Literature DB >> 27701845

End-of-life issues: Withdrawal and withholding of life-sustaining healthcare in the emergency department: A comparison between emergency physicians and emergency registrars: A sub-study.

Philip G Richardson1, Jaimi Greenslade1, Jonathon Isoardi2, Michael Davey3, Mark Gillett4, Alicia Tucker5, Sharon Klim6, Anne-Maree Kelly6, Ibrahim Abdelmahmoud1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated and compared the importance of the considerations and discussions when withdrawing and withholding life-sustaining healthcare between emergency physicians (EP) and emergency registrars (ER).
METHODS: This was a sub-study of a prospective cross-sectional questionnaire-based case series conducted in six EDs. Primary outcomes were, which of the discussion and considerations, were rated most important by EP and ER in the decision-making process.
RESULTS: We studied responses relating to the care of 320 patients, of which 49.4% were women and the median age was 83 (interquartile range [IQR] 72-88). EP and ER were sole decision-makers in 185 (39.7%) and 135 (30.0%) of cases, respectively. Treatment was withdrawn or withheld in 72.0 and 90.6% of all deaths by EP and ER, respectively (P < 0.001). EP and ER provided full treatment in 88 (34%) and 19 (12.7%) of cases, respectively (P < 0.05). The consideration rated most important was prognosis: 165 (90.2%, confidence interval: 85.0-93.7) and 121 (90.3%, confidence interval: 84.1-94.2) for EP and ER, respectively. ER rated co-morbidities and age more important than did EP (P < 0.05). Both rated discussions with family as very important. EP and ER referred 6.0% versus 11.9% patients to palliative care services, respectively. The proportion of patients taking longer than 24 h to die was higher for ER compared with that for EP (14.1% vs 4.9%, P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: We found that ER were more likely to withdraw/withhold life-sustaining healthcare, provide partial treatment, rate different considerations as important and their patients took longer to die than that of EP. Focused education and training might improve decision-making consistency between physicians and training registrars.
© 2016 Australasian College for Emergency Medicine and Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  death; emergency department; end-of-life care

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27701845     DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12684

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med Australas        ISSN: 1742-6723            Impact factor:   2.151


  2 in total

Review 1.  Pragmatic methods to avoid intensive care unit admission when it does not align with patient and family goals.

Authors:  Nita Khandelwal; Ann C Long; Robert Y Lee; Cara L McDermott; Ruth A Engelberg; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2019-05-20       Impact factor: 30.700

Review 2.  End-of-Life Care Challenges from Staff Viewpoints in Emergency Departments: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Ali J Alqahtani; Geoffrey Mitchell
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-29
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.