Liangjian Lu1, Albert Koulman2, Clive J Petry1, Benjamin Jenkins2, Lee Matthews2, Ieuan A Hughes1, Carlo L Acerini1, Ken K Ong1,3, David B Dunger4,5. 1. Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K. 2. Medical Research Council Human Nutrition Research, Cambridge, U.K. 3. Medical Research Council Epidemiology Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K. 4. Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, U.K. dbd25@cam.ac.uk. 5. Wellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Institute of Metabolic Science, Cambridge, U.K.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between early second trimester serum lipidomic variation and maternal glycemic traits at 28 weeks and to identify predictive lipid biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective study of 817 pregnant women (discovery cohort, n = 200; validation cohort, n = 617) who provided an early second trimester serum sample and underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 28 weeks. In the discovery cohort, lipids were measured using direct infusion mass spectrometry and correlated with OGTT results. Variable importance in projection (VIP) scores were used to identify candidate lipid biomarkers. Candidate biomarkers were measured in the validation cohort using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and tested for associations with OGTT results and GDM status. RESULTS: Early second trimester lipidomic variation was associated with 1-h postload glucose levels but not with fasting plasma glucose levels. Of the 13 lipid species identified by VIP scores, 10 had nominally significant associations with postload glucose levels. In the validation cohort, 5 of these 10 lipids had significant associations with postload glucose levels that were independent of maternal age and BMI, i.e., TG(51.1), TG(48:1), PC(32:1), PCae(40:3), and PCae(40:4). All except the last were also associated with maternal GDM status. Together, these four lipid biomarkers had moderate ability to predict GDM (area under curve [AUC] = 0.71 ± 0.04, P = 4.85 × 10-7) and improved the prediction of GDM by age and BMI alone from AUC 0.69 to AUC 0.74. CONCLUSIONS: Specific early second trimester lipid biomarkers can predict maternal GDM status independent of maternal age and BMI, potentially enhancing risk factor-based screening.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between early second trimester serum lipidomic variation and maternal glycemic traits at 28 weeks and to identify predictive lipid biomarkers for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Prospective study of 817 pregnant women (discovery cohort, n = 200; validation cohort, n = 617) who provided an early second trimester serum sample and underwent an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 28 weeks. In the discovery cohort, lipids were measured using direct infusion mass spectrometry and correlated with OGTT results. Variable importance in projection (VIP) scores were used to identify candidate lipid biomarkers. Candidate biomarkers were measured in the validation cohort using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and tested for associations with OGTT results and GDM status. RESULTS: Early second trimester lipidomic variation was associated with 1-h postload glucose levels but not with fasting plasma glucose levels. Of the 13 lipid species identified by VIP scores, 10 had nominally significant associations with postload glucose levels. In the validation cohort, 5 of these 10 lipids had significant associations with postload glucose levels that were independent of maternal age and BMI, i.e., TG(51.1), TG(48:1), PC(32:1), PCae(40:3), and PCae(40:4). All except the last were also associated with maternal GDM status. Together, these four lipid biomarkers had moderate ability to predict GDM (area under curve [AUC] = 0.71 ± 0.04, P = 4.85 × 10-7) and improved the prediction of GDM by age and BMI alone from AUC 0.69 to AUC 0.74. CONCLUSIONS: Specific early second trimester lipid biomarkers can predict maternal GDM status independent of maternal age and BMI, potentially enhancing risk factor-based screening.
Authors: Wan T Teh; Helena J Teede; Eldho Paul; Cheryce L Harrison; Euan M Wallace; Carolyn Allan Journal: Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 2.100
Authors: Dariush Mozaffarian; Haiming Cao; Irena B King; Rozenn N Lemaitre; Xiaoling Song; David S Siscovick; Gökhan S Hotamisligil Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2010-10-13 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Ute M Schaefer-Graf; Siri L Kjos; Omer Kilavuz; Andreas Plagemann; Martin Brauer; Joachim W Dudenhausen; Klaus Vetter Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-01 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Denise M Scholtens; Michael J Muehlbauer; Natalie R Daya; Robert D Stevens; Alan R Dyer; Lynn P Lowe; Boyd E Metzger; Christopher B Newgard; James R Bain; William L Lowe Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2013-08-29 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Nita G Forouhi; Albert Koulman; Stephen J Sharp; Fumiaki Imamura; Janine Kröger; Matthias B Schulze; Francesca L Crowe; José María Huerta; Marcela Guevara; Joline W J Beulens; Geertruida J van Woudenbergh; Laura Wang; Keith Summerhill; Julian L Griffin; Edith J M Feskens; Pilar Amiano; Heiner Boeing; Françoise Clavel-Chapelon; Laureen Dartois; Guy Fagherazzi; Paul W Franks; Carlos Gonzalez; Marianne Uhre Jakobsen; Rudolf Kaaks; Timothy J Key; Kay-Tee Khaw; Tilman Kühn; Amalia Mattiello; Peter M Nilsson; Kim Overvad; Valeria Pala; Domenico Palli; J Ramón Quirós; Olov Rolandsson; Nina Roswall; Carlotta Sacerdote; María-José Sánchez; Nadia Slimani; Annemieke M W Spijkerman; Anne Tjonneland; Maria-José Tormo; Rosario Tumino; Daphne L van der A; Yvonne T van der Schouw; Claudia Langenberg; Elio Riboli; Nicholas J Wareham Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2014-08-05 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: Samuel Furse; Sara L White; Claire L Meek; Benjamin Jenkins; Clive J Petry; Matias C Vieira; Susan E Ozanne; David B Dunger; Lucilla Poston; Albert Koulman Journal: Mol Omics Date: 2019-12-02
Authors: Guanhong Miao; Ying Zhang; Zhiguang Huo; Wenjie Zeng; Jianhui Zhu; Jason G Umans; Gert Wohlgemuth; Diego Pedrosa; Brian DeFelice; Shelley A Cole; Amanda M Fretts; Elisa T Lee; Barbara V Howard; Oliver Fiehn; Jinying Zhao Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2021-10-26 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Afreen Haider; Yu-Chen Wei; Koini Lim; Antonio D Barbosa; Che-Hsiung Liu; Ursula Weber; Marek Mlodzik; Kadri Oras; Simon Collier; M Mahmood Hussain; Liang Dong; Satish Patel; Anna Alvarez-Guaita; Vladimir Saudek; Benjamin J Jenkins; Albert Koulman; Marcus K Dymond; Roger C Hardie; Symeon Siniossoglou; David B Savage Journal: Dev Cell Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 12.270