Literature DB >> 27699558

Item Cloning Variation and the Impact on the Parameters of Response Models.

Quinn N Lathrop1, Ying Cheng2.   

Abstract

Item cloning is increasingly used to generate slight differences in tasks for use in psychological experiments and educational assessments. This paper investigates the psychometric issues that arise when item cloning introduces variation into the difficulty parameters of the item clones. Four models are proposed and evaluated in simulation studies with conditions representing possible types of variation due to item cloning. Depending on the model specified, unaccounted variance in the item clone difficulties propagates to other parameters in the model, causing specific and predictable patterns of bias. Person parameters are largely unaffected by the choice of model, but for inferences related to the item parameters, the choice is critical and can even be leveraged to identify problematic item cloning.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MCMC; explanatory IRT; item cloning; item response theory; multilevel IRT

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27699558     DOI: 10.1007/s11336-016-9513-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychometrika        ISSN: 0033-3123            Impact factor:   2.500


  2 in total

1.  Recreating Raven's: software for systematically generating large numbers of Raven-like matrix problems with normed properties.

Authors:  Laura E Matzen; Zachary O Benz; Kevin R Dixon; Jamie Posey; James K Kroger; Ann E Speed
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2010-05

2.  Additive multilevel item structure models with random residuals: item modeling for explanation and item generation.

Authors:  Sun-Joo Cho; Paul De Boeck; Susan Embretson; Sophia Rabe-Hesketh
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 2.500

  2 in total
  2 in total

1.  Applying modern psychometric techniques to melodic discrimination testing: Item response theory, computerised adaptive testing, and automatic item generation.

Authors:  Peter M C Harrison; Tom Collins; Daniel Müllensiefen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Upon Repeated Reflection: Consequences of Frequent Exposure to the Cognitive Reflection Test for Mechanical Turk Participants.

Authors:  Jan K Woike
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-12-06
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.