Literature DB >> 27701399

An Exon-Specific U1snRNA Induces a Robust Factor IX Activity in Mice Expressing Multiple Human FIX Splicing Mutants.

Dario Balestra1, Daniela Scalet1, Franco Pagani2, Malgorzata Ewa Rogalska2, Rosella Mari3, Francesco Bernardi1,4, Mirko Pinotti1,4.   

Abstract

In cellular models we have demonstrated that a unique U1snRNA targeting an intronic region downstream of a defective exon (Exon-specific U1snRNA, ExSpeU1) can rescue multiple exon-skipping mutations, a relevant cause of genetic disease. Here, we explored in mice the ExSpeU1 U1fix9 toward two model Hemophilia B-causing mutations at the 5' (c.519A > G) or 3' (c.392-8T > G) splice sites of F9 exon 5. Hydrodynamic injection of wt-BALB/C mice with plasmids expressing the wt and mutant (hFIX-2G5'ss and hFIX-8G3'ss) splicing-competent human factor IX (hFIX) cassettes resulted in the expression of hFIX transcripts lacking exon 5 in liver, and in low plasma levels of inactive hFIX. Coinjection of U1fix9, but not of U1wt, restored exon inclusion of variants and in the intrinsically weak FIXwt context. This resulted in appreciable circulating hFIX levels (mean ± SD; hFIX-2G5'ss, 1.0 ± 0.5 µg/ml; hFIX-8G3'ss, 1.2 ± 0.3 µg/ml; and hFIXwt, 1.9 ± 0.6 µg/ml), leading to a striking shortening (from ~100 seconds of untreated mice to ~80 seconds) of FIX-dependent coagulation times, indicating a hFIX with normal specific activity. This is the first proof-of-concept in vivo that a unique ExSpeU1 can efficiently rescue gene expression impaired by distinct exon-skipping variants, which extends the applicability of ExSpeU1s to panels of mutations and thus cohort of patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27701399      PMCID: PMC5095682          DOI: 10.1038/mtna.2016.77

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids        ISSN: 2162-2531            Impact factor:   10.183


Introduction

A crucial event in the earliest splicing step involves the recognition of the donor splice site (5′ss) by the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (U1snRNP), which is driven by base-pair complementarity with the 5′ tail of its RNA component (U1snRNA).[1] Over years, variants of the U1snRNA have been exploited to manipulate pre-mRNA processing for therapeutic purposes. Modified U1snRNAs have been used to carry Hammerhead ribozymes[2] or, more frequently, as antisense molecules to induce skipping of pseudo-exons[3] or, particularly, of defective exons,[4] the latter hardly applicable to most human disease genes. Differently, our and other groups extensively exploited the physiological role of the U1snRNA to promote exon inclusion in the presence of exon-skipping mutations,[5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] a relevant cause of severe forms of human genetic disease.[18,19,20] The first generation of engineered U1snRNA had a modified 5′ tail with increased complementarity to defective 5′ss, and were shown to rescue exon inclusion in several cellular[5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,21] and also in vivo[17] disease models. However, these U1snRNAs are often tailored on the disease-causing mutation and have the intrinsic risk of off-target effects by recognizing the partially conserved donor splice site[22] in other splicing units. For this reason, we recently developed a second-generation U1snRNAs, named Exon Specific U1snRNAs (ExSpeU1s), that are designed to recognize intronic, often poorly conserved and thus gene-specific, regions downstream of the affected exon, and shown to efficiently rescue exon-skipping in different disease models,[23,24,25,26,27,28] Of great importance, in cellular cultures, a unique ExSpeU1 was able to rescue normal splicing from different type of exon-skipping mutations either at the 5′ss or acceptor splice site (3′ss), or within the exon.[23,29] Although these gene-specificity and activity ExSpeU1 features would significantly extend the applicability of a single therapeutic molecule to panels of mutations and thus cohorts of patients, a key issue when addressing the numerous diseases with heterogeneous mutational patterns (www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk), this effect of ExSpeU1s in vivo has not been investigated yet. In this study, we explored in mice the efficacy of ExSpeU1 toward exon-skipping mutations leading to Hemophilia B (HB) that is a rare X-linked hemorrhagic disorder (1/35,000 males) associated with reduced levels of factor IX (FIX), a key coagulation protein of liver origin.[30] HB represents a paradigmatic example of human disease with a heterogeneous mutational pattern comprising several splicing mutations, often associated with severe forms,[31] characterized by strong unmet medical needs. The observation that even small increase of FIX levels (>2%), quantitatively measurable by functional and protein assays in plasma, would significantly ameliorate the clinical phenotype[32] makes HB an ideal model to investigate innovative therapeutic approaches such as ExSpeU1. Through the expression in mice of two natural FIX splicing-defective variants at 5′ss or 3′ss associated with severe HB, we show that the selected ExSpeU1 efficiently rescues human FIX (hFIX) splicing in liver and results in the concurrent robust increase of hFIX protein and coagulant activity in plasma.

