0.68 c | 8.16 ± 0.74 a | 7.82 ± 0.76 a | 6.10 ± 0.21 b | 6.51 ± 0.77 a | 6.54 ± 0.48 a | 6.47 ± 0.81 a | ||
| % ATP production | 100.00 ± 3.97 a | 74.63 ± 4.79 b | 27.74 ± 2.35 d | 49.16 ± 5.51 c | 69.47 ± 5.05 b | 8.90 ± 3.08 d | 37.98 ± 4.83 c | ± 7.36 c | |
| Rooibos | |||||||||
| 1.00 ± 0.14 e | 3.59 ± 0.62 d | 10.12 ± 0.88 a | 9.03 ± 0.66 b | 7.44 ± 0.49 c | 5.14 ± 0.50 a | 4.61 ± 0.36 b | 3.56 ± 0.19 d | ||
| % ATP production | 100.00 ± 3.97 a | 74.63 ± 4.79 b | 28.43 ± 3.41 d | 48.18 ± 3.32 c | 66.74 ± 4.02 b | 15.94 ± 2.34 d | 29.56 ± 3.36 c | 48.94 ± 5.55 b | |
| 1.00 ± 0.16 c | 3.24 ± 0.44 a | 1.13 ± 0.16 c | 1.98 ± 0.12 b | 2.80 ± 0.29 a | 5.38 ± 0.47 b | 4.76 ± 0.05 b | 3.17 ± 0.42 a | ||
| % ATP production | 100.00 ± 3.80 a | 88.54 ± 8.84 b | 69.76 ± 2.92 c | 87.27 ± 5.25 b | 88.09 ± 3.59 b | 34.87 ± 2.39 d | 52.70 ± 5.46 b | 70.22 ± 6.27 c | |
| 1.00 ± 0.13 c | 3.44 ± 0.26 a | 2.44 ± 0.26 b | 2.87 ± 0.63 b | 3.77 ± 0.27 a | 5.87 ± 0.46 b | 4.50 ± 0.45 b | 4.00 ± 0.36 a | ||
| % ATP production | 100.00 ± 3.87 a | 92.37 ± 3.88 b | 85.12 ± 4.03 b | 94.50 ± 2.33 b | 93.78 ± 4.12 b | 56.94 ± 4.29 c | 82.76 ± 3.67 b | 93.46 ± 4.98 b | |
Values represent mean ± standard deviation of four to five repetitions and two independent experiments. Statistically significant differences between the different methanol and aqueous extract concentrations were compared separately to the controls. Means followed by the same letter (superscript in a row) do not differ significantly, if letters differ then p < 0.05. Abbreviations: ATP—adenosine triphosphate; Casp-3—caspase-3; % ATP production calculated against control cells; (−) UVB—cells that were not exposed to ultraviolet-B light; (+) UVB—cells exposed to UVB light (80 mJ/cm2).