| Literature DB >> 27703692 |
James B Bell1, Alfred Aquilina2, Clare Woulds3, Adrian G Glover4, Crispin T S Little5, William D K Reid6, Laura E Hepburn2, Jason Newton7, Rachel A Mills2.
Abstract
Despite a number of studies in areas of focused methane seepage, the extent of transitional sediments of more diffuse methane seepage, and their influence upon biological communities is poorly understood. We investigated an area of reducing sediments with elevated levels of methane on the South Georgia margin around 250 m depth and report data from a series of geochemical and biological analyses. Here, the geochemical signatures were consistent with weak methane seepage and the role of sub-surface methane consumption was clearly very important, preventing gas emissions into bottom waters. As a result, the contribution of methane-derived carbon to the microbial and metazoan food webs was very limited, although sulfur isotopic signatures indicated a wider range of dietary contributions than was apparent from carbon isotope ratios. Macrofaunal assemblages had high dominance and were indicative of reducing sediments, with many taxa common to other similar environments and no seep-endemic fauna, indicating transitional assemblages. Also similar to other cold seep areas, there were samples of authigenic carbonate, but rather than occurring as pavements or sedimentary concretions, these carbonates were restricted to patches on the shells of Axinulus antarcticus (Bivalvia, Thyasiridae), which is suggestive of microbe-metazoan interactions.Entities:
Keywords: Southern Ocean; assemblage composition; authigenic carbonates; ecology; methane; trophodynamics
Year: 2016 PMID: 27703692 PMCID: PMC5043311 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160284
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.Map of sampling locations around South Georgia. Blue triangles indicate JC42 and JC55 sampling stations. Black circles indicate positions of gas flares [10] and the white cross shows the location of recovered ikaite crystals [41]. Bathymetry data from GEBCO.
Figure 2.Images of seafloor of survey region from towed video platform and crystals of Ikaite recovered [41]. Crystal image courtesy of Mark Belchier. Red laser dots 10 cm apart.
Positions (degrees and decimal minutes), depths and usage of JC42 gravity core and JC55 megacore deployments on the southwest South Georgia margin. Three to four cores pooled per deployment for quantitative macrofauna. XRD, X-ray diffraction; SIA, stable isotope analysis; PLFA, phospholipid fatty acids.
| cruise | station | sub-station | latitude | longitude | depth (m) | faunal preservation | use(s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JC42 | 02_03 | 1 | −54.1575 | −37.9761 | 257 | n.a. | Geochemistry |
| JC55 | 111 | 1 | −54.1575 | −37.9761 | 257 | n.a. | Dissolved O2, PLFAs |
| 112 | 1 | −54.1575 | −37.9761 | 257 | 6% Form. | Quant. Macrofauna, Geochemistry, XRD | |
| 113 | 2 | −54.1580 | −37.9345 | 247 | 80% Etoh | Macrofaunal SIA, Geochemistry, XRD | |
| 117 | 3 | −54.1475 | −37.9717 | 254 | 6% Form. | Quant. Macrofauna, Geochemistry, Dissolved O2 | |
| 118 | 2 | −54.1580 | −37.9344 | 247 | 6% Form. | Quant. Macrofauna, XRD | |
| 119 | 2 | −54.1580 | −37.9344 | 248 | 80% Etoh | Macrofaunal SIA | |
| 120 | 2 | −54.1580 | −37.9344 | 248 | 6% Form. | Quant. Macrofauna, XRD | |
| 121 | 2 | −54.1580 | −37.9344 | 248 | 6% Form. | Quant. Macrofauna | |
| 122 | 2 | −54.1580 | −37.9344 | 248 | 80% Etoh | Macrofaunal SIA, XRD |
Macrofaunal assemblage composition (quantitative cores only, abundance per m2) and stable isotopic data. A = 0–5 cmbsf, B = 5–10 cmbsf.