Results

The in vivo ability of ExSpeU1 to restore splicing impaired by exon-skipping mutations was explored in the challenging context of the FIX exon 5 that, as many other splicing units, is characterized by a very weak donor splice site and is intrinsically poorly defined (), and indeed prone to aberrant splicing. As a matter of fact, exon 5 is partially skipped even in physiological conditions, as demonstrated by the splicing pattern observed in human liver (), and completely excluded from the mature mRNA in the presence of mutations at 5′ss, 3′ss or within the exon, as indicated by cellular models.[23,29] Among these severe HB causing mutations, the c.519A > G and c.392-8T > G changes at the 5′ss or 3′ss, respectively, were chosen as models to assess in mice the active ExSpeU1 (U1fix9) targeting the intronic sequence starting at position +9 (), which has been selected through scanning for efficacy in minigene assays within a panel of ExSpeU1 designed toward the region downstream of the 5′ss of exon 9.[23]

The U1fix9 significantly rescues exon 5 inclusion of splicing-defective hFIX variants

To deliver in mouse liver the plasmids harboring the hFIX splicing-competent (pFIXwt, pFIX-2G5′ss, and pFIX-8G3′ss) and the U1snRNA (pU1fix9, pU1fix, and pU1wt) cassettes () we exploited the hydrodynamic tail-vein injection of a high volume of concentrated DNA. This physical method takes advantage of the high-pressure gradient created in liver capillaries, which enhances endothelial and parenchymal cell permeability to DNA. The injection (1.5 µg/g of mouse body weight) of the pFIXwt, pFIX-2G5′ss and pFIX-8G3′ss variants resulted in mouse liver in appreciable hFIX mRNA expression characterized, for the three expression cassettes, by hFIX transcripts lacking exon 5 (, lanes 1, 3, and 7). The hFIX mRNA was not detected in other tissues such as heart, kidney, and spleen (). Codelivery of the pU1fix9 with pFIX variants restored correct splicing of FIXwt (from negligible to 97 ± 6%, mean ± SD) and substantially rescued HB-causing variants with impaired 5′ss or 3′ss (from negligible to 85 ± 5% and 72 ± 4% for pFIX-2G5′ss and pFIX-8G3′ss, respectively). Comparable results were obtained with the coinjection of the first generation pU1fix, used as control and having perfect complementarity to the wild type FIX exon 5, 5′ss (). Conversely, coinjection of the pU1wt, mimicking the endogenous human or mouse U1snRNA, was ineffective. We performed quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) with U1fix9-specific primers to assess the expression in liver of the U1fix9, which was clearly detectable only in mice injected with the pU1fix9 (; groups 2, 6, and 10), and accounted for approximately half of the endogenous U1snRNA (U1end). Consistently, in mice injected with the pU1wt, the U1snRNA expression showed an apparent increase (1.40 over untreated mice; group 4).

