| Literature DB >> 27698381 |
Jiaojiao Niu1,2, Jie Deng3, Yunhua Xiao1,2, Zhili He3, Xian Zhang1,2, J D Van Nostrand3, Yili Liang1,2, Ye Deng4, Xueduan Liu1,2, Huaqun Yin1,2.
Abstract
Bioleaching has been employed commercially to recover metals from low grade ores, but the production efficiency remains to be improved due to limited understanding of the system. This study examined the shift of microbial communities and S&Fe cycling in three subsystems within a copper ore bioleaching system: leaching heap (LH), leaching solution (LS) and sediment under LS. Results showed that both LH and LS had higher relative abundance of S and Fe oxidizing bacteria, while S and Fe reducing bacteria were more abundant in the Sediment. GeoChip analysis showed a stronger functional potential for S0 oxidation in LH microbial communities. These findings were consistent with measured oxidation activities to S0 and Fe2+, which were highest by microbial communities from LH, lower by those from LS and lowest form Sediment. Moreover, phylogenetic molecular ecological network analysis indicated that these differences might be related to interactions among microbial taxa. Last but not the least, a conceptual model was proposed, linking the S&Fe cycling with responsible microbial populations in the bioleaching systems. Collectively, this study revealed the microbial community and functional structures in all three subsystems of the copper ore, and advanced a holistic understanding of the whole bioleaching system.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27698381 PMCID: PMC5048113 DOI: 10.1038/srep34744
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Physicochemical properties of each sample.
| Sample | pH | TON | TOC | DO | Fe2+ | Fe3+ | TFe | AVS | CRS | ES | TS | Cu | K | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LH | 3.2 | 263.1 | 1243.2 | 0.73 | 32.1 | 36.8 | 60222 | 32.7 | 11354.2 | 950.7 | 46746 | 1288 | 27112 | 121.3 |
| LS | 2.4 | 54.1 | 11.1 | 1.33 | 98.7 | 362.3 | 500 | 40.3 | 34.4 | 10.1 | 8227 | 171 | 6.32 | 75.4 |
| Sediment | 2.8 | 1137.3 | 8362.4 | 0.39 | 56.97 | 90.7 | 114792 | 63.6 | 2764.9 | 111.9 | 41496 | 710 | 22117 | 189.6 |
All values are in ppm, except for pH.
*LH: leaching heap; LS: leaching solution; TON: total organic nitrogen; TOC: total organic carbon; DO: dissolved oxygen; TFe: total Fe; AVS: acid volatile sulfide; CRS: chromium reducible sulfur; ES: elemental sulfur; TS: total sulfur.
Figure 1Microbial community composition and structure of each subsystem and Venn diagram depicts the shared and distinct OTUs of three environments.
Figure 2(A) Relative abundances of functional bacteria in three groups; (B) Normalized intensity of genes involved in sulfur metabolism. Significant (p < 0.05) differences among groups are indicated by alphabetic letters or *. (*p < 0.1, **p < 0.05).
Figure 3Concept model of biogeochemical Fe&S cycling and microorganisms involved in them in bioleaching system.
Orange arrows represent oxidation reaction and blue arrows indicate reduction reaction. Deeper color indicates more active reaction. For example, there is stronger S oxidation in LH and stronger S reduction in Sediment. Microbial genera name is labeled at the correspondent geochemical process that the population involved.