Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou1, Ramaswamy Govindan2, Keith D Eaton3, Gregory A Otterson4, Martin E Gutierrez5, Alain C Mita6, Athanassios Argiris6, Nicoletta M Brega7, Tiziana Usari7, Weiwei Tan8, Steffan N Ho8, Francisco Robert9. 1. Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California at Irvine Medical Center, Orange, California. Electronic address: siou@uci.edu. 2. Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri. 3. Seattle Cancer Care Alliance and the University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. 4. Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center and the James Cancer Hospital, Columbus, Ohio. 5. John Theurer Cancer Center, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey. 6. Cancer Therapy and Research Center, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas. 7. Pfizer Oncology, Milan, Italy. 8. Pfizer Oncology, San Diego, California. 9. Birmingham Veterans Administration Hospital, Birmingham, Alabama; University of Alabama-Birmingham Comprehensive Cancer Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: This phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose, and efficacy of crizotinib plus erlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 after failure of one or two prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. Erlotinib, 100 mg, was given continuously once daily starting between day -14 and -7; crizotinib, 200 mg twice daily (dose level 1) or 150 mg twice daily (dose level -1), was added continuously beginning on day 1 of treatment cycle 1. Potential pharmacokinetic interactions between crizotinib and erlotinib were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients received treatment; 26 received crizotinib plus erlotinib. Frequent adverse events were diarrhea, rash, decreased appetite, and fatigue. Dose-limiting toxicities were dehydration, diarrhea, dry eye, dysphagia, dyspepsia, esophagitis and vomiting. The MTD was crizotinib, 150 mg twice daily, with erlotinib, 100 mg once daily. Crizotinib increased the erlotinib area under the concentration-time curve 1.5-fold (dose level -1) and 1.8-fold (dose level 1). The plasma level of crizotinib appeared to be unaffected by coadministration of erlotinib. Two patients whose tumors harbored activating EGFR mutations achieved confirmed partial responses, one at each crizotinib dose level. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of the combination of crizotinib and erlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC was crizotinib, 150 mg twice daily, with erlotinib, 100 mg once daily, which is less than the approved dose of either agent. The phase II portion of the study was not initiated.
INTRODUCTION: This phase I trial was conducted to determine the safety, maximum tolerated dose (MTD)/recommended phase II dose, and efficacy of crizotinib plus erlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC. METHODS:Patients with NSCLC and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 after failure of one or two prior chemotherapy regimens were eligible. Erlotinib, 100 mg, was given continuously once daily starting between day -14 and -7; crizotinib, 200 mg twice daily (dose level 1) or 150 mg twice daily (dose level -1), was added continuously beginning on day 1 of treatment cycle 1. Potential pharmacokinetic interactions between crizotinib and erlotinib were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients received treatment; 26 received crizotinib plus erlotinib. Frequent adverse events were diarrhea, rash, decreased appetite, and fatigue. Dose-limiting toxicities were dehydration, diarrhea, dry eye, dysphagia, dyspepsia, esophagitis and vomiting. The MTD was crizotinib, 150 mg twice daily, with erlotinib, 100 mg once daily. Crizotinib increased the erlotinib area under the concentration-time curve 1.5-fold (dose level -1) and 1.8-fold (dose level 1). The plasma level of crizotinib appeared to be unaffected by coadministration of erlotinib. Two patients whose tumors harbored activating EGFR mutations achieved confirmed partial responses, one at each crizotinib dose level. CONCLUSIONS: The MTD of the combination of crizotinib and erlotinib in patients with advanced NSCLC was crizotinib, 150 mg twice daily, with erlotinib, 100 mg once daily, which is less than the approved dose of either agent. The phase II portion of the study was not initiated.
Authors: Eunice L Kwak; Yung-Jue Bang; D Ross Camidge; Alice T Shaw; Benjamin Solomon; Robert G Maki; Sai-Hong I Ou; Bruce J Dezube; Pasi A Jänne; Daniel B Costa; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Woo-Ho Kim; Thomas J Lynch; Panos Fidias; Hannah Stubbs; Jeffrey A Engelman; Lecia V Sequist; WeiWei Tan; Leena Gandhi; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Greg C Wei; S Martin Shreeve; Mark J Ratain; Jeffrey Settleman; James G Christensen; Daniel A Haber; Keith Wilner; Ravi Salgia; Geoffrey I Shapiro; Jeffrey W Clark; A John Iafrate Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-10-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Shinji Yamazaki; Paolo Vicini; Zhongzhou Shen; Helen Y Zou; Joseph Lee; Qiuhua Li; James G Christensen; Bill J Smith; Bhasker Shetty Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2011-11-30 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Eunice L Kwak; Christina Siwak-Tapp; Joni Dy; Kristin Bergethon; Jeffrey W Clark; D Ross Camidge; Benjamin J Solomon; Robert G Maki; Yung-Jue Bang; Dong-Wan Kim; James Christensen; Weiwei Tan; Keith D Wilner; Ravi Salgia; A John Iafrate Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2011-05 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Lecia V Sequist; Belinda A Waltman; Dora Dias-Santagata; Subba Digumarthy; Alexa B Turke; Panos Fidias; Kristin Bergethon; Alice T Shaw; Scott Gettinger; Arjola K Cosper; Sara Akhavanfard; Rebecca S Heist; Jennifer Temel; James G Christensen; John C Wain; Thomas J Lynch; Kathy Vernovsky; Eugene J Mark; Michael Lanuti; A John Iafrate; Mari Mino-Kenudson; Jeffrey A Engelman Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Ashok Rakhit; Michael P Pantze; Scott Fettner; Hannah M Jones; Jean-Eric Charoin; Myriam Riek; Bert L Lum; Marta Hamilton Journal: Eur J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2007-11-14 Impact factor: 2.953
Authors: Aria Vaishnavi; Laura Schubert; Uwe Rix; Lindsay A Marek; Anh T Le; Stephen B Keysar; Magdalena J Glogowska; Matthew A Smith; Severine Kako; Natalia J Sumi; Kurtis D Davies; Kathryn E Ware; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Eric B Haura; Antonio Jimeno; Lynn E Heasley; Dara L Aisner; Robert C Doebele Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-20 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Caroline E McCoach; Collin M Blakely; Kimberly C Banks; Benjamin Levy; Ben M Chue; Victoria M Raymond; Anh T Le; Christine E Lee; Joseph Diaz; Saiama N Waqar; William T Purcell; Dara L Aisner; Kurtis D Davies; Richard B Lanman; Alice T Shaw; Robert C Doebele Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-03-29 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Emily Greengard; Yael P Mosse; Xiaowei Liu; Charles G Minard; Joel M Reid; Stephan Voss; Keith Wilner; Elizabeth Fox; Frank Balis; Susan M Blaney; Peter C Adamson; Brenda J Weigel Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: W Brian Dalton; Patrick M Forde; Hyunseok Kang; Roisin M Connolly; Vered Stearns; Christopher D Gocke; James R Eshleman; Jennifer Axilbund; Dana Petry; Cindy Geoghegan; Antonio C Wolff; David M Loeb; Christine A Pratilas; Christian F Meyer; Eric S Christenson; Shannon A Slater; Jennifer Ensminger; Heather A Parsons; Ben H Park; Josh Lauring Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2017-05-31
Authors: Mary B Kelley; Taylor J Geddes; Maria Ochiai; Noah M Lampl; W Wade Kothmann; Sara R Fierstein; Victoria Kent; Kathleen DeCicco-Skinner Journal: PLoS One Date: 2022-03-24 Impact factor: 3.240