Literature DB >> 27695582

Urothelial-based reconstructive surgery for upper- and mid-ureteral defects: Long-term results.

Barak Rosenzweig1, Yoram Mor1, Tomer Erlich1, Menachem Laufer1, Harry Winkler1, Issac Kaver1, Jacob Ramon1, Zohar A Dotan1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Ureteral strictures can result in obstructive nephropathy and renal function deterioration. Surgical management of ureteral defects, especially in the proximal- and mid-ureter, is particularly challenging. Our purpose was to analyze the long-term outcomes of urothelial-based reconstructive surgery for upper- and mid-ureteral defects.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of a single tertiary centre's database, including 149 patients treated for ureteral defects between 2001 and 2011. Thirty-one patients (21%) underwent complex urothelial-based surgical repairs for upper- and mid-ureter defects. Patients' median age was 61 years. The mean length of the ureteral strictures was 2.5 cm, located in upper-, mid-ureter, or in between in 19 (61%), 10 (32%), and two (6%) patients, respectively. All patients were treated with a primary urothelial-based repair. Median followup time was 26 months. The primary outcome of the study was the long-term preservation of renal function and lack of clinical obstruction. The secondary endpoint of the study was the assessment of the intra- and postoperative complication rates.
RESULTS: Most of the lesions were benign (22, 71%), while nine strictures (29%) were malignant. Seven patients (23%) suffered from postoperative complications, five of which were infectious. The median pre- and postoperative calculated glomerular filtration rates were 66 ml/min/1.72m2 and 64ml/min/1.72m2, respectively. Success rate was 84%, defined as lack of need for re-operation or kidney drainage at the last followup.
CONCLUSIONS: Upper- and mid-ureteral defects present a complex pathology necessitating experienced reconstructive surgical skills. Our data suggest good long-term results for primary urothelial-based reconstructions for these pathologies.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 27695582      PMCID: PMC5028212          DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.3659

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  22 in total

1.  A case against incorporation of bowel segments into the closed urinary system.

Authors:  E A Tanagho
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1975-06       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Ureteral substitution with reconfigured colon: long-term followup.

Authors:  D A Lazica; B Ubrig; A S Brandt; F C von Rundstedt; S Roth
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Buccal mucosa graft for ureteral stricture substitution: initial experience.

Authors:  Abdelbasset A Badawy; Ahmad Abolyosr; Mohamed D Saleem; Abdelmoneim M Abuzeid
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.649

4.  Robotic management of benign mid and distal ureteral strictures and comparison with laparoscopic approaches at a single institution.

Authors:  Kevin Baldie; Jordan Angell; Kenneth Ogan; Nedra Hood; John G Pattaras
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  Oncologic outcomes for complete robot-assisted laparoscopic management of upper-tract transitional cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Jonathan A Eandi; Rebecca A Nelson; Timothy G Wilson; David Y Josephson
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.942

6.  Central role of Boari bladder flap and downward nephropexy in upper ureteral reconstruction.

Authors:  Ryan J Mauck; Steven J Hudak; Ryan P Terlecki; Allen F Morey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Laparoscopic ureteral reconstruction for benign stricture disease.

Authors:  Matthew N Simmons; Inderbir S Gill; Amr F Fergany; Jihad H Kaouk; Mihir M Desai
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  [Cancer induction by urinary drainage or diversion through intestinal segments?].

Authors:  R Harzmann; B Kopper; P Carl
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 0.639

9.  Technical options in complex ureteral lesions: 'ureter-sparing' surgery.

Authors:  G Passerini-Glazel; A Meneghini; F Aragona; G Oliva; C Milani; F Pagano
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 20.096

10.  Outcomes of distal ureteral reconstruction through reimplantation with psoas hitch, Boari flap, or ureteroneocystostomy for benign or malignant ureteral obstruction or injury.

Authors:  Sven Wenske; Carl A Olsson; Mitchell C Benson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2013-05-02       Impact factor: 2.649

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.