Literature DB >> 27698088

Interactions between the Cytoplasmic Domains of PspB and PspC Silence the Yersinia enterocolitica Phage Shock Protein Response.

Josué Flores-Kim1, Andrew J Darwin2.   

Abstract

The phage shock protein (Psp) system is a widely conserved cell envelope stress response that is essential for the virulence of some bacteria, including Yersinia enterocolitica Recruitment of PspA by the inner membrane PspB-PspC complex characterizes the activated state of this response. The PspB-PspC complex has been proposed to be a stress-responsive switch, changing from an OFF to an ON state in response to an inducing stimulus. In the OFF state, PspA cannot access its binding site in the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of PspC (PspCCT), because this site is bound to PspB. PspC has another cytoplasmic domain at its N-terminal end (PspCNT), which has been thought to play a role in maintaining the OFF state, because its removal causes constitutive activation. However, until now, this role has proved recalcitrant to experimental investigation. Here, we developed a combination of approaches to investigate the role of PspCNT in Y. enterocolitica Pulldown assays provided evidence that PspCNT mediates the interaction of PspC with the C-terminal cytoplasmic domain of PspB (PspBCT) in vitro Furthermore, site-specific oxidative cross-linking suggested that a PspCNT-PspBCT interaction occurs only under noninducing conditions in vivo Additional experiments indicated that mutations in pspC might cause constitutive activation by compromising this PspCNT binding site or by causing a conformational disturbance that repositions PspCNT in vivo These findings have provided the first insight into the regulatory function of the N-terminal cytoplasmic domain of PspC, revealing that its ability to participate in an inhibitory complex is essential to silencing the Psp response. IMPORTANCE: The phage shock protein (Psp) response has generated widespread interest because it is linked to important phenotypes, including antibiotic resistance, biofilm formation, and virulence in a diverse group of bacteria. Therefore, achieving a comprehensive understanding of how this response is controlled at the molecular level has obvious significance. An integral inner membrane protein complex is believed to be a critical regulatory component that acts as a stress-responsive switch, but some essential characteristics of the switch states are poorly understood. This study provides an important advance by uncovering a new protein interaction domain within this membrane protein complex that is essential to silencing the Psp response in the absence of an inducing stimulus.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27698088      PMCID: PMC5116940          DOI: 10.1128/JB.00655-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bacteriol        ISSN: 0021-9193            Impact factor:   3.490


  38 in total

1.  Bacterial outer membrane secretin PulD assembles and inserts into the inner membrane in the absence of its pilotin.

Authors:  Ingrid Guilvout; Mohamed Chami; Andreas Engel; Anthony P Pugsley; Nicolas Bayan
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 2.  Cell envelope stress response in Gram-positive bacteria.

Authors:  Sina Jordan; Matthew I Hutchings; Thorsten Mascher
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 16.408

3.  The Yersinia enterocolitica phage shock proteins B and C can form homodimers and heterodimers in vivo with the possibility of close association between multiple domains.

Authors:  Erwan Gueguen; Josué Flores-Kim; Andrew J Darwin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2011-08-19       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Improved allelic exchange vectors and their use to analyze 987P fimbria gene expression.

Authors:  R A Edwards; L H Keller; D M Schifferli
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1998-01-30       Impact factor: 3.688

Review 5.  The Phage Shock Protein Response.

Authors:  Josué Flores-Kim; Andrew J Darwin
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-08       Impact factor: 15.500

6.  Increased solubility of trimethoprim-resistant type S1 DHFR from Staphylococcus aureus in Escherichia coli cells overproducing the chaperonins GroEL and GroES.

Authors:  G E Dale; H J Schönfeld; H Langen; M Stieger
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-07

7.  The phage shock protein PspA facilitates divalent metal transport and is required for virulence of Salmonella enterica sv. Typhimurium.

Authors:  Joyce E Karlinsey; Michael E Maguire; Lynne A Becker; Marie-Laure V Crouch; Ferric C Fang
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.501

Review 8.  Managing membrane stress: the phage shock protein (Psp) response, from molecular mechanisms to physiology.

Authors:  Nicolas Joly; Christoph Engl; Goran Jovanovic; Maxime Huvet; Tina Toni; Xia Sheng; Michael P H Stumpf; Martin Buck
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 16.408

9.  Identification of a new member of the phage shock protein response in Escherichia coli, the phage shock protein G (PspG).

Authors:  Louise J Lloyd; Susan E Jones; Goran Jovanovic; Prasad Gyaneshwar; Matthew D Rolfe; Arthur Thompson; Jay C Hinton; Martin Buck
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2004-10-13       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Transcription Regulation and Membrane Stress Management in Enterobacterial Pathogens.

Authors:  Nan Zhang; Goran Jovanovic; Christopher McDonald; Oscar Ces; Xiaodong Zhang; Martin Buck
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.622

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prophage-Related Gene VpaChn25_0724 Contributes to Cell Membrane Integrity and Growth of Vibrio parahaemolyticus CHN25.

Authors:  Lianzhi Yang; Yaping Wang; Pan Yu; Shunlin Ren; Zhuoying Zhu; Yinzhe Jin; Jizhou Yan; Xu Peng; Lanming Chen
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.293

2.  Psp Stress Response Proteins Form a Complex with Mislocalized Secretins in the Yersinia enterocolitica Cytoplasmic Membrane.

Authors:  Disha Srivastava; Amal Moumene; Josué Flores-Kim; Andrew J Darwin
Journal:  mBio       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 7.867

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.