Literature DB >> 27694439

Mechanisms of Insertion of dCTP and dTTP Opposite the DNA Lesion O6-Methyl-2'-deoxyguanosine by Human DNA Polymerase η.

Amitraj Patra1, Qianqian Zhang1, F Peter Guengerich2, Martin Egli3.   

Abstract

O6-Methyl-2'-deoxyguanosine (O6-MeG) is a ubiquitous DNA lesion, formed not only by xenobiotic carcinogens but also by the endogenous methylating agent S-adenosylmethionine. It can introduce mutations during DNA replication, with different DNA polymerases displaying different ratios of correct or incorrect incorporation opposite this nucleoside. Of the "translesion" Y-family human DNA polymerases (hpols), hpol η is most efficient in incorporating equal numbers of correct and incorrect C and T bases. However, the mechanistic basis for this specific yet indiscriminate activity is not known. To explore this question, we report biochemical and structural analysis of the catalytic core of hpol η. Activity assays showed the truncated form displayed similar misincorporation properties as the full-length enzyme, incorporating C and T equally and extending from both. X-ray crystal structures of both dC and dT paired with O6-MeG were solved in both insertion and extension modes. The structures revealed a Watson-Crick-like pairing between O6-MeG and 2"-deoxythymidine-5"-[(α, β)-imido]triphosphate (approximating dT) at both the insertion and extension stages with formation of two H-bonds. Conversely, both the structures with O6- MeG opposite dCTP and dC display sheared configuration of base pairs but to different degrees, with formation of two bifurcated H-bonds and two single H-bonds in the structures trapped in the insertion and extension states, respectively. The structural data are consistent with the observed tendency of hpol η to insert both dC and dT opposite the O6-MeG lesion with similar efficiencies. Comparison of the hpol η active site configurations with either O6-MeG:dC or O6-MeG:dT bound compared with the corresponding situations in structures of complexes of Sulfolobus solfataricus Dpo4, a bypass pol that favors C relative to T by a factor of ∼4, helps rationalize the more error-prone synthesis opposite the lesion by hpol η.
© 2016 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DNA damage; DNA polymerase; X-ray crystallography; enzyme kinetics; mass spectrometry (MS)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27694439      PMCID: PMC5104950          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M116.755462

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  41 in total

1.  UCSF Chimera--a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis.

Authors:  Eric F Pettersen; Thomas D Goddard; Conrad C Huang; Gregory S Couch; Daniel M Greenblatt; Elaine C Meng; Thomas E Ferrin
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  DNA adduct bypass polymerization by Sulfolobus solfataricus DNA polymerase Dpo4: analysis and crystal structures of multiple base pair substitution and frameshift products with the adduct 1,N2-ethenoguanine.

Authors:  Hong Zang; Angela K Goodenough; Jeong-Yun Choi; Adriana Irimia; Lioudmila V Loukachevitch; Ivan D Kozekov; Karen C Angel; Carmelo J Rizzo; Martin Egli; F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2005-06-17       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  DNA polymerase insertion fidelity. Gel assay for site-specific kinetics.

Authors:  M S Boosalis; J Petruska; M F Goodman
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1987-10-25       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  Structural studies of the O6meG.T interaction in the d(C-G-T-G-A-A-T-T-C-O6meG-C-G) duplex.

Authors:  D J Patel; L Shapiro; S A Kozlowski; B L Gaffney; R A Jones
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1986-03-11       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Pol kappa partially rescues MMR-dependent cytotoxicity of O6-methylguanine.

Authors:  Eliana Lupari; Ilenia Ventura; Francesca Marcon; Gabriele Aquilina; Eugenia Dogliotti; Paola Fortini
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2012-04-07

6.  SHPRH and HLTF act in a damage-specific manner to coordinate different forms of postreplication repair and prevent mutagenesis.

Authors:  Jia-Ren Lin; Michelle K Zeman; Jia-Yun Chen; Muh-Ching Yee; Karlene A Cimprich
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2011-03-10       Impact factor: 17.970

7.  Thermodynamic comparison of the base pairs formed by the carcinogenic lesion O6-methylguanine with reference both to Watson-Crick pairs and to mismatched pairs.

Authors:  B L Gaffney; R A Jones
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1989-07-11       Impact factor: 3.162

8.  Synthesis and characterization of a set of four dodecadeoxyribonucleoside undecaphosphates containing O6-methylguanine opposite adenine, cytosine, guanine, and thymine.

Authors:  B L Gaffney; L A Marky; R A Jones
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1984-11-20       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Replication of a cis-syn thymine dimer at atomic resolution.

Authors:  Hong Ling; François Boudsocq; Brian S Plosky; Roger Woodgate; Wei Yang
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-08-06       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Conformation of B-DNA containing O6-ethyl-G-C base pairs stabilized by minor groove binding drugs: molecular structure of d(CGC[e6G]AATTCGCG complexed with Hoechst 33258 or Hoechst 33342.

Authors:  M Sriram; G A van der Marel; H L Roelen; J H van Boom; A H Wang
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  4 in total

1.  Translesion synthesis of the major nitrogen mustard-induced DNA lesion by human DNA polymerase η.

Authors:  Hunmin Jung; Naveen Kumar Rayala; Seongmin Lee
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Enzymatic bypass and the structural basis of miscoding opposite the DNA adduct 1,N2-ethenodeoxyguanosine by human DNA translesion polymerase η.

Authors:  Pratibha P Ghodke; Jyotirling R Mali; Amritraj Patra; Carmelo J Rizzo; F Peter Guengerich; Martin Egli
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  The active site residues Gln55 and Arg73 play a key role in DNA damage bypass by S. cerevisiae Pol η.

Authors:  Elizaveta O Boldinova; Artem Ignatov; Andrey Kulbachinskiy; Alena V Makarova
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Deaminated purine bypass by DNA polymerase η.

Authors:  Antonina Andreeva
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  2021-04-16       Impact factor: 3.857

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.