Role of substrate binding forces in exchange-only transport systems: I. Transition-state theory.

An analysis of transition-state models for exchange-only transport shows that substrate binding forces, carrier conformational changes, and coupled substrate flow are interrelated. For a system to catalyze exchange but not net transport, addition of the substrate must convert the carrier from an immobile to a mobile form. The reduction in the energy barrier to movement is necessarily paid for out of the intrinsic binding energy between the substrate and the transport site, and is dependent on the formation of two different types of complex: a loose complex initially and a tight complex in the transition state in carrier movement. Hence the site should at first be incompletely organized for optimal binding but, following a conformational change, complementary to the substrate structure in the transition state. The conformational change, which may involve the whole protein, would be induced by cooperative interactions between the substrate and several groups within the site, involving a chelate effect. The tightness of coupling, i.e., the ratio of exchange to net transport, is directly proportional to the increased binding energy in the transition state, a relationship which allows the virtual substrate dissociation constant in the transition state to be calculated from experimental rate and half-saturation constants. Because the transition state is present in minute amount, strong bonding here does not enhance the substrate's affinity, and specificity may, therefore, be expressed in maximum exchange rates alone. However, where substrates largely convert the carrier to a transport intermediate whose mobility is the same with all substrates, specificity is also expressed in affinity. Hence the expression of substrate specificity provides evidence on the translocation mechanism.