| Literature DB >> 27698898 |
Yong-Qiang Zhang1, Wei-Ya Wang2, Jian-Xin Xue3, Yan Xu1, Ping Fan1, Bennett Adam Caughey4, Wei-Wei Tan1, Gui-Qun Cao5, Li-Li Jiang2, You Lu3, Kang Zhang6, Xun Hu1.
Abstract
According to the reclassification of lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) proposed in 2011, solid predominant lung adenocarcinoma (SPA) has been associated with poor outcomes for LAC patients. However, the prognostic value of the presence of solid subtype remains unclear. Besides, there is little data about the roles of microRNA (miRNA) in solid subtype of LAC. In this study, 243 LAC patients were classified into solid subtype positive and negative groups (S+ LAC, n=134 and S- LAC, n=109) according to whether the solid subtype was more than 5% of the tumor component or not. We analyzed the relationship between solid subtype and patients' outcome by univariate and multivariate analyses. Solid subtype was proved to be significantly associated with the 5-year overall survival and played as an independent prognostic factor for stage I-III invasive LAC patients. Then miRNA microarray was used to identify differentially expressed miRNAs in solid subtype, resulting in 31 differential miRNAs. Quantitative reverse transcription-PCR (QRT-PCR) was used to validate 4 key miRNAs (miR-133b, miR-155-5p, miR-124-3p, miR-145-5p). Further, CCK-8 and transwell assays were performed to validate the impact of one dysregulated miRNA (miR-133b) on LAC cell function. Interestingly, while miR-133b could significantly inhibit the proliferation of A549 and SPC-A1, it showed no effect on the migration or invasion of LAC cell lines. These results suggest that solid subtype can exert independent prognostic impact on LAC patients, and 4 important dysregulated miRNAs in solid subtype of LAC may be involved in the malignancy of S+LAC, thus may further have clinical perspective for S+ LAC in the future.Entities:
Keywords: Lung adenocarcinoma; Prognosis; Solid subtype; microRNA (miRNA).; stage I-III
Year: 2016 PMID: 27698898 PMCID: PMC5039382 DOI: 10.7150/jca.14923
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Cancer ISSN: 1837-9664 Impact factor: 4.207
Figure 1Representative pathology images of subtypes of invasive LAC according to the reclassification system of 2011. (A) Lepidic (HE, ×60), (B) Acinar (HE, ×100), (C) Solid (HE, ×100), (D) papillary (HE, ×150), (E) Micropapillary (HE, ×200).
Primers of 4 miRNAs used for qPCR reaction
| Name | Primer Sequence |
|---|---|
| Universal Primer | Provided by Qiagen |
| U6 | CAAGGATGACACGCAAATTCG |
| hsa-miR-145-5p | GTCCAGTTTTCCCAGGAATCCCT |
| hsa-miR-133b | TTTGGTCCCCTTCAACCAGCTA |
| hsa-miR-124-3p | TAAGGCACGCGGTGAATGCC |
| hsa-miR-155-5p | TTAATGCTAATCGTGATAGGGGT |
Clinical characteristics of 255 patients with resected stage I-III invasive LACs according to the IASLC/ATS/ERS reclassification
| Acinar | Papillary | Solid | Lepidic | Micropapillary | Variant | Sum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||||||
| Men | 32 | 28 | 42 | 15 | 2 | 5 | 124(48.6%) |
| Women | 46 | 39 | 26 | 15 | 3 | 2 | 131 (51.4%) |
| Age | |||||||
| ≤60 | 46 | 35 | 43 | 20 | 3 | 6 | 153(60%) |
| >60 | 32 | 32 | 25 | 10 | 2 | 1 | 102(40%) |
| Smoking status | |||||||
| Smoking | 26 | 17 | 38 | 9 | 0 | 4 | 94 (36.9%) |
| Nonsmoking | 52 | 50 | 30 | 21 | 5 | 3 | 161(63.1%) |
| MTD | |||||||
| ≤3cm | 38 | 33 | 22 | 16 | 1 | 110(43.1%) | |
| >3cm,≤5cm | 28 | 24 | 33 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 100(39.2%) |
| >5cm | 12 | 10 | 13 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 45(17.6%) |
| Clinical stage | |||||||
| Stage I | 21 | 33 | 18 | 13 | 1 | 86(33.7%) | |
| Stage II | 22 | 15 | 23 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 72(28.2%) |
| stage III | 35 | 19 | 27 | 9 | 3 | 4 | 97(38.0%) |
| Bronchial stump | |||||||
| Positive | 3 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 12 (4.7%) | |
| Negative | 75 | 65 | 64 | 28 | 4 | 7 | 243(95.3%) (95.3%) |
LAC, lung adenocarcinoma; MTD, Maximum tumor diameter.