The U1fix9 significantly increases circulating hFIX levels that results in remarkable improvement of FIX coagulant activity

The hFIX splicing-competent cassettes were designed to incorporate the complete hFIX coding sequence (), which enabled us to evaluate the hFIX protein secreted in mouse plasma. Expression of the pFIXwt, pFIX-2G5′ss , and pFIX-8G3′ss produced low hFIX antigen levels (0.33 ± 0.2, 0.12 ± 0.08, and 0.18 ± 0.11 µg/ml, respectively)(). Western Blotting was then exploited to investigate the circulating hFIX. In our experimental set-up, the anti-hFIX antibody recognized both human and mouse FIX, which however are distinguishable by size (). Investigations in plasma from the pFIXwt, pFIX-2G5′ss and pFIX-8G3′ss injected mice (lanes 1, 3, and 7) did not reveal appreciable amounts of the normal hFIX. When the FIX coagulant activity was assessed () we did not appreciate a shortening of the FIX-dependent coagulation times (pFIXwt 96 ± 3 seconds; pFIX-2G5′ss, 99 ± 2 seconds; pFIX-8G3′ss, 104 ± 3 seconds), as compared with control mice (101 ± 2 seconds). Coinjection of the pU1fix9 with pFIXwt or variants resulted in a significant increase of hFIX antigen levels (pFIXwt 1.9 ± 0.58 µg/ml, P < 0.0006; pFIX-2G5′ss 0.99 ± 0.48 µg/ml, P < 0.001; and pFIX-8G3′ss 1.2 ± 0.32 µg/ml, P < 0.02)() with the concurrent appearance of the full-length hFIX (). This led to a remarkable and statistically significant shortening of FIX-dependent coagulation times (P < 0.0001), with values in mice expressing the hFIX variants (pFIX-2G5′ss, 79 ± 2 seconds; pFIX-8G3′ss, 83 ± 2 seconds) resembling those for FIXwt (74 ± 4 seconds) (). Similar results were obtained by coinjection of the pU1fix, with a strong increase of hFIX antigen levels (pFIX-2G5′ss, 0.78 ± 0.38 µg/ml; pFIX-8G3′ss 1.0 ± 0.22 µg/ml), the appearance of the full-length isoform and a significant (P < 0.0001) shortening in the coagulation time (pFIX-2G5′ss, 83 ± 1 seconds; pFIX-8G3′ss, 79 ± 2 seconds). Conversely, coexpression of hFIX variants with the U1wt was ineffective. To provide a quantitative evaluation of the contribution of the rescued hFIX to coagulation times, we spiked plasma from mice expressing the FIX-2G5′ss or FIX-8G3′ss variants only with 1, 0.5 or 0.25 µg/ml of recombinant hFIX (), with the lowest concentration shortening the FIX-dependent coagulation times of 5 seconds in set up experiments. Noticeably, in plasma from mice coexpressing the hFIX variants and the U1fix9 the coagulation times was similar or shorter to those obtained by supplementation with 1 µg/ml of recombinant human FIX.

The active U1fix9 does not act through an antisense mechanism

To investigate whether the U1fix9 acts by masking an intronic splicing silencer we used two well-established antisense molecules, namely antisense oligoribonucleotides and the U7 snRNA particle,[33] which were designed to bind to the U1fix9 target sequence (AONfix20, AONfix25, and U7fix9). As shown in , in cells cotransfected with FIX minigenes harboring the model exon-skipping mutations and the antisense molecules did not result, at variance from the U1fix9, in appreciable exon inclusion. The cellular models also prompted us to evaluate the splicing patterns of five putative U1fix9 off-target genes (ADRGE 2; TANC2; PLEKHB1; COL21A1, and TNIP3 genes) that were predicted by a megaBLAST analysis on the human genome and transcripts database (Human genomic plus transcript; Human G+T) using the 5′tctgaataagat3 ′ sequence harboring the U1fix9 target. The reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) analysis in human embryonic kidney (HEK293) transfected with the pU1fix9 did not reveal significant splicing changes for all genes displaying an appreciable expression (see Supplementary Figure S1).

