H A Owen1,2,3, G N Buchanan2,4, A Schizas1, A Emmanuel2,3, R Cohen2,3, A B Williams1,2. 1. The Pelvic Floor Unit, Department of Surgery, Guy's & St Thomas' Hospital, London, UK. 2. Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK. 3. Department of Surgery, University College London Hospital, London, UK. 4. Department of Surgery, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK.
Abstract
AIM: Anal fistula causes pain and discharge of pus and blood. Treatment by fistulotomy has the highest success, but can risk continence; treatment needs to balance cure with continence. This study assessed the impact of fistulotomy on quality of life (QOL) and continence. METHOD: Patients selected for fistulotomy prospectively completed the St Mark's Continence Score (full incontinence = 24) and Short Form-36 questionnaires preoperatively at two institutions with an interest in anal fistula. Patients were reassessed 3 months' postoperatively. RESULTS: There were 52 patients with a median age of 44 (range 19-82) years; 10 were women. Preoperative continence scores were median 0 (range 0-23) and there was no significant difference compared with postoperative scores (median 1, range 0-24). Following fistulotomy QOL was significantly improved in four of eight domains - Bodily Pain (P < 0.001), Vitality (P < 0.01), Social Functioning (P < 0.05) and Mental Health (P < 0.001) - and returned to that of the general population. QOL for patients with intersphincteric fistula improved postfistulotomy, and for those with trans-sphincteric fistula it remained the same. Data were further examined in two groups, with and without deterioration in continence score. Where continence improved postoperatively, QOL improved in three domains; where continence deteriorated QOL improved in two domains (P < 0.05). Patients with postoperative continence scores of < 5 had worse QOL than those scoring 4 or less. CONCLUSION: QOL significantly improved at 3 months' follow-up after fistulotomy where continence was maintained or a small reduction occurred. Colorectal Disease
AIM: Anal fistula causes pain and discharge of pus and blood. Treatment by fistulotomy has the highest success, but can risk continence; treatment needs to balance cure with continence. This study assessed the impact of fistulotomy on quality of life (QOL) and continence. METHOD:Patients selected for fistulotomy prospectively completed the St Mark's Continence Score (full incontinence = 24) and Short Form-36 questionnaires preoperatively at two institutions with an interest in anal fistula. Patients were reassessed 3 months' postoperatively. RESULTS: There were 52 patients with a median age of 44 (range 19-82) years; 10 were women. Preoperative continence scores were median 0 (range 0-23) and there was no significant difference compared with postoperative scores (median 1, range 0-24). Following fistulotomy QOL was significantly improved in four of eight domains - Bodily Pain (P < 0.001), Vitality (P < 0.01), Social Functioning (P < 0.05) and Mental Health (P < 0.001) - and returned to that of the general population. QOL for patients with intersphincteric fistula improved postfistulotomy, and for those with trans-sphincteric fistula it remained the same. Data were further examined in two groups, with and without deterioration in continence score. Where continence improved postoperatively, QOL improved in three domains; where continence deteriorated QOL improved in two domains (P < 0.05). Patients with postoperative continence scores of < 5 had worse QOL than those scoring 4 or less. CONCLUSION: QOL significantly improved at 3 months' follow-up after fistulotomy where continence was maintained or a small reduction occurred. Colorectal Disease
Authors: Nusrat Iqbal; Astrid J H M Machielsen; Stephanie O Breukink; Rebecca Woodcock; Gillian Kane; Laith Alrubaiy; Ugo Grossi; Merel L Kimman; Phil J Tozer Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2022-02-17 Impact factor: 3.440