Literature DB >> 27696344

Velamentous or marginal cord insertion and the risk of spontaneous preterm birth, prelabor rupture of the membranes, and anomalous cord length, a population-based study.

Cathrine Ebbing1, Synnøve L Johnsen1, Susanne Albrechtsen1,2, Ingvild D Sunde2, Christina Vekseth2, Svein Rasmussen1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Anomalous cord insertion is associated with increased risk of adverse maternal and perinatal outcome. Our aim was to study whether anomalous cord insertion is associated with prelabor rupture of membranes (PROM), preterm PROM (pPROM), long or short umbilical cord, and time trend of spontaneous preterm birth (SPTB) and anomalous cord insertion.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A population-based register study using data from the Medical Birth Register of Norway including all singleton births (gestational age >16 weeks and <45 weeks) during 1999-2013 (n = 860 465) to calculate odds ratios (ORs) for PROM, pPROM, SPTB, and cord length (>95th or <5th centile) according to the cord insertion site by logistic regression with adjustment for possible confounders. We also assessed time trends of SPTB and anomalous cord insertion.
RESULTS: Velamentous insertion of the cord was associated with an increased risk of PROM (OR 1.6, 95% CI 1.5-1.7), pPROM (OR 2.7, 95% CI 2.4-3.0), SPTB (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.9-2.2), and a short cord (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.5-1.8). Marginal insertion was to a lesser extent associated with these complications. Occurrences of SPTB and anomalous insertion declined. The decline in SPTB persisted after including an interaction term between anomalous insertion and time.
CONCLUSIONS: Velamentous and, to a lesser extent, marginal cord insertions were associated with increased risk of PROM, pPROM, SPTB, and short cord. This suggests a common pathogenesis behind altered function of the membranes, cord, and placenta. The decline in SPTB could not be explained by the reduction in the occurrence of anomalous cord insertion.
© 2016 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Keywords:  Delivery; high-risk pregnancy; placenta; pregnancy; preterm birth; rupture of membranes

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27696344     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  7 in total

1.  New Frontiers in Placenta Tissue Imaging.

Authors:  Christopher D Nguyen; Ana Correia-Branco; Nimish Adhikari; Ezgi Mercan; Srivalleesha Mallidi; Mary C Wallingford
Journal:  EMJ Radiol       Date:  2020-09

Review 2.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of velamentous cord insertion among singleton pregnancies and the risk of preterm delivery.

Authors:  Samantha de Los Reyes; Janice Henderson; Ahizechukwu C Eke
Journal:  Int J Gynaecol Obstet       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 4.447

3.  Early detection of velamentous cord insertion at the eighth week of gestation.

Authors:  Caiyun Liao; Irene Peregrin-Alvarez; Robert Roman; Joshua Morris; Laura Detti
Journal:  Clin Case Rep       Date:  2020-04-20

Review 4.  Velamentous cord insertion: results from a rapid review of incidence, risk factors, adverse outcomes and screening.

Authors:  Amy Buchanan-Hughes; Anna Bobrowska; Cristina Visintin; George Attilakos; John Marshall
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-06-23

5.  Accuracy of fetal anatomy survey in the diagnosis of velamentous cord insertion: a case-control study.

Authors:  William M Curtin; Jennifer M Hill; Karmaine A Millington; Odessa P Hamidi; Stephen S Rasiah; Serdar H Ural
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2019-03-11

Review 6.  Assisted Reproductive Technique and Abnormal Cord Insertion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Shinya Matsuzaki; Yutaka Ueda; Satoko Matsuzaki; Yoshikazu Nagase; Mamoru Kakuda; Misooja Lee; Michihide Maeda; Hiroki Kurahashi; Harue Hayashida; Tsuyoshi Hisa; Seiji Mabuchi; Shoji Kamiura
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-07-17

7.  Extreme umbilical cord lengths, cord knot and entanglement: Risk factors and risk of adverse outcomes, a population-based study.

Authors:  Lorentz Erland Linde; Svein Rasmussen; Jörg Kessler; Cathrine Ebbing
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.