Literature DB >> 27696099

Utilization of osteoporosis medication after a fragility fracture among elderly Medicare beneficiaries.

Akeem A Yusuf1,2, Thomas J Matlon3, Andreas Grauer4, Richard Barron4, David Chandler4, Yi Peng3.   

Abstract

Osteoporosis medications are recommended for elderly patients after a fragility fracture. However, we found substantial under-treatment in the post-fracture year, especially among patients who had not previously received such medications. Improved treatment of elderly patients experiencing fragility fractures is needed.
INTRODUCTION: Osteoporosis medications are recommended for elderly patients after a fragility fracture, but under-treatment is common. We determined osteoporosis medication use after fragility fractures and examined associated factors.
METHODS: Our cohort included elderly (age ≥66 years) Medicare-enrolled patients who sustained fragility fractures January 1, 2008-December 31, 2011. Osteoporosis medication prescriptions were determined in the 12 months after the index fracture. Using multivariate logistic models, we examined the association between post-fracture osteoporosis medication use and predictors.
RESULTS: Of 145,185 patients with fragility fractures (mean age 80.9 ± 7.8 years; 91.2 % white; 81.3 % female), 29.9 % sustained hip, 31.8 % vertebral, and 38.4 % non-hip-non-vertebral fractures. Overall, 30.4 % of the cohort received an osteoporosis medication in the 12-month post-fracture period. Of patients not receiving an osteoporosis medication in the pre-index period (n = 108,344), 14.9 % of all patients, 16.3 % of women, and 10.3 % of men received one in the post-fracture period. Corresponding values for patients receiving an osteoporosis medication in the pre-index period (n = 36,841) were 76.2, 76.5, and 72.2 %. Odds of post-fracture osteoporosis medication use were 68 % higher for women than for men. Osteoporosis diagnosis (odds ratio, 1.55; P < 0.0001) and bone-mineral-density tests before an index fracture (odds ratio, 1.24; P < 0.001) were associated with post-fracture osteoporosis medication use.
CONCLUSIONS: Less than one third of our cohort received an osteoporosis medication in the post-fracture year, when risk of a second fragility fracture is highest. In those not already previously treated with an osteoporosis medication, only about 1 in 7 patients received treatment.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fragility fracture; Medicare; Osteoporosis; Osteoporosis medication

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27696099     DOI: 10.1007/s11657-016-0285-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Osteoporos            Impact factor:   2.617


  13 in total

1.  Use of antiosteoporotic drugs and calcium/vitamin D in patients with fragility fractures: impact on re-fracture and mortality risk.

Authors:  Luca Degli Esposti; Anna Girardi; Stefania Saragoni; Stefania Sella; Margherita Andretta; Maurizio Rossini; Sandro Giannini
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Comparison of Teriparatide and Denosumab in Patients Switching From Long-Term Bisphosphonate Use.

Authors:  Houchen Lyu; Sizheng S Zhao; Kazuki Yoshida; Sara K Tedeschi; Chang Xu; Sagar U Nigwekar; Benjamin Z Leder; Daniel H Solomon
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Economic impact and cost-effectiveness of fracture liaison services: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  C-H Wu; I-J Kao; W-C Hung; S-C Lin; H-C Liu; M-H Hsieh; S Bagga; M Achra; T-T Cheng; R-S Yang
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-02-19       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Higher rates of osteoporosis treatment initiation and persistence in patients with newly diagnosed vertebral fracture when introduced in inpatients than later in outpatients.

Authors:  H Spechbach; I Fabreguet; E Saule; M Hars; J Stirnemann; S Ferrari; R Rizzoli; T Chevalley
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Medical management patterns in a US commercial claims database following a nontraumatic fracture in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Xiaoqing Xu; Mary Oates; Timothy Hill; Rolin L Wade
Journal:  Arch Osteoporos       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 2.879

6.  Protocol for the models of primary osteoporosis screening in men (MOPS) cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Cathleen S Colón-Emeric; Richard Lee; Carl F Pieper; Kenneth W Lyles; Leah L Zullig; Richard E Nelson; Katina Robinson; Ivuoma Igwe; Jyotsna Jadhav; Robert A Adler
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 2.261

Review 7.  Quality Measures and Quality Improvement Initiatives in Osteoporosis-an Update.

Authors:  S French; S Choden; Gabriela Schmajuk
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 5.096

8.  Perspectives on the non-invasive evaluation of femoral strength in the assessment of hip fracture risk.

Authors:  M L Bouxsein; P Zysset; C C Glüer; M McClung; E Biver; D D Pierroz; S L Ferrari
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2020-01-03       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Impact of Bone Mineral Density on the Incidence of Age-Related Vertebral Fragility Fracture.

Authors:  Jeongik Lee; Geunwu Chang; Hyun Kang; Dae Woong Ham; Jae Sung Lee; Hyoung Seok Jung; Kwang Sup Song
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2020-05-04       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Healthcare Policy Changes in Osteoporosis Can Improve Outcomes and Reduce Costs in the United States.

Authors:  E Michael Lewiecki; Jesse D Ortendahl; Jacqueline Vanderpuye-Orgle; Andreas Grauer; Jorge Arellano; Jeffrey Lemay; Amanda L Harmon; Michael S Broder; Andrea J Singer
Journal:  JBMR Plus       Date:  2019-05-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.