Discussion

In this study, by using splicing-defective hFIX expression as model, we evaluated the in vivo efficacy of ExSpeU1s toward multiple mutations, a RNA-based approach that could represent a powerful alternative to replacement gene therapy, especially when the regulation and/or the size of the affected gene make it hardly feasible. The U1snRNA-based technology acts at post-transcriptional levels thus maintaining the transcriptional gene regulation in physiologic tissues, and takes advantage of a very small therapeutic transgene (~600 bp) that can be packaged in virtually any viral vector successfully exploited for gene therapy purposes.[34] Furthermore, the ExSpeU1 expression is driven by its strong ubiquitous promoter, and in the model of Spinal Muscular Atrophy a single ExSpeU1 copy was shown to trigger an appreciable rescue,[25,28] which could lead to the use of low doses of viral vector to achieve a therapeutic impact. On the other hand, we are aware that ExSpeU1, like other personalized approaches based on the mutation type, must cope with the fact that many diseases, such as HB, have highly heterogeneous mutational patterns. In fact, skipping of a given exon is a relatively frequent pathogenic mechanism that can be caused by several different mutations either at the 5′ss or 3′ss, or within the exon, which could weaken the applicability of the modified U1snRNA. Here, we explored a single ExSpeU1 (U1fix9) toward two model exon-skipping mutations at the opposite 5′ss (c.519A>G) or 3′ss (c.392-8T>G) positions in the FIX exon 5 context. The inability of antisense oligoribonucleotides and modified U7snRNA masking the U1fix9 target sequence to rescue exon 5 inclusions indicated that the U1fix9 is not acting through an antisense mechanism on a functional intronic negative regulatory element. Moreover, we have very recently demonstrated that the U1fix9, as well as other active ExSpeU1s in different human disease models, binds to the intronic sequence downstream of the 5′ss and results in the assembly of a target-specific therapeutic U1-like particle.[28] This modified U1snRNP restores the spliceosomal activity on the skipped exons, mainly through its associated 70K protein and stem loop IV, an effect that does not require the endogenous U1 snRNP. To assess the ability of ExSpeU1 in restoring splicing in mice, we exploited the hydrodynamic injection to drive the transient expression of the splicing-defective hFIX cassettes harboring the model mutations and of U1fix9. Interestingly, even in the presence of the nonliver specific SV40 promoter, the hydrodynamic tail-vein injection approach guaranteed an appreciable delivery of plasmid DNA with an appreciable expression of the hFIX transgene mainly in liver. It is worth nothing that species-specific nucleic acid amplification and immunologic assays, distinguishing hFIX from murine FIX, enabled us to evaluate the hFIX in wild-type mice without the confounding effects of the endogenous murine FIX, as indicated by the undetectable hFIX transcripts and protein in untreated mice. Moreover, activated partial thromboplastin time-based coagulation assays were optimized to assess the additive effect of hFIX to the endogenous murine one. Overall, these features provided us with an informative phenotype after treatment and thus a straightforward strategy to overcome the lack of mouse models for the HB mutations under investigation.[35] The use in mice of the strong SV40 promoter instead of the physiological one might have further promoted exon-skipping of the minigene, which contains a poorly defined exon. As a matter of fact, mRNA splicing and RNA polymerase II elongation rate/processivity are intricately intertwined, with a highly elongating pol II (SV40 promoter) favoring exon exclusion, and vice versa.[36] Notwithstanding the unfavorable exon 5 context, the coexpression of the ExSpeU1 U1fix9, as clearly demonstrated by U1fix9-specific PCR, was able to remarkably recover exon inclusion in the FIXwt and, most importantly, in the presence of the defective 5′ss or 3′ss. Moreover, the strong rescue effect was comparable to that of the first generation U1fix directly targeting the 5′ss. Conversely, the U1wt was ineffective, thus highlighting the crucial role of the engineered U1snRNA 5′s tail in defining both target recognition and splicing correction. A mandatory issue to evaluate the therapeutic potential of an approach is to assess the impact on protein levels and particularly on the activity in the affected pathway. Consistently, in mice treated with the pU1fix9, we measured a remarkable increase of circulating hFIX protein, and the appearance of the full-length protein isoform. Most importantly, this resulted in a robust shortening (15–20 seconds) in the coagulation times produced by the increase of hFIX protein endorsed of a normal specific activity. From this observation, it is tempting to speculate that the rescue extent would be beneficial if translated in the severe HB patients in whom the therapeutic threshold is rather low. A second mandatory issue is represented by the specificity of the therapeutic molecules toward the pre-mRNA target, which is hardly predictable by computational tools. With the limitations of not taking into account the functional relevance of incomplete base pairing of the U1snRNA with pre-mRNA, and particularly the crucial interplay with the several splicing factors needed for the assembly of a functional spliceosome, our bioinformatics analysis returned five candidate off-target mRNAs. Interestingly, the RT-PCR investigation in a human cell line transfected with the U1fix9 did not reveal a major impact on their splicing pattern. Although these data need to be extended by high-throughput RNA-seq, they appear to be consistent with our very recent data obtained with ExSpeU1 in the mouse model of Spinal Muscular Atrophy, which revealed gene expression changes in only 12 off-targets genes.[28] Overall these observations support gene-specific features of ExSpeU1s, which would favor the translation into clinic. Taken together these findings indicated that multiple HB splicing-defective variants causing exon-skipping could be efficiently rescued in vivo by a single ExSpeU1, able to promote appreciable synthesis of hFIX endorsed of a normal coagulant activity. In conclusion, albeit our mouse models permit the assessment of the impact on coagulation phenotype and not on provoked bleeding, which will require the creation of splicing-specific HB mouse models and ExSpeU1 delivery through adeno-associated viruses,[17] and despite the unfavorable FIX exon 5 definition, these data provide the first proof-of-concept about the in vivo properties of ExSpeU1s, which substantially extends their applicability.