Clinical characteristics associated with the presence of solid subtype (n=243)
| Clinical characteristics | S+ LAC | S- LAC | Sum | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||||
| Men | 68 | 49 | 117 | 0.369 |
| Women | 66 | 60 | 126 | |
| Age | 0.142 | |||
| ≤60 | 85 | 59 | 144 | |
| >60 | 49 | 50 | 99 | |
| Smoking status | 0.006 | |||
| Smoking | 60 | 30 | 90 | |
| Nonsmoking | 74 | 79 | 153 | |
| Clinical stage | 0.011 | |||
| Stage I | 36 | 49 | 85 | |
| Stage II | 44 | 24 | 68 | |
| Stage III | 54 | 36 | 90 | |
| Bronchial stump | 0.562 | |||
| Positive | 7 | 4 | 11 | |
| Negative | 127 | 105 | 232 | |
| MTD | 0.723 | |||
| ≤3cm | 55 | 52 | 109 | |
| >3cm, ≤5cm | 54 | 40 | 94 | |
| >5cm | 23 | 17 | 40 |
S+ LAC, solid subtype positive LAC; S- LAC, solid subtype negative LAC.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of the correlation of clinical characteristics with 5-year OS (n=243)
| Clinical characteristic | NO. of patients | 5-year OS | Multivariate Analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95% CI) | ||||||
| Sex | 0.599 | Not included in the multivariate analysis | ||||
| Men | 115 | 45.7% | ||||
| Women | 124 | 47.2% | ||||
| Age | 0.843 | Not included in the multivariate analysis | ||||
| ≤60 | 143 | 69.9.0% | ||||
| >60 | 96 | 42.9% | ||||
| Smoking status | 0.382 | Not included in the multivariate analysis | ||||
| Smoking | 89 | 44.6% | ||||
| Nonsmoking | 150 | 47.1% | ||||
| Clinical stage | 0.000 | 1.530(1.176-1.989) | 0.002 | |||
| Stage I | 83 | 59.6% | ||||
| Stage II | 67 | 52.0% | ||||
| Stage III | 89 | 30.3% | ||||
| Bronchial stump | 0.000 | 3.627(1.811-7.267) | 0.000 | |||
| Positive | 11 | 0.0% | ||||
| Negative | 228 | 48.8% | ||||
| MTD | 0.027 | 1.218(0.936-1.584) | 0.142 | |||
| ≤3cm | 108 | 56.6% | ||||
| >3cm, ≤5cm | 91 | 49.2% | ||||
| >5cm | 40 | 27.1% | ||||
| subtype | 0.010 | 0.627(0.415-0.948) | 0.027 | |||
| S+ LAC | 134 | 40.3% | ||||
| S- LAC | 105 | 53.4% | ||||
The 5 year-OS of 4 cases were lost. 5-year OS, 5-year overall survival; HR, hazard ratio; 95% CI, 95% confidence. interval
Figure 2Kaplan-Meier survival plot for OS according to the presence of solid subtype, maximum tumor diameter (MTD), clinical stage, and invasion of the bronchial stump. (A), solid subtype; (B), MTD (C); clinical stage; (D), bronchial stump.
Figure 331 miRNAs showing significantly differential expression between solid subtype and paired normal clinical samples. SPC01-SPC05, solid subtype tissue samples. SPN0-SPN1, paired normal clinical samples.
Figure 4Validation of 4 key dysregulated miRNAs using QRT-PCR. (A) shows hotpot genes in lung cancer that were targeted by 4 key miRNAs. (B) Relative expression levels of 4 key miRNAs between solid LAC subtype and paired normal samples (n=26). Bar graph represents the fold change of log2 values between cancer and paired normal samples ((normalized with the inner control, U6). p<0.05 for all 4 miRNAs.
Figure 5Overexpression of miR-133b can significantly suppress the proliferation of A549 and SPC-A1. (A) The transfection rate of miR-133b was evaluated by a FAM reporter assay using the miR-NC-FAM; (B)CCK-8 assay showed decreased proliferation viability of A549 and SPC-A1 in the miR-133b transfected group compared with miR-NC or blank groups.The OD values were checked 48h after transfection and were normalized to media control. Data are shown as mean OD ± SD from 3 independent experiments. p<0.05 significance was analyzed by one-way ANOVA.