Literature DB >> 27695760

Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Cattle Excreta on an East African Grassland.

D E Pelster, B Gisore, J Goopy, D Korir, J K Koske, M C Rufino, K Butterbach-Bahl.   

Abstract

Greenhouse gas (GHG) emission measurements from livestock excreta in Africa are limited. We measured CH and NO emissions from excreta of six Boran () and six Friesian () steers near Nairobi, Kenya. The steers were fed one of three diets (T1 [chaffed wheat straw], T2 [T1 + Meissner - 0.2% live weight per day], and T3 [T1 + calliandra - 0.4% live weight every 2 d]). The T1 diet is similar in quality to typical diets in the region. Calliandra is a leguminous fodder tree promoted as a feed supplement. Fresh feces and urine were applied to grasslands and emissions measured using static chambers. Cumulative 28-d fecal emissions were 302 ± 52.4 and 95 ± 13.8 mg CH-C kg dry matter for Friesen and Boran steers, respectively, and 11.5 ± 4.26 and 24.7 ± 8.32 mg NO-N kg dry matter for Friesian and Boran steers, respectively. For urine from Friesian steers, the NO emissions were 2.8 ± 0.64 mg NO-N 100 mL urine. The CH emission factors (EFs) (246 ± 49.5 and 87 ± 12.7 g CH-C yr animal for Friesan and Boran, respectively) were lower than the International Panel on Climate Change EFs (750 g CH-C animal yr), whereas the NO EFs (0.1 and 0.2% for the Friesian and Boran feces, respectively, and 1.2% for urine) were also lower than International Panel on Climate Change estimates. The low N content of the excreta likely caused the low emissions and indicates that current models probably overestimate CH and NO emissions from African livestock manure.
Copyright © by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27695760     DOI: 10.2134/jeq2016.02.0050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Environ Qual        ISSN: 0047-2425            Impact factor:   2.751


  5 in total

1.  Are distinct nitrous oxide emission factors required for cattle urine and dung deposited on pasture in western Canada?

Authors:  Ben W Thomas; Xinlei Gao; Ryan Beck; Xiying Hao
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Adequate vegetative cover decreases nitrous oxide emissions from cattle urine deposited in grazed pastures under rainy season conditions.

Authors:  Ngonidzashe Chirinda; Sandra Loaiza; Laura Arenas; Verónica Ruiz; Claudia Faverín; Carolina Alvarez; Jean Víctor Savian; Renaldo Belfon; Karen Zuniga; Luis Alberto Morales-Rincon; Catalina Trujillo; Miguel Arango; Idupulapati Rao; Jacobo Arango; Michael Peters; Rolando Barahona; Ciniro Costa; Todd S Rosenstock; Meryl Richards; Deissy Martinez-Baron; Laura Cardenas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 4.379

3.  Feeding efficiency gains can increase the greenhouse gas mitigation potential of the Tanzanian dairy sector.

Authors:  James Hawkins; Gabriel Yesuf; Mink Zijlstra; George C Schoneveld; Mariana C Rufino
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Greenhouse gas emissions from cattle dung depositions in two Urochloa forage fields with contrasting biological nitrification inhibition (BNI) capacity.

Authors:  Banira Lombardi; Sandra Loaiza; Catalina Trujillo; Ashly Arevalo; Eduardo Vázquez; Jacobo Arango; Ngonidzashe Chirinda
Journal:  Geoderma       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 6.114

5.  Emerging reporting and verification needs under the Paris Agreement: How can the research community effectively contribute?

Authors:  Lucia Perugini; Guido Pellis; Giacomo Grassi; Philippe Ciais; Han Dolman; Joanna I House; Glen P Peters; Pete Smith; Dirk Günther; Philippe Peylin
Journal:  Environ Sci Policy       Date:  2021-08       Impact factor: 5.581

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.