| Literature DB >> 27703294 |
Aziz Sukalo1, Dervis Deljo1, Amina Krupalija2, Nerma Zjajo2, Sabina Kos2, Amela Curic2, Goran Divkovic2, Sabina Hubjar2, Mina Smailagic2, Edina Hodzic3, Danijela Marjanovic3, Senad Medjedovic4.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Paper is written on the basis of data collected in collaboration with family doctors in several cities in Bosnia and Herzegovina.Entities:
Keywords: Lisinopril/hydrochlorothiazide; hypertension; treatment
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27703294 PMCID: PMC5034990 DOI: 10.5455/medarh.2016.70.299-302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Arch ISSN: 0350-199X
Summary of the total sample (N = 270). The numbers in the second column represents N (%) and in case of average values–mean +/- standard deviation (min-max range).
Comparison of mean age by L/H dose, t=-0.828; p=0.409
Figure 1Review of systolic pressure over three measurements
Figure 2Review of diastolic pressure through three measurements
Figure 3Review of heart rate through three measurements
Overview by gender and L/H dose; χ2=0.675; p=0.247
Review of side effects in the sample; χ2=3.120; p=0.065
Figure 4The types of side eff ects (χ2=3.155; p=0.207)
Figure 5Treatment effi cacy (χ2=0.560; p=0.906)