Literature DB >> 27694468

Registered Replication Report: Study 1 From Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, & Hannon (2002).

Irene Cheung1, Lorne Campbell2, Etienne P LeBel3, Robert A Ackerman4, Bülent Aykutog˘lu5, Šteˇpán Bahník6, Jeffrey D Bowen7, Carrie A Bredow8, Christopher Bromberg7, Peter A Caprariello9, Rodrigo J Carcedo10, Kevin J Carson4, Rebecca J Cobb11, Nancy L Collins7, Conrad A Corretti4, Theresa E DiDonato12, Chelsea Ellithorpe13, Noelia Fernández-Rouco14, Paul T Fuglestad15, Rebecca M Goldberg13, Frank D Golom12, Elçin Gündog˘du-Aktürk5, Lisa B Hoplock16, Petr Houdek17, Heidi S Kane4, John S Kim18, Sue Kraus19, Christopher T Leone15, Norman P Li20, Jill M Logan11, Roanne D Millman11, Marian M Morry21, Jennifer C Pink11, Taylor Ritchey13, Lindsey M Root Luna8, H Colleen Sinclair13, Danu Anthony Stinson16, Tamara A Sucharyna21, Natasha D Tidwell19, Ahmet Uysal5, Marek Vranka22, Lauren A Winczewski7, Jose C Yong20.   

Abstract

Finkel, Rusbult, Kumashiro, and Hannon (2002, Study 1) demonstrated a causal link between subjective commitment to a relationship and how people responded to hypothetical betrayals of that relationship. Participants primed to think about their commitment to their partner (high commitment) reacted to the betrayals with reduced exit and neglect responses relative to those primed to think about their independence from their partner (low commitment). The priming manipulation did not affect constructive voice and loyalty responses. Although other studies have demonstrated a correlation between subjective commitment and responses to betrayal, this study provides the only experimental evidence that inducing changes to subjective commitment can causally affect forgiveness responses. This Registered Replication Report (RRR) meta-analytically combines the results of 16 new direct replications of the original study, all of which followed a standardized, vetted, and preregistered protocol. The results showed little effect of the priming manipulation on the forgiveness outcome measures, but it also did not observe an effect of priming on subjective commitment, so the manipulation did not work as it had in the original study. We discuss possible explanations for the discrepancy between the findings from this RRR and the original study.
© The Author(s) 2016.

Entities:  

Keywords:  commitment; preregistration; rejection; relationships; replication

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27694468     DOI: 10.1177/1745691616664694

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci        ISSN: 1745-6916


  6 in total

1.  Should social scientists be distanced from or engaged with the people they study?

Authors:  Kalonji Nzinga; David N Rapp; Christopher Leatherwood; Matthew Easterday; Leoandra Onnie Rogers; Natalie Gallagher; Douglas L Medin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The "I" in us, or the eye on us? Regulatory focus, commitment and derogation of an attractive alternative person.

Authors:  David Rodrigues; Diniz Lopes; Madoka Kumashiro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Heterogeneity of Research Results: A New Perspective From Which to Assess and Promote Progress in Psychological Science.

Authors:  Audrey Helen Linden; Johannes Hönekopp
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2021-01-05

4.  Experimental evidence that apologies promote forgiveness by communicating relationship value.

Authors:  Daniel E Forster; Joseph Billingsley; Jeni L Burnette; Debra Lieberman; Yohsuke Ohtsubo; Michael E McCullough
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A Bayesian bird's eye view of 'Replications of important results in social psychology'.

Authors:  Maarten Marsman; Felix D Schönbrodt; Richard D Morey; Yuling Yao; Andrew Gelman; Eric-Jan Wagenmakers
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Hypothesis-Testing Demands Trustworthy Data-A Simulation Approach to Inferential Statistics Advocating the Research Program Strategy.

Authors:  Antonia Krefeld-Schwalb; Erich H Witte; Frank Zenker
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-04-24
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.