| Literature DB >> 27694905 |
Wantao Liu1,2, Peng Xu1, Yanjun Guo1, Yuan Lin3, Xiong Yin1,2,4, Guangshi Tang2, Meng He1,5.
Abstract
Counter electrodes (CEs) of dye-sensitized solar cells (DSCs) are usually fabricated by deposiEntities:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27694905 PMCID: PMC5046124 DOI: 10.1038/srep34596
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1SEM images and photographs of the titanium foil before (a) and after (b) the in situ growth; X-ray powder diffraction patterns of the titanium foil before (c) and after (d) the growth process.
Figure 2(a) TEM image of an exfoliation peeled off with a scalpel from the surface of the reacted Ti foil. (b) SAED pattern taken from the edge area which is pointed with an arrow in (a). HRTEM images taken from different region of the exfoliation are shown in (c) and (d). The inset in (d) is the Fourier transform (FT) of the region marked with a square.
Figure 3XPS survey spectrum (a) and core level spectra of C 1s (b), N 1s (c) and Ti 2p (d) of the surface layer grown on titanium foil.
Figure 4(a) Cyclic voltammograms of the reacted Ti foil and Pt electrodes measured at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1. (b) Cyclic voltammograms of the reacted Ti foil measured in consecutive 10 cycles at a scan rate of 50 mV s−1.
Figure 5(a) Current density−voltage (J−V) curves of the rigid DSCs with a Pt CE and a reacted Ti foil CE; (b) Electrochemical impedance spectra of DSCs using Pt (blue solid triangle) and the reacted Ti foil (black solid circle) counter electrodes measured under the illumination of simulated solar light (AM 1.5 G, 100 mW cm−2) and pink solid lines present the corresponding fitted results; (c) The fitting equivalent circuit used in the study.
Photovoltaic parameters and EIS fitting parameters of the rigid DSCs with Pt and reacted Ti foil CEs measured under simulated solar illumination of 100 mW cm−2 AM 1.5 G.
| Counter Electrode | VOC/V | JSC/mA cm−2 | FF | PCE/% | RS/Ω | RCT1/Ω | RCT2/Ω | ZN/Ω |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pt | 0.778 | 16.03 | 0.59 | 7.36 | 14.95 | 3.46 | 20.95 | 1.82 |
| Reacted Ti foil | 0.735 | 15.90 | 0.53 | 6.26 | 15.37 | 5.89 | 99.46 | 6.79 |
Figure 6Current density−voltage (J−V) curves of the rigid (a) and flexible (b) DSCs. Curves 1, 2 and 3 correspond to the devices using the reacted Ti foil, the reacted Ti foil after bending tests and the reacted Ti foil after tape tests as counter electrodes, respectively.
Photovoltaic performance of the rigid (R) and flexible (F) DSCs using the reacted titanium foil as CEs.
| Counter electrode | VOC/V | JSC/mA cm−2 | FF | PCE/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| untreated (R) | 0.735 | 15.90 | 0.53 | 6.26 |
| Bended (R) | 0.735 | 15.73 | 0.53 | 6.14 |
| Torn (R) | 0.736 | 14.92 | 0.48 | 5.27 |
| untreated (F) | 0.725 | 12.29 | 0.49 | 4.37 |
| Bended (F) | 0.715 | 12.23 | 0.48 | 4.20 |
| Torn (F) | 0.715 | 11.20 | 0.47 | 3.80 |
aR: rigid DSCs; F: flexible DSCs; untreated: the reacted Ti foil without further treatment; Bended: the reacted Ti foil was bended back and forth for 20 cycles; Torn: the reacted Ti foil was torn twice with Scotch tape.