Literature DB >> 27698579

Anatomical and morphological spine variation in Gymnocalycium kieslingii subsp. castaneum (Cactaceae).

Roman Gebauer1, Radomír Řepka1, Radek Šmudla1, Miroslava Mamoňová2, Jaroslav Ďurkovič3.   

Abstract

Although spine variation within cacti species or populations is assumed to be large, the minimum sample size of different spine anatomical and morphological traits required for species description is less studied. There are studies where only 2 spines were used for taxonomical comparison amnog species. Therefore, the spine structure variation within areoles and individuals of one population of Gymnocalycium kieslingii subsp. castaneum (Ferrari) Slaba was analyzed. Fifteen plants were selected and from each plant one areole from the basal, middle and upper part of the plant body was sampled. A scanning electron microscopy was used for spine surface description and a light microscopy for measurements of spine width, thickness, cross-section area, fiber diameter and fiber cell wall thickness. The spine surface was more visible and damaged less in the upper part of the plant body than in the basal part. Large spine and fiber differences were found between upper and lower parts of the plant body, but also within single areoles. In general, the examined traits in the upper part had by 8-17% higher values than in the lower parts. The variation of spine and fiber traits within areoles was lower than the differences between individuals. The minimum sample size was largely influenced by the studied spine and fiber traits, ranging from 1 to 70 spines. The results provide pioneer information useful in spine sample collection in the field for taxonomical, biomechanical and structural studies. Nevertheless, similar studies should be carried out for other cacti species to make generalizations. The large spine and fiber variation within areoles observed in our study indicates a very complex spine morphogenesis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Areole; fiber; minimum sample size; spine cross-section; spine morphogenesis; spine surface

Year:  2016        PMID: 27698579      PMCID: PMC5029135          DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.69.8847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PhytoKeys        ISSN: 1314-2003            Impact factor:   1.635


  7 in total

1.  Spine micromorphology of normal and hyperhydric Mammillaria gracilis Pfeiff. (Cactaceae) shoots.

Authors:  P Peharec; H Posilović; B Balen; M Krsnik-Rasol
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 1.758

Review 2.  Structure-function relationships in highly modified shoots of cactaceae.

Authors:  James D Mauseth
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 4.357

3.  Arabinan-cellulose composite in Opuntia ficus-indica prickly pear spines.

Authors:  M R Vignon; L Heux; M-E Malainine; M Mahrouz
Journal:  Carbohydr Res       Date:  2004-01-02       Impact factor: 2.104

4.  Past climate changes and ecophysiological responses recorded in the isotope ratios of saguaro cactus spines.

Authors:  Nathan B English; David L Dettman; Darren R Sandquist; David G Williams
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-08-28       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  The effect of cactus spines on light interception and Photosystem II for three sympatric species of Opuntia from the Mojave Desert.

Authors:  Michael E Loik
Journal:  Physiol Plant       Date:  2008-04-11       Impact factor: 4.500

6.  Geographic distribution and taxonomic circumscription of populations within Coryphantha section Robustispina (Cactaceae).

Authors:  Marc A Baker; Charles A Butterworth
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  A multi-structural and multi-functional integrated fog collection system in cactus.

Authors:  Jie Ju; Hao Bai; Yongmei Zheng; Tianyi Zhao; Ruochen Fang; Lei Jiang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.