Literature DB >> 2769543

In vivo transmural potential difference: an early monitor of rejection in small bowel transplantation.

M D Lee1, S D Smith, E J Yunis, M I Rowe.   

Abstract

To determine if serial measurements of transmural potential difference (TMPD) can serve as an early monitor of rejection in small bowel transplantation, three groups of rats were studied. The groups are defined as follows: (1) group 1, isolated loop (N = 5): 20 cm of distal jejunum was defunctionalized (Thiry-Vella loop); (2) group 2, isotransplant (N = 5): 20 cm of distal jejunum was isotransplanted between inbred Lewis rats, as a Thiry-Vella loop; the native bowel remained in continuity; (3) group 3, allotransplant (N = 8): allotransplantation as in group 2 but between outbred Sprague-Dawley rats. Using luminal and peritoneal electrodes, TMPD was measured serially every third day. Biopsies of the stoma were taken on the same days for histologic examination of rejection. Group 1 animals (isolated loop) did not show a significant decrease in TMPD from day 1 to day 20. Group 2 (isotransplant animals) had a significant decrease in TMPD as compared with group 1 on day 5 (P less than .01), but by day 8, TMPD returned to baseline. Biopsies in groups 1 and 2 showed no signs of rejection. Group 3 (allotransplant animals) showed a significant decrease in TMPD as compared with group 1 on day 5 (P less than .01). The severity of the histologic signs of rejection parallelled the TMPD decrease throughout the remainder of the study. Monitoring TMPD is a sensitive method of detecting early rejection in small intestine transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2769543     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3468(89)80533-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 0022-3468            Impact factor:   2.545


  4 in total

1.  Mucosal damage and recovery of the intestine after prolonged preservation and transplantation in dogs.

Authors:  I Takeyoshi; S Zhang; M Nomoto; Y Zhu; Y Kokudo; T Suzuki; N Hamada; A Nemoto; T E Starzl; S Todo
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Ultrastructural changes in the microvilli as a marker of small bowel rejection.

Authors:  A Yamataka; T Miyano; Y Kato; M Nozawa; K Sasaki
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.549

3.  Value of in vivo electrophysiological measurements to evaluate canine small bowel autotransplants.

Authors:  M A Meijssen; E Heineman; R W de Bruin; H J Veeze; J Bijman; H R de Jonge; F J ten Kate; R L Marquet; J C Molenaar
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Effect of rejection on electrophysiologic function of canine intestinal grafts: correlation with histopathology and Na-K-ATPase activity.

Authors:  I Takeyoshi; S Zhang; Y Kokudo; K Nakamura; A Ikoma; Y Zhu; T E Starzl; S Todo
Journal:  J Invest Surg       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.533

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.