Materials and methods

Minigene assays. Expression vectors, transfections and RT-PCR were conducted as previously described.[23] Modified U7 snRNA was created by PCR amplification of U7SmOPT vector using FIXsh9U7 (5′ACAGAGGCCTTTCCGCAAATCTTATTCAATTTTTGG3 ′) and Sp6 (5′ATTTAGGTGACACTATAG3 ′) primers. PCR products were digested with HindIII and StuI and ligated into HindIII/StuI sites of the U7SmOPT vector. Clones were verified by the sequence analysis. ASOfix20 (5′ucuuuaaaaaaucuuauuca3′) and ASOfix25 (5′gauuuucuuuaaaaaaucuuauuca3′) contain 2′-O-methyl modified ribonucleotides and full-length phosphorothioate backbone.[37] Expression vectors, delivery in mice and sampling. Expression vectors for the (i) splicing-competent hFIX cDNA cassette, either wild-type (pFIXwt) or mutated (pFIX-2G5′ss; pFIX-8G3′ss), or ii) the U1snRNA, either wild-type (pU1wt) or engineered (pU1fix9, pU1fix) were previously reported.[23] Eight-week-old BALB/C mice were injected hydrodynamically injected with plasmid DNA in 2.5 ml phosphate buffer saline (PBS) through the tail vein. Blood samples were collected from the retro-orbital plexus into 3.8% sodium citrate 48 hours postinjection. Upon sacrifice, total RNA was isolated from random sections of mouse liver using TRIZOL reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA). All procedures were approved and conducted under the guidelines established by the Italian Ministry of Health. Evaluation of hFIX mRNA and U1 expression. Two micrograms of RNA from mouse tissues were retro-transcribed using SuperScript III Reverse Transcriptase (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA) with random primers and subsequently PCR amplified with hFIX-specific primers 5′ATTCCTATGAATGTTGGTGTCCCT3′ (4F) and 5′GGGTGCTTTGAGTGATG TTATCCAA3′ (6R). The PCR was run for 40 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds, 60°C for 20 seconds, and 72°C for 30 seconds. Evaluation of U1snRNA expression was carried out using U1 specific primers 5′AGATCTGATACTTACCTG3′ (U1wtF), 5′AGATCTCATTCTTATTCAG3′ (U1fix9F), and 5′GAACGCAGTCCCCCACTACCAC3′ (U1R). The efficiency of the Syber-Green (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Redmond, WA) based qPCR reactions for U1wt and U1fix9 has been calculated by using U1snRNA-encoding plasmid DNA and the following equation: Efficiency (E) = 10(−1/slope). A melting curve analysis showing a single, product specific melting temperature was performed to document the specificity of qPCR reactions. The quantification of U1snRNA was normalized for the mouse GAPDH. qPCR reactions for U1 and mouse GAPDH were carried out to 56°C and 60°C, respectively. Relative expression ratio of U1snRNAs was calculated based on E and Cp variation following the equation: R = (Etarget)Δ/(Eref)Δ (ref. 38). Assessment of hFIX antigen, protein isoforms, and coagulant activity. Human FIX antigen levels and isoforms in plasma were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Affinity Biologicals, Ancaster, Canada) and Western blotting exploiting a polyclonal anti-hFIX antibody (GAFIX-AP; Affinity Biologicals, Ancaster, Canada). FIX coagulant activity was assessed by coagulation assays based on the activated partial thromboplastin time. Assays with serial dilution of mouse plasma spiked with recombinant hFIX were conducted to optimize the protocol and magnify the additive effect of hFIX to the endogenous murine one. In the final setting, mouse plasma was diluted 1:200 in Imidazole buffer and mixed 1:1 with hFIX-deficient plasma (George King, Bio-Medical, Overland Park, KS) before adding the activator SynthASil reagent (HemosIL, Instrumentation Laboratory, Lexington, MA) and calcium. Coagulation times were recorded by the ACLTOP 700 instrument (HemosIL, Instrumentation Laboratory). Statistical analysis. Statistical differences among levels were evaluated by a Student′s t-test with a P < 0.05 considered significant. Figure S1. Evaluation of alternative splicing patterns of putative off-target mRNAs of U1fix9 in HEK293 cells.
  37 in total

