| Literature DB >> 27698763 |
Xiao-Jun Wu1, Feng Gao1, Xu Liu1, Qing Zhao1.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to observe the clinical efficacy and safety of recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) combined with compound anisodine in treating central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO). Forty-eight patients diagnosed with CRAO were randomly divided into a treatment group (24 cases) and a control group (24 cases). For the control group, nitroglycerin, 654-2, methazolamide, puerarin and compound anisodine were used for the treatment, along with oxygen, massage and other conventional treatments. Besides conventional therapy, the treatment group was also given intravenous rt-PA thrombolysis. Visual acuity, fundus oculi, visual field changes were taken as indicators for efficacy evaluation. It was found that the total effective rate of the control group was 70.83%, while that for the treatment group was 91.67%, and the comparative difference between the two groups was of statistical significance (p<0.05). The visual field defect of the control group after treatment was approximately 74.26±12.91%, and the visual field defect of the treatment group after treatment approximately 35.08±16.33%; thus, the comparative difference was statistically significant (p<0.01). The comparative difference of the original contents of fibrous protein in blood in the treatment group before and after treatment was statistically significant (p<0.01). In conclusion, the result show that intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA combined with compound anisodine is safe and effective in treating CRAO, which can significantly improve the prognosis of patients.Entities:
Keywords: acute central retinal artery occlusion; compound anisodine; intravenous thrombolysis; recombinant tissue plasminogen activator
Year: 2016 PMID: 27698763 PMCID: PMC5038466 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3681
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Comparison of the clinical efficacy of the two groups (n, %).
| Group | n | Cured | Markedly effective | Effective | Ineffective | Total effective |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | 24 | 3 (12.5) | 13 (54.16) | 6 ( | 2 (8.3) | 22 (91.67) |
| Control | 24 | 1 (4.17) | 6 ( | 10 (41.67) | 7 (29.17) | 17 (70.83) |
Comparison of visual acuity between two groups before and after treatment (eye).
| Before/after treatment | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | n | No LP | LP-0.02 | 0.02–0.1 | 0.1–0.3 | 0.3–0.5 | >0.5 |
| Treatment | 24 | 1/1 | 13/2 | 5/4 | 3/6 | 2/7 | 0/4 |
| Control | 24 | 0/0 | 11/8 | 8/5 | 4/6 | 1/3 | 0/2 |