Literature DB >> 27698073

Disclosure of donor conception in the era of non-anonymity: safeguarding and promoting the interests of donor-conceived individuals?

Sophie Zadeh1.   

Abstract

This article responds to a debate article published in Human Reproduction earlier this year. In that article, the authors suggested that parents should be encouraged to disclose the use of donor gametes to their children given rapid and widespread advances in genetic testing and sequencing. However, there is an urgent need to engage with the assertion that in this context, telling children about their donor conception both safeguards and promotes their interests, particularly if such disclosure is motivated by parents' anxieties about accidental discovery. Disclosure that is motivated by the notion of non-anonymity may also encourage parents to share misinformation about donors and encourage their children to have unrealistic expectations. Fertility professionals must remain mindful of these outcomes when discussing disclosure and the future implications of increasing access to genetic information with both prospective and current parents. It is strongly advised that future discussions about the end of donor anonymity are not conflated with the debate on disclosure.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anonymity; disclosure; donor conception; gamete donation; identifiability

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27698073     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dew240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  10 in total

1.  Exploring Infertile Couples' Decisions to Disclose Donor Conception to The Future Child.

Authors:  Fatemeh Hadizadeh-Talasaz; Masoumeh Simbar; Robab Latifnejad Roudsari
Journal:  Int J Fertil Steril       Date:  2020-10-12

2.  Children's thoughts and feelings about their donor and security of attachment to their solo mothers in middle childhood.

Authors:  S Zadeh; C M Jones; T Basi; S Golombok
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2017-04-01       Impact factor: 6.918

3.  Recent developments in genetics and medically-assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications†‡.

Authors:  J C Harper; K Aittomäki; P Borry; M C Cornel; G de Wert; W Dondorp; J Geraedts; L Gianaroli; K Ketterson; I Liebaers; K Lundin; H Mertes; M Morris; G Pennings; K Sermon; C Spits; S Soini; A P A van Montfoort; A Veiga; J R Vermeesch; S Viville; M Macek
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2017-12-04

4.  Understanding parents' intention to disclose the donor conception to their child by application of the theory of planned behaviour.

Authors:  Claudia Lampic; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Kimmo Sorjonen; Gunilla Sydsjö
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 5.  Psychosocial aspects of identity-release gamete donation - perspectives of donors, recipients, and offspring.

Authors:  Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Gunilla Sydsjö; Claudia Lampic
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 2.384

6.  Good practice recommendations for information provision for those involved in reproductive donation.

Authors:  Jackson Kirkman-Brown; Carlos Calhaz-Jorge; Eline A F Dancet; Kersti Lundin; Mariana Martins; Kelly Tilleman; Petra Thorn; Nathalie Vermeulen; Lucy Frith
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2022-02-16

Review 7.  Shifting to a model of donor conception that entails a communication agreement among the parents, donor, and offspring.

Authors:  Tetsuya Ishii; Iñigo de Miguel Beriain
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-03-04       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 8.  Recent developments in genetics and medically assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications.

Authors:  J C Harper; K Aittomäki; P Borry; M C Cornel; G de Wert; W Dondorp; J Geraedts; L Gianaroli; K Ketterson; I Liebaers; K Lundin; H Mertes; M Morris; G Pennings; K Sermon; C Spits; S Soini; A P A van Montfoort; A Veiga; J R Vermeesch; S Viville; M Macek
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2017-12-04       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Sperm donor regulation and disclosure intentions: Results from a nationwide multi-centre study in France.

Authors:  N Kalampalikis; M Doumergue; S Zadeh
Journal:  Reprod Biomed Soc Online       Date:  2018-03-10

10.  Positioning the donor in a new landscape-mothers' and fathers' experiences as their adult children obtained information about the identity-release sperm donor.

Authors:  Andreas Widbom; Stina Isaksson; Gunilla Sydsjö; Agneta Skoog Svanberg; Claudia Lampic
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2021-07-19       Impact factor: 6.918

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.