| Literature DB >> 27695253 |
Rajendra V Phadke1, Suprava Naik1, Ramesh Muthu1, Gurucharan S Shetty1, Vivek Singh1, Sunil Kumar1.
Abstract
Entities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27695253 PMCID: PMC5006485 DOI: 10.4103/0976-3147.188636
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Neurosci Rural Pract ISSN: 0976-3155
Figure 1Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine. Sagittal T2-weighted (a), fat saturated T2-weighted imaging (b), showing posterior epidural cerebrospinal fluid intensity collection displacing the dura anteriorly (arrow in b). No epidural enhancement on flexion T1-weighted imaging (c). Axial T2-weighted imaging (d and e) showing anterior horn cell hyperintensity. Dura (white arrow d) is seen separating epidural cerebrospinal fluid from subarachnoid space, more clear in (e) (open arrow). Axial magnetic resonance myelography (f) showing cerebrospinal fluid intensity collection in posterior and lateral paraspinal region
Figure 2Magnetic resonance imaging of the cervical spine. (a) Sagittal T2-weighted imaging showind hyperintensity in the cervical spinal cord. Axial T2-weighted images (b and c) reveal anterior horn cell hyperintensity and the snake eye sign in the cervical spinal cord, dura is seen as thin hypointense line around the spinal cord (arrow) and cerebrospinal fluid intensity outside the dura (open arrow). No epidural enhancement in postcontrast T1-weighted imaging on flexion (d)