Literature DB >> 27697719

Medial-lateral centre of mass displacement and base of support are equally good predictors of metabolic cost in amputee walking.

R A Weinert-Aplin1, M Twiste2, H L Jarvis3, A N Bennett4, R J Baker5.   

Abstract

Amputees are known to walk with greater metabolic cost than able-bodied individuals and establishing predictors of metabolic cost from kinematic measures, such as centre of mass (CoM) motion, during walking are important from a rehabilitative perspective, as they can provide quantifiable measures to target during gait rehabilitation in amputees. While it is known that vertical CoM motion poorly predicts metabolic cost, CoM motion in the medial-lateral (ML) and anterior-posterior directions have not been investigated in the context of gait efficiency in the amputee population. Therefore, the aims of this study were to investigate the relationship between CoM motion in all three directions of motion, base of support and walking speed, and the metabolic cost of walking in both able-bodied individuals and different levels of lower limb amputee. 37 individuals were recruited to form groups of controls, unilateral above- and below-knee, and bilateral above-knee amputees respectively. Full-body optical motion and oxygen consumption data were collected during walking at a self-selected speed. CoM position was taken as the mass-weighted average of all body segments and compared to each individual's net non-dimensional metabolic cost. Base of support and ML CoM displacement were the strongest correlates to metabolic cost and the positive correlations suggest increased ML CoM displacement or Base of support will reduce walking efficiency. Rehabilitation protocols which indirectly reduce these indicators, rather than vertical CoM displacement will likely show improvements in amputee walking efficiency. Copyright Â
© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Efficiency; Gait; Prosthetic; Rehabilitation

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27697719     DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gait Posture        ISSN: 0966-6362            Impact factor:   2.840


  6 in total

1.  Trunk muscle activity patterns and motion patterns of patients with motor complete spinal cord injury at T8 and T10 walking with different un-powered exoskeletons.

Authors:  Xinyu Guan; Shengzheng Kuai; Linhong Ji; Rencheng Wang; Run Ji
Journal:  J Spinal Cord Med       Date:  2017-05-17       Impact factor: 1.985

2.  Finite element simulation of frontal plane adaptation using full-foot, split-toe and cam-linkage designs in prosthetic feet.

Authors:  Murray E Maitland; Katheryn J Allyn; Evandro M Ficanha; James M Colvin; Matthew M Wernke
Journal:  J Prosthet Orthot       Date:  2022-01

3.  Metabolic costs of activities of daily living in persons with a lower limb amputation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Loeke van Schaik; Jan H B Geertzen; Pieter U Dijkstra; Rienk Dekker
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Mobility assessment in people with Alzheimer disease using smartphone sensors.

Authors:  Pilar Serra-Añó; José Francisco Pedrero-Sánchez; Juan Hurtado-Abellán; Marta Inglés; Gemma Victoria Espí-López; Juan López-Pascual
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-08-14       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Use of the margin of stability to quantify stability in pathologic gait - a qualitative systematic review.

Authors:  Fraje Watson; Peter C Fino; Matthew Thornton; Constantinos Heracleous; Rui Loureiro; Julian J H Leong
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Effects of extended stance time on a powered knee prosthesis and gait symmetry on the lateral control of balance during walking in individuals with unilateral amputation.

Authors:  Andrea Brandt; He Helen Huang
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-11-29       Impact factor: 4.262

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.