Literature DB >> 27702552

The effect of culture medium and carrier on explant culture of human limbal epithelium: A comparison of ultrastructure, keratin profile and gene expression.

Meeta Pathak1, O K Olstad2, Liv Drolsum3, Morten C Moe3, Natalia Smorodinova4, Sarka Kalasova5, Katerina Jirsova5, Bjørn Nicolaissen3, Agate Noer6.   

Abstract

Patients with limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD) often experience pain and photophobia due to recurrent epithelial defects and chronic inflammation of the cornea. Successfully restoring a healthy corneal surface in these patients by transplantation of ex vivo expanded human limbal epithelial cells (LECs) may alleviate these symptoms and significantly improve their quality of life. The clinical outcome of transplantation is known to be influenced by the quality of transplanted cells. Presently, several different protocols for cultivation and transplantation of LECs are in use. However, no consensus on an optimal protocol exists. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of culture medium and carrier on the morphology, staining of selected keratins and global gene expression in ex vivo cultured LECs. Limbal biopsies from cadaveric donors were cultured for three weeks on human amniotic membrane (HAM) or on tissue culture coated plastic (PL) in either a complex medium (COM), containing recombinant growth factors, hormones, cholera toxin and fetal bovine serum, or in medium supplemented only with human serum (HS). The expanded LECs were examined by light microscopy (LM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), immunohistochemistry (IHC) for keratins K3, K7, K8, K12, K13, K14, K15 and K19, as well as microarray and qRT-PCR analysis. The cultured LECs exhibited similar morphology and keratin staining on LM, TEM and IHC examination, regardless of the culture condition. The epithelium was multilayered, with cuboidal basal cells and flattened superficial cells. Cells were attached to each other by desmosomes. Adhesion complexes were observed between basal cells and the underlying carrier in LECs cultured on HAM, but not in LECs cultured on PL. GeneChip Human Gene 2.0 ST microarray (Affymetrix) analysis revealed that 18,653 transcripts were ≥2 fold up or downregulated (p ≤ 0.05). Cells cultured in the same medium (COM or HS) showed more similarities in gene expression than cells cultured on the same carrier (HAM or PL). When each condition was compared to HAM/COM, no statistical difference was found in the transcription level of the selected genes associated with keratin expression, stemness, proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, corneal wound healing or autophagy. In conclusion, the results indicate that ex vivo cultures of LECs on HAM and PL, using culture media supplemented with COM or HS, yield tissues with similar morphology and keratin staining. The gene expression appears to be more similar in cells cultured in the same medium (COM or HS) compared to cells cultured on the same carrier (HAM or PL).
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cornea; Explant culture; Human serum; Limbal epithelium; Limbal stem cell deficiency; Stem cell; Transplantation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27702552     DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2016.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Eye Res        ISSN: 0014-4835            Impact factor:   3.467


  11 in total

1.  Comparison of culture media indicates a role for autologous serum in enhancing phenotypic preservation of rabbit limbal stem cells in explant culture.

Authors:  Mehmet Gürdal; Özlem Barut Selver; Kemal Baysal; İsmet Durak
Journal:  Cytotechnology       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 2.058

Review 2.  The application of human amniotic membrane in the surgical management of limbal stem cell deficiency.

Authors:  Qihua Le; Sophie X Deng
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 3.  Amniotic Membrane Transplantation in Ophthalmology: An Updated Perspective.

Authors:  Andrew Walkden
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-07-22

4.  Observation of corneal transplantation in peripheral corneal disease postoperatively.

Authors:  Yibing Zhang; Yuan Hu; Xiaodong Li; Xiaoru Shi; Feihong Xu; Hui Jia
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 2.447

5.  The healing dynamics of non-healing wounds using cryo-preserved amniotic membrane.

Authors:  Alzbeta Svobodova; Vojtech Horvath; Ingrida Smeringaiova; Joao Victor Cabral; Martina Zemlickova; Radovan Fiala; Jan Burkert; Denisa Nemetova; Petr Stadler; Jaroslav Lindner; Jan Bednar; Katerina Jirsova
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.099

6.  Effect of air-lifting on the stemness, junctional protein formation, and cytokeratin expression of in vitro cultivated limbal epithelial cell sheets.

Authors:  Lily Wei Chen; Yan-Ming Chen; Chia-Ju Lu; Mei-Yun Chen; Szu-Yuan Lin; Fung-Rong Hu; Wei-Li Chen
Journal:  Taiwan J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017 Oct-Dec

Review 7.  Twenty years of limbal epithelial therapy: an update on managing limbal stem cell deficiency.

Authors:  Roberto Fernandez-Buenaga; Francesco Aiello; Sarah S Zaher; Andre Grixti; Sajjad Ahmad
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-08-10

8.  Interleukin-13 maintains the stemness of conjunctival epithelial cell cultures prepared from human limbal explants.

Authors:  Andrea Stadnikova; Peter Trosan; Pavlina Skalicka; Tor Paaske Utheim; Katerina Jirsova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Selecting Appropriate Reference Genes for Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Studies in Isolated and Cultured Ocular Surface Epithelia.

Authors:  Sara I Van Acker; Zoë P Van Acker; Michel Haagdorens; Isabel Pintelon; Carina Koppen; Nadia Zakaria
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Differential Gene Expression between Limbal Niche Progenitors and Bone Marrow Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Shen Li; Lingjuan Xu; Menglin Jiang; Xinyu Li; Yuan Zhang; Sean Tighe; Yingting Zhu; Guigang Li
Journal:  Int J Med Sci       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.738

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.