Judith Teich1, Mir M Ali1, Sean Lynch1, Ryan Mutter1. 1. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics & Quality, Substance Abuse & Mental Health Services Administration, Rockville, Maryland.
Abstract
PURPOSE: There is concern that veterans living in rural areas may not be receiving the mental health (MH) treatment they need. This study uses recent national survey data to examine the utilization of MH treatment among military veterans with a MH condition living in rural areas, providing comparisons with estimates of veterans living in urban areas. METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression is utilized to examine differences in MH service use by urban/rural residence, controlling for other factors. Rates of utilization of inpatient and outpatient treatment, psychotropic medication, any MH treatment, and perceived unmet need for MH care are examined. FINDINGS: There were significant differences in MH treatment utilization among veterans by rural/urban residence. Multivariate estimates indicate that compared to veterans with a MH condition living in urban areas, veterans in rural areas had 70% lower odds of receiving any MH treatment. Veterans with a MH condition in rural areas have approximately 52% and 64% lower odds of receiving outpatient treatment and prescription medications, respectively, compared to those living in urban areas. Differences in perceived unmet need for mental health treatment were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: While research indicates that recent efforts to improve MH service delivery have resulted in improved access to services, this study found that veterans' rates of MH treatment are lower in rural areas, compared to urban areas. Continued efforts to support the provision of behavioral health services to rural veterans are needed. Telemedicine, using rural providers to their maximum potential, and engagement with community stakeholder groups are promising approaches.
PURPOSE: There is concern that veterans living in rural areas may not be receiving the mental health (MH) treatment they need. This study uses recent national survey data to examine the utilization of MH treatment among military veterans with a MH condition living in rural areas, providing comparisons with estimates of veterans living in urban areas. METHODS: Multivariable logistic regression is utilized to examine differences in MH service use by urban/rural residence, controlling for other factors. Rates of utilization of inpatient and outpatient treatment, psychotropic medication, any MH treatment, and perceived unmet need for MH care are examined. FINDINGS: There were significant differences in MH treatment utilization among veterans by rural/urban residence. Multivariate estimates indicate that compared to veterans with a MH condition living in urban areas, veterans in rural areas had 70% lower odds of receiving any MH treatment. Veterans with a MH condition in rural areas have approximately 52% and 64% lower odds of receiving outpatient treatment and prescription medications, respectively, compared to those living in urban areas. Differences in perceived unmet need for mental health treatment were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: While research indicates that recent efforts to improve MH service delivery have resulted in improved access to services, this study found that veterans' rates of MH treatment are lower in rural areas, compared to urban areas. Continued efforts to support the provision of behavioral health services to rural veterans are needed. Telemedicine, using rural providers to their maximum potential, and engagement with community stakeholder groups are promising approaches.
Authors: Jeffrey M Pyne; P Adam Kelly; Ellen P Fischer; Christopher J Miller; Samantha L Connolly; Patricia Wright; Kara Zamora; Christopher J Koenig; Karen H Seal; John C Fortney Journal: Psychol Serv Date: 2020-10-08
Authors: Jayamalathi Priyanka Vakkalanka; Brian C Lund; Stephan Arndt; William Field; Mary Charlton; Marcia M Ward; Ryan M Carnahan Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2021-12-18 Impact factor: 3.734
Authors: Anica Pless Kaiser; Kelly O'Malley; Jennifer Moye; Anna G Etchin; Lynn Korsun; Rachel Weiskittle; Hannah Bashian; Katherine Kemp; Zachary S Sager Journal: Prog Palliat Care Date: 2021-10-03
Authors: Andrea K Finlay; Alex H S Harris; Joel Rosenthal; Jessica Blue-Howells; Sean Clark; Bessie Flatley; Christine Timko Journal: Rural Ment Health Date: 2018-01
Authors: Travis I Lovejoy; Benjamin J Morasco; Michael I Demidenko; Thomas H A Meath; Steven K Dobscha Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Carol E Kaufman; Nancy L Asdigian; Ursula Running Bear; Janette Beals; Spero M Manson; Nancy Dailey; Byron Bair; Jay H Shore Journal: J Racial Ethn Health Disparities Date: 2020-03-18
Authors: Aaron M Norr; Andrea C Katz; Janelle L Nguyen; Keren Lehavot; Norman B Schmidt; Greg M Reger Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 3.222