Review 1.  Pre-mRNA splicing and human disease.

Authors:  Nuno André Faustino; Thomas A Cooper
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 11.361

Review 2.  Transcriptional elongation and alternative splicing.

Authors:  Gwendal Dujardin; Celina Lafaille; Ezequiel Petrillo; Valeria Buggiano; Luciana I Gómez Acuña; Ana Fiszbein; Micaela A Godoy Herz; Nicolás Nieto Moreno; Manuel J Muñoz; Mariano Alló; Ignacio E Schor; Alberto R Kornblihtt
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2012-09-07

3.  Correct mRNA processing at a mutant TT splice donor in FANCC ameliorates the clinical phenotype in patients and is enhanced by delivery of suppressor U1 snRNAs.

Authors:  Linda Hartmann; Kornelia Neveling; Stephanie Borkens; Hildegard Schneider; Marcel Freund; Elke Grassman; Stephan Theiss; Angela Wawer; Stefan Burdach; Arleen D Auerbach; Detlev Schindler; Helmut Hanenberg; Heiner Schaal
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Gene therapeutic approach using mutation-adapted U1 snRNA to correct a RPGR splice defect in patient-derived cells.

Authors:  Esther Glaus; Fabian Schmid; Romain Da Costa; Wolfgang Berger; John Neidhardt
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2011-02-15       Impact factor: 11.454

5.  Haemophilia B: database of point mutations and short additions and deletions--eighth edition.

Authors:  F Giannelli; P M Green; S S Sommer; M Poon; M Ludwig; R Schwaab; P H Reitsma; M Goossens; A Yoshioka; M S Figueiredo; G G Brownlee
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  An exon-specific U1 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) strategy to correct splicing defects.

Authors:  Eugenio Fernandez Alanis; Mirko Pinotti; Andrea Dal Mas; Dario Balestra; Nicola Cavallari; Malgorzata E Rogalska; Francesco Bernardi; Franco Pagani
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Spinal muscular atrophy phenotype is ameliorated in human motor neurons by SMN increase via different novel RNA therapeutic approaches.

Authors:  Monica Nizzardo; Chiara Simone; Sara Dametti; Sabrina Salani; Gianna Ulzi; Serena Pagliarani; Federica Rizzo; Emanuele Frattini; Franco Pagani; Nereo Bresolin; Giacomo Comi; Stefania Corti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-06-30       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Pick one, but be quick: 5' splice sites and the problems of too many choices.