| taxa | core | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| class | genus/other | species | 112 | 117 | 118 | 120 | 121 |
| Polychaeta | spA | 95.50 | 466.87 | 318.32 | 31.83 | 445.64 | |
| 286.49 | 721.52 | 190.99 | 413.81 | 477.48 | |||
| Aphroditidae | Aphroditidae sp. | 95.50 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Polynoidae | Polynoidae sp. | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 31.83 | 0.00 | |
| Sigalionidae | Sigalionidae sp. | 0.00 | 0.00 | 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Chrysopetalidae | Chrysopetalidae sp. | 0.00 | 127.33 | 127.33 | 31.83 | 31.83 | |
| 1305.10 | 5177.96 | 3215.01 | 2864.86 | 4169.96 | |||
| ( | 509.31 | 594.19 | 477.48 | 286.49 | 445.64 | ||
| 572.97 | 1485.48 | 732.13 | 700.30 | 954.95 | |||
| Syllides | sp. | 286.49 | 212.21 | 127.33 | 63.66 | 95.50 | |
| 0.00 | 84.88 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 541.14 | 933.73 | 381.98 | 254.65 | 509.31 | |||
| 63.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| Sphaerodorum | spA | 31.83 | 42.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 63.66 | |
| Phyllodocidae | Phyllodocidae sp. | 0.00 | 42.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Apistobranchidae | Apistobranchidae sp. | 31.83 | 42.44 | 63.66 | 31.83 | 31.83 | |
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 63.66 | 31.83 | |||
| 222.82 | 42.44 | 350.15 | 159.16 | 127.33 | |||
| Spionidae | Spionidae sp. | 0.00 | 0.00 | 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 5634.22 | 10 483.26 | 14 419.78 | 10 122.50 | 11 491.26 | |||
| 1209.61 | 169.77 | 318.32 | 1145.94 | 604.80 | |||
| 0.00 | 169.77 | 0.00 | 63.66 | 254.65 | |||
| sp. indet/juveniles | 0.00 | 0.00 | 445.64 | 572.97 | 222.82 | ||
| 413.81 | 551.75 | 63.66 | 31.83 | 159.16 | |||
| Sternaspidae | Sternaspidae sp. | 0.00 | 169.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 31.83 | |
| Ampharetidae | sp. indet | 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| sp. | 31.83 | 42.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| Polycirrus | sp. indet/juveniles | 31.83 | 0.00 | 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| 63.66 | 42.44 | 159.16 | 63.66 | 254.65 | |||
| Polycirrus | sp. | 0.00 | 42.44 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Terebellidae | sp. | 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Trichobranchidae | Trichobranchidae sp. | 222.82 | 84.88 | 0.00 | 31.83 | 0.00 | |
| spA | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 159.16 | 0.00 | ||
| spB | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 31.83 | ||
| 31.83 | 0.00 | 63.66 | 0.00 | 63.66 | |||
| 31.83 | 42.44 | 63.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| Opheliidae | Opheliidae sp. | 0.00 | 0.00 | 95.50 | 31.83 | 31.83 | |
| 0.00 | 84.88 | 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |||
| 668.47 | 679.08 | 859.46 | 350.15 | 1018.62 | |||
| 31.83 | 84.88 | 159.16 | 0.00 | 95.50 | |||
| 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 95.50 | 95.50 | |||
| Bivalvia | 2864.86 | 3225.62 | 3215.01 | 2260.05 | 3756.15 | ||
| sp. cf | 63.66 | 169.77 | 0.00 | 95.50 | 95.50 | ||
| sp. | 127.33 | 127.33 | 63.66 | 95.50 | 445.64 | ||
| 63.66 | 0.00 | 31.83 | 0.00 | 63.66 | |||
| Clitellata | spA | 127.33 | 6069.25 | 1464.26 | 2801.19 | 2482.88 | |
| spA | 8530.91 | 1612.81 | 2291.89 | 2164.56 | 1718.91 | ||
| spB | 31.83 | 0.00 | 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| Malacostraca | Lysianassidae | 0.00 | 42.44 | 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Phoxocephalidae | 95.50 | 169.77 | 413.81 | 190.99 | 190.99 | ||
| Synopiidae | 0.00 | 127.33 | 190.99 | 95.50 | 254.65 | ||
| Ampeliscidae | 0.00 | 0.00 | 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| Sphaeromatidae | 0.00 | 0.00 | 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| Idoteidae | 0.00 | 0.00 | 63.66 | 0.00 | 31.83 | ||
| Antarcturidae | 0.00 | 42.44 | 0.00 | 31.83 | 0.00 | ||
| Gynodiastylidae | 0.00 | 42.44 | 63.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| Pseudocumatidae | 0.00 | 42.44 | 31.83 | 0.00 | 63.66 | ||
| Lampropridae | 0.00 | 0.00 | 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| Mysida | 0.00 | 84.88 | 31.83 | 63.66 | 31.83 | ||
| Tanaidae | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 63.66 | ||
| Neotanaidae | 95.50 | 127.33 | 63.66 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||
| Ophiuroidea | Ophiurina | 31.83 | 42.44 | 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Holothiuroidea | Holothuroidea | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 31.83 | |
| Ascidiacea | Ascidiacea | 127.33 | 84.88 | 190.99 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| Annelida | Echiura | spB | 31.83 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 31.83 |
| Sipuncula | 700.30 | 509.31 | 445.64 | 190.99 | 604.80 | ||
Faunal abundance, diversity and species richness of macrofauna from quantitatively sampled cores. Proportion of individuals counted to total density varied as a result of different numbers of pooled cores between deployments.
| JC55 station | sub-station | Ind. counted | Ind. m−2 | species observed | diversity (H’) | estimated species richness ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 112 | 1 | 798 | 25 402 | 40 | 2.27 | 16.81 (2.55) |
| 117 | 3 | 828 | 35 142 | 43 | 2.38 | 17.60 (2.56) |
| 118 | 2 | 990 | 31 513 | 45 | 2.18 | 17.57 (2.43) |
| 120 | 2 | 804 | 25 593 | 34 | 2.18 | 15.85 (2.24) |
| 121 | 2 | 993 | 31 609 | 41 | 2.36 | 18.23 (2.36) |
Figure 3.Species and sediment organic matter δ13C and δ15N ± 1 s.d., grouped by higher taxa.
Figure 4.Faunal and Sediment organic matter δ34S ± 1 s.d., grouped by higher taxa.
Figure 5.JC55 Megacore profiles. Legend as upper-left for all plots except oxygen (bottom-right).
Figure 6.JC42 Gravity core profiles. X scale varies.
Figure 7.Class/Order level multidimensional scaling (MDS) plot of South Georgia macrofauna composition compared to cold seep and background sediments. CA, California margin seeps [69]; FB, FoodBancs, WAP [70]; OR, Oregon margin seeps [69]; SDT, San Diego Trough seeps [68]; SG, South Georgia (this study).