Literature DB >> 2769773

Why do so many people drop out from auto-injection therapy for impotence?

S E Althof1, L A Turner, S B Levine, C Risen, E Kursh, D Bodner, M Resnick.   

Abstract

Although intracavernous injection of vasoactive substances has been shown to be a reasonable and reliable method of reversing impotence, studies assessing patient acceptance of this new technology are lacking. By prospectively following patients and willing partners over a 2-year period, this study sought to document patient utilization rates and the reasons why patients decline or discontinue injection therapy. The cumulative dropout rate was 46%, with patients being most at risk for leaving the program after evaluation or during the trial dose phase. Patients decline treatment because they are unable to accept the idea of injecting themselves or because of potential side effects. Patients discontinue treatment because of perceived lack of efficacy. Patient and programatic obstacles to utilization of self-injection therapy are analyzed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2769773     DOI: 10.1080/00926238908403816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Marital Ther        ISSN: 0092-623X


  13 in total

1.  Sexual medicine: Why stop a good thing? Discontinuing PDE5 inhibitors.

Authors:  Helen M Conaglen; John V Conaglen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-08-14       Impact factor: 14.432

2.  Papaverine plus prostaglandin E1 versus prostaglandin E1 alone for intracorporeal injection therapy.

Authors:  T F Zaher
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 3.  Intracavernous pharmacotherapy.

Authors:  M C Truss; A J Becker; D Schultheiss; U Jonas
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Cost utility analysis of sildenafil compared with papaverine-phentolamine injections.

Authors:  E A Stolk; J J Busschbach; M Caffa; E J Meuleman; F F Rutten
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-04-29

5.  Health-related quality of life in men with erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  M S Litwin; R J Nied; N Dhanani
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Men's experience with penile rehabilitation following radical prostatectomy: a qualitative study with the goal of informing a therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Christian J Nelson; Stephanie Lacey; Joslyn Kenowitz; Hayley Pessin; Elyse Shuk; Andrew J Roth; John P Mulhall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 3.894

7.  Delivery of intracavernosal therapies using needle-free injection devices.

Authors:  D O'Kane; L Gibson; J du Plessis; A Davidson; D Bolton; N Lawrentschuk
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-07-27       Impact factor: 2.896

8.  Acceptance and Commitment Therapy to Increase Adherence to Penile Injection Therapy-Based Rehabilitation After Radical Prostatectomy: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Christian J Nelson; Rebecca M Saracino; Stephanie Napolitano; Hayley Pessin; Joseph B Narus; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.802

Review 9.  Erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Faysal A Yafi; Lawrence Jenkins; Maarten Albersen; Giovanni Corona; Andrea M Isidori; Shari Goldfarb; Mario Maggi; Christian J Nelson; Sharon Parish; Andrea Salonia; Ronny Tan; John P Mulhall; Wayne J G Hellstrom
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-02-04       Impact factor: 52.329

10.  Long-term satisfaction and predictors of use of intracorporeal injections for post-prostatectomy erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Vinay Prabhu; Joseph P Alukal; Juliana Laze; Danil V Makarov; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-20       Impact factor: 7.450

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.