Authors:  Xavier Roca; Adrian R Krainer; Ian C Eperon
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 11.361

9.  Aberrant 5' splice sites in human disease genes: mutation pattern, nucleotide structure and comparison of computational tools that predict their utilization.

Authors:  Emanuele Buratti; Martin Chivers; Jana Královicová; Maurizio Romano; Marco Baralle; Adrian R Krainer; Igor Vorechovsky
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-06-18       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  An engineered U1 small nuclear RNA rescues splicing defective coagulation F7 gene expression in mice.

Authors:  D Balestra; A Faella; P Margaritis; N Cavallari; F Pagani; F Bernardi; V R Arruda; M Pinotti
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 5.824

View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Therapeutic approaches to treat human spliceosomal diseases.

Authors:  Anthony B DeNicola; Yi Tang
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 2.  A novel role of U1 snRNP: Splice site selection from a distance.

Authors:  Ravindra N Singh; Natalia N Singh
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Gene Regul Mech       Date:  2019-04-28       Impact factor: 4.490

Review 3.  RNA Splicing and Disease: Animal Models to Therapies.

Authors:  Matías Montes; Brianne L Sanford; Daniel F Comiskey; Dawn S Chandler
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 11.639

4.  Profiling of cis- and trans-acting factors supporting noncanonical splice site activation.

Authors:  Steffen Erkelenz; Gereon Poschmann; Johannes Ptok; Lisa Müller; Heiner Schaal
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 4.652

5.  Rescue of a familial dysautonomia mouse model by AAV9-Exon-specific U1 snRNA.

Authors:  Giulia Romano; Federico Riccardi; Erica Bussani; Simone Vodret; Danilo Licastro; Isabella Ragone; Giuseppe Ronzitti; Elisabetta Morini; Susan A Slaugenhaupt; Franco Pagani
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 11.043

6.  The somatic FAH C.1061C>A change counteracts the frequent FAH c.1062+5G>A mutation and permits U1snRNA-based splicing correction.

Authors:  Daniela Scalet; Claudia Sacchetto; Francesco Bernardi; Mirko Pinotti; Stan F J van de Graaf; Dario Balestra
Journal:  J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 3.172

7.  Exon-specific U1 snRNAs improve ELP1 exon 20 definition and rescue ELP1 protein expression in a familial dysautonomia mouse model.

Authors:  Irving Donadon; Mirko Pinotti; Katarzyna Rajkowska; Giulia Pianigiani; Elena Barbon; Elisabetta Morini; Helena Motaln; Boris Rogelj; Federico Mingozzi; Susan A Slaugenhaupt; Franco Pagani
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2018-07-15       Impact factor: 6.150

8.  Splicing Mutations Impairing CDKL5 Expression and Activity Can be Efficiently Rescued by U1snRNA-Based Therapy.

Authors:  Dario Balestra; Domenico Giorgio; Matteo Bizzotto; Maria Fazzari; Bruria Ben Zeev; Mirko Pinotti; Nicoletta Landsberger; Angelisa Frasca
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2019-08-24       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  Splicing dysregulation contributes to the pathogenicity of several F9 exonic point variants.

Authors:  Upendra K Katneni; Aaron Liss; David Holcomb; Nobuko H Katagiri; Ryan Hunt; Haim Bar; Amra Ismail; Anton A Komar; Chava Kimchi-Sarfaty
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2019-06-30       Impact factor: 2.183

10.  A Compensatory U1snRNA Partially Rescues FAH Splicing and Protein Expression in a Splicing-Defective Mouse Model of Tyrosinemia Type I.

Authors:  Dario Balestra; Daniela Scalet; Mattia Ferrarese; Silvia Lombardi; Nicole Ziliotto; Chrystal C Croes; Naomi Petersen; Piter Bosma; Federico Riccardi; Franco Pagani; Mirko Pinotti; Stan F J van de Graaf
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-20       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.