| Literature DB >> 27698541 |
Xiao-Xing Chi1, Tao Zhang2, Dong-Jie Zhang1, Wei Yu3, Qiu-Ying Wang4, Jing-Long Zhen1.
Abstract
In this study, we examined the association between soy isoflavones and lipid profiles, apolipoprotein levels in patients with type 2 diabetes in China. The study population was composed of 120 cases (80 women with type 2 diabetes and 40 healthy women). Objects in treatment group received isoflavones 435 mg/day for 2 months, then lipid profiles were analyzed by the colorimetry method and apolipoprotein levels were determined by immune turbidimetric method. And all the indexes were determined after oral glucose tolerance test. The levels of total cholesterol, triglyceride and LDL-C significantly reduced and the levels of HDL-C and apolipoprotein A1 significantly raised in the treatment group after intervention (p<0.05). After oral glucose tolerance test, the level of total cholesterol was lower at postprandial 6 h than at empty stomach in treatment group, it had significantly difference (p<0.05). LDL-C levels in the treatment group not only decreased after intervention, but also was significantly lower at postprandial 4, 6 h than in non-intervention group. The ratio of apolipoprotein A1/apolipoprotein B at postprandial 2 h was the highest after treatment in isoflavone group. Supplementation with 435 mg/day of isoflavones exerted favorable effect on the blood total cholesterol, LDL-C levels and the ratio of apolipoprotein A1/apolipoprotein B in Chinese type 2 diabetes women.Entities:
Keywords: China; apolipoprotein; isoflavones; lipid profiles; type 2 diabetes
Year: 2016 PMID: 27698541 PMCID: PMC5018568 DOI: 10.3164/jcbn.15-147
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Biochem Nutr ISSN: 0912-0009 Impact factor: 3.114
Baseline characteristics of the participants with type 2 diabetes and the controls (mean ± SD)
| Groups | Age (years old) | Height (cm) | Weight (kg) | Body mass index (kg/m2) | Waist circumference (cm) | Hip circumference (cm) | Waist to hip ratio | Fasting blood glucose level (mmol/L) | Glycosylated serum protein level (µg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG | 46.5 ± 13.8 | 162.36 ± 2.81 | 62.52 ± 3.71 | 23.70 ± 0.89 | 89.45 ± 3.13 | 95.37 ± 3.09 | 0.94 ± 0.05 | 5.01 ± 0.36 | 162.3 ± 28.36 |
| DM-NIG | 48.5 ± 13.1 | 164.58 ± 3.71 | 62.49 ± 2.84 | 23.07 ± 0.72 | 87.95 ± 2.04 | 95.98 ± 2.11 | 0.92 ± 0.03 | 10.33 ± 2.32 | 234.5 ± 65.32 |
| Iso-G | 54.87 ± 8.97 | 161.08 ± 3.03 | 63.38 ± 2.48 | 24.43 ± 0.87 | 90.45 ± 3.18 | 97.81 ± 2.10 | 0.92 ± 0.02 | 9.86 ± 4.53 | 238.64 ± 57.25 |
Experimental conditions and treatment procedures are given in Materials and Methods. Graph depicts (mean ± SD).
Levels of lipid profiles and apolipoprotein levels before and after intervention (mean ± SD)
| Groups | TC (mmol/L) | TG (mmol/L) | LDL-C (mmol/L) | HDL-C (mmol/L) | ApoA1 (g/L) | ApoB (g/L) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG | Before | 4.71 ± 1.21 | 1.77 ± 1.17 | 2.68 ± 0.74 | 1.45 ± 0.42 | 1.15 ± 0.18 | 0.58 ± 0.14 |
| After | 4.69 ± 1.04 | 1.71 ± 0.7 | 2.69 ± 0.57 | 1.59 ± 0.26 | 1.15 ± 0.16 | 0.61 ± 0.15 | |
| DM-NIG | Before | 4.98 ± 0.86 | 1.87 ± 1.02 | 2.63 ± 0.38 | 1.52 ± 0.53 | 1.12 ± 0.19 | 0.58 ± 0.17 |
| After | 4.78 ± 0.98 | 1.56 ± 0.88 | 2.57 ± 0.43 | 1.53 ± 0.23 | 1.15 ± 0.14 | 0.59 ± 0.16 | |
| Iso-G | Before | 5.12 ± 1.21 | 1.97 ± 1.17 | 2.78 ± 0.74 | 1.35 ± 0.42 | 1.05 ± 0.18 | 0.54 ± 0.14 |
| After | 4.79 ± 1.04 | 1.49 ± 0.7 | 2.39 ± 0.57 | 1.52 ± 0.56 | 1.18 ± 0.18 | 0.63 ± 0.15 |
Experimental conditions and treatment procedures are given in Materials and Methods. Graph depicts (mean ± SD). Asterisk means significant against before intervention (*p<0.05), t test.
Fig. 1Levels of TG (A), TC (B), HDL-C (C) and LDL-C (D) in each group after OGTT are shown. Experimental conditions and treatment procedures are given in Materials and Methods. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ap<0.05 compared with CG, bp<0.05 compared with empty stomach, cp<0.05 compared with DM-NIG.
Fig. 2Levels of ApoA1 in each group after OGTT are shown. Experimental conditions and treatment procedures are given in Materials and Methods. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ap<0.05 compared with CG, bp<0.05 compared with empty stomach, cp<0.05 compared with DM-NIG.
Fig. 3Levels of ApoB in each group after OGTT are shown. Experimental conditions and treatment procedures are given in Materials and Methods. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ap<0.05 compared with CG, bp<0.05 compared with empty stomach, cp<0.05 compared with DM-NIG.
Fig. 4Ratio of ApoA1/ApoB in each group after OGTT are shown. Experimental conditions and treatment procedures are given in Materials and Methods. Data are expressed as mean ± SD. ap<0.05 compared with CG, bp<0.05 compared with empty stomach, cp<0.05 compared with DM-NIG.