| Literature DB >> 27704738 |
Abstract
Increased detection of thyroid nodules using high-resolution ultrasonography has resulted in a world-wide increase in the incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC). Despite the steep increase in its incidence, the age-standardized mortality rate of thyroid cancer has remained stable, which leads toward a trend of more conservative treatment. The latest American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines for thyroid nodules and thyroid cancer revised in 2015 suggested that fine needle aspiration biopsy should be performed for thyroid nodules larger than 1 cm and lobectomy might be sufficient for 1 to 4 cm intrathyroidal DTC. In addition, active surveillance instead of immediate surgical treatment was also recommended as a treatment option for papillary thyroid microcarcinoma based on the results of a few observational studies from Japan. The Korean Thyroid Association (KTA) has organized a task force team to develop revised guidelines for thyroid nodules and DTC after an extensive review of articles and intense discussion on whether we should accept the changes in the 2015 ATA guidelines. This paper introduces and discusses the updated major issues and differences in the ATA and the KTA guidelines.Entities:
Keywords: Guidelines; Thyroid neoplasms; Thyroid nodule
Year: 2016 PMID: 27704738 PMCID: PMC5053047 DOI: 10.3803/EnM.2016.31.3.373
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endocrinol Metab (Seoul) ISSN: 2093-596X
Sonographic Patterns, Risk of Malignancy, and FNA Guidance for Thyroid Nodules in the 2015 American Thyroid Association Guidelines
| Sonographic pattern | US features | Estimated risk of malignancy, % | FNA size cutoff (largest dimension) |
|---|---|---|---|
| High suspicion | Solid hypoechoic nodule or solid hypoechoic component of a partially cystic nodule with one or more of the following features: irregular margins (infiltrative, microlobulated), microcalcifications, taller than wide shape, rim calcifications with small extrusive soft tissue component, evidence of ETE | >70–90a | Recommend FNA at ≥1 cm |
| Intermediate suspicion | Hypoechoic solid nodule with smooth margins without microcalcifications, ETE, or taller than wide shape | 10–20 | Recommend FNA at ≥1 cm |
| Low suspicion | Isoechoic or hyperechoic solid nodule, or partially cystic nodule with eccentric solid areas, without microcalcification, irregular margin or ETE, or taller than wide shape | 5–10 | Recommend FNA at ≥1.5 cm |
| Very low suspicion | Spongiform or partially cystic nodules without any of the sonographic features described in low, intermediate, or high suspicion patterns | <3 | Consider FNA at ≥2 cm observation without FNA is also a reasonable option |
| Benign | Purely cystic nodules (no solid component) | <1 | No biopsyb |
Adapted from Haugen et al., with permission from Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. [3].
FNA, fine needle aspiration; US, ultrasonography; ETE, extrathyroidal extension.
aThe estimate is derived from high volume centers, the overall risk of malignancy may be lower given the interobserver variability in sonography; bAspiration of the cyst may be considered for symptomatic or cosmetic drainage.
Malignancy Risk Stratification according to K-TIRADS and FNA Indications
| Category | US feature | Malignancy risk, % | Calculated malignancy risk (%), overall (LV, HV) | Calculated sensitivity for malignancy (%), overall (LV, HV) | FNAa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5 | High suspicion | Solid hypoechoic nodule with any of 3 suspicious US featuresb | >60 | 79.3 (60.9, 84.9) | 51.3 (35.9, 56.7) | ≥1 cm (>0.5 cm, selective) |
| 4 | Intermediate suspicion | Solid hypoechoic nodule without any of 3 suspicious US featuresb or | 15–50 | 25.4 (15, 33.6) | 29.5 (29.9, 29.4) | ≥1 cm |
| 3 | Low suspicion | Partially cystic or isohyperechoic nodule without any of 3 suspicious US featuresb | 3–15 | 7.8 (6, 10.3)c | 19.2 (34.2, 13.9) | ≥1.5 cm |
| 2 | Benignd | Spongiform | <3 | 0 | 0 | ≥2 cm |
| 1 | No nodule | - | - | - | - | NA |
Adapted from Shin et al. [9]. LV and HV indicate low and high cancer volume data, respectively. Solid hypoechoic nodules include solid nodules with marked or mild hypoechogenicity.
K-TIRADS, Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System; FNA, fine needle aspiration; US, ultrasonography; LV, low volume; HV, high volume; NA, not applicable for FNA.
aFNA is indicated regardless of size and US feature of nodule in presence of poor prognostic factors including suspected lymph node metastasis by US or clinical evaluation, suspected extrathyroidal tumor extension, patients with diagnosed distant metastasis from thyroid cancer; bMicrocalcification, nonparallel orientation (taller-than-wide), spiculated/microlobulated margin; cMalignancy risk calculated from nodules excluding spongiform or partially cystic nodules with comet tail artifacts; dK-TIRADS 2 (benign category) includes partially cystic nodules with spongiform appearance or comet tail artifacts which do not have any suspicious US feature.
Fig. 1Algorithm used in the Korean Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System for malignancy risk stratification based on solidity and echogenicity of thyroid nodules. Adapted from Shin et al. [9]. US, ultrasonography. aMicrocalcification, taller than wide shape, spiculated/microlobulated margin.
Results of Two Studies on Active Surveillance in Japan
| Variable | Ito et al. (2014) [ | Sugitani et al. (2010) [ |
|---|---|---|
| No. of patients | 1,235 | 230 |
| Mean follow-up duration, mo | 60 | 60 |
| Progression, % | ||
| Size enlargement >3 mm | ||
| 5 yr | 5 | 7 |
| 10 yr | 8 | |
| LN metastasis | ||
| 5 yr | 1.7 | 1 |
| 10 yr | 3.8 | |
| Recurrence after delayed Op | 1/191 | 0/16 |
LN, lymph node; Op, operation.