V Kuznetsov1, K Bissell2. 1. Institute of Mental Medicine, Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, Russia ; International School of Public Health, Northern State Medical University, Arkhangelsk, Russia ; University Hospital of Umeå, Umeå, Sweden. 2. International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease, Paris, France ; School of Population Health, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
Abstract
Setting: Many tuberculosis services are implementing new diagnostics to accelerate treatment initiation for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Successful implementation and uptake are likely to depend on many factors. Objective: To describe the perceptions of the Arkhangelsk health services staff in Northern Russia on the process of introducing the line-probe assay and to determine what facilitates the process of uptake into practice. Design: Process evaluation; semi-structured, in-depth interviews with key informants from civil and penitentiary health services; content analysis. Results: A good working relationship between the civil and penitentiary sectors and a tradition of positive collaboration between doctors and managers were integral to success. Uptake and adaptation were facilitated by regular discussions between managers and implementers, flexibility in adapting routines and an iterative approach to improving procedures. It is beneficial to allow all types of health care workers affected by the diagnostic to learn about it and contribute to its integration. A multidisciplinary evaluation can detect problems elsewhere in the care pathway. Bringing about change in workplace mind-sets and attitudes takes time and management. Conclusion: People take time to observe the effects of innovations, assess relative advantages and become convinced, sometimes by different types of evidence. Multi-disciplinary opportunities for learning, reflecting on care pathways and adaptation should all be a part of introducing new diagnostics.
Setting: Many tuberculosis services are implementing new diagnostics to accelerate treatment initiation for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Successful implementation and uptake are likely to depend on many factors. Objective: To describe the perceptions of the Arkhangelsk health services staff in Northern Russia on the process of introducing the line-probe assay and to determine what facilitates the process of uptake into practice. Design: Process evaluation; semi-structured, in-depth interviews with key informants from civil and penitentiary health services; content analysis. Results: A good working relationship between the civil and penitentiary sectors and a tradition of positive collaboration between doctors and managers were integral to success. Uptake and adaptation were facilitated by regular discussions between managers and implementers, flexibility in adapting routines and an iterative approach to improving procedures. It is beneficial to allow all types of health care workers affected by the diagnostic to learn about it and contribute to its integration. A multidisciplinary evaluation can detect problems elsewhere in the care pathway. Bringing about change in workplace mind-sets and attitudes takes time and management. Conclusion:People take time to observe the effects of innovations, assess relative advantages and become convinced, sometimes by different types of evidence. Multi-disciplinary opportunities for learning, reflecting on care pathways and adaptation should all be a part of introducing new diagnostics.
Authors: R J Coker; B Dimitrova; F Drobniewski; Y Samyshkin; Y Balabanova; S Kuznetsov; I Fedorin; A Melentsiev; G Marchenko; S Zakharova; R Atun Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: G Mann; S B Squire; K Bissell; P Eliseev; E Du Toit; A Hesseling; M Nicol; A Detjen; A Kritski Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2010-12 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Florian M Marx; Rifat A Atun; Wieslaw Jakubowiak; Martin McKee; Richard J Coker Journal: Eur J Public Health Date: 2006-07-12 Impact factor: 3.367
Authors: Elena Tkatchenko-Schmidt; Rifat Atun; Martin Wall; Patrick Tobi; Jürgen Schmidt; Adrian Renton Journal: Health Policy Plan Date: 2010-02-08 Impact factor: 3.344
Authors: E N Bogdanova; A O Mariandyshev; G A Balantcev; P I Eliseev; E I Nikishova; A I Gaida; D Enarson; A Detjen; R Dacombe; P P J Phillips; S B Squire; E Gospodarevskaya Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 3.240