| Literature DB >> 27702587 |
David P Jarmolowicz1, Derek D Reed2, Amanda S Bruce3, Delwyn Catley4, Sharon Lynch5, Kathy Goggin6, Seung-Lark Lim7, Lauren Strober8, Morgan Glusman9, Abigail N Norouzinia10, Jared M Bruce11.
Abstract
Much like delay discounting, probability discounting may be related to a host of pro-health behaviors. In a recent report, a Medical Decision Making Questionnaire (MDMQ) was developed that leveraged this insights of probability discounting to both describe ways that multiple sclerosis (MS) patients weigh costs and benefits when making adherence choices, and predicted their self-reported treatment adherence. The current re-analysis of those data use a novel EP50 measure as a framework of a model that predicted the cost/benefit ratios necessary for the choices of typically non-adherent patients to become indistinguishable from those of typically adherent patients (and vice versa). These analytic tools may aid in the development/evaluation of both novel therapeutics and treatment adherence strategies for chronic conditions.Entities:
Keywords: EP50; Patients; Probability discounting; Treatment adherence
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27702587 DOI: 10.1016/j.beproc.2016.09.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Processes ISSN: 0376-6357 Impact factor: 1.777