Literature DB >> 27694376

Shift work, mental distress and job satisfaction among Palestinian nurses.

Y M Jaradat1,2, M B Nielsen3, P Kristensen4, R Bast-Pettersen4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Associations between shift work (SW) schedules, mental distress and job satisfaction have never been completely described. AIMS: To examine gender-specific associations of SW with mental distress and job satisfaction in nurses in Hebron District, Palestine, in 2012.
METHODS: Detailed information on work schedules (day versus shift), socio-demographic status, mental distress (General Health Questionnaire, GHQ-30) and job satisfaction (Generic Job Satisfaction Scale) in nurses employed in Hebron District, Palestine, was obtained through a questionnaire survey. Associations of SW and outcomes were examined by linear regression analysis.
RESULTS: Of 372 nurses eligible for the study, 309 and 338 completed surveys regarding mental distress and job satisfaction, respectively. The sample comprised 62% women and 38% men. After adjusting for covariates, women working shifts reported significantly higher levels of mean mental distress [β coefficient 3.6; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.3-7.0] compared with women working regular day shifts. Men working shifts reported significantly lower levels of job satisfaction (-3.3; 95% CI -6.2 to -0.5) than men working regular day shifts. Women reported higher levels of mental distress than men, but this was unrelated to work schedule.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, nurses working shifts reported higher levels of mental distress and lower levels of job satisfaction, although these associations were weaker when adjusted for potential covariates. There was no evidence of a gender differential in the association between SW and mental distress and job satisfaction.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gender; job satisfaction; mental distress; shift work schedule.

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27694376      PMCID: PMC5225884          DOI: 10.1093/occmed/kqw128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)        ISSN: 0962-7480            Impact factor:   1.611


Introduction

Most nurses have working hours scheduled as shift work (SW). SW is defined as organization of daily working hours where different persons or teams work in succession to cover more than the usual 8h day [1]. SW can have adverse health consequences, including mental health problems [2-5] and job dissatisfaction [3,5]. The relationship between SW and mental distress is conditioned by sex [6]. Although the number of studies on SW is increasing, little is known about the potential negative effects of SW on mental health, especially with regard to impact on mental distress in non-Western countries. Additionally, few studies have addressed gender differences associated with SW. This study examined associations between SW, mental distress and job satisfaction among Palestinian nurses, an under-researched population, in Hebron District. Due to the large proportion of male nurses in Hebron (40%), gender effects could also be studied.

Methods

The study was part of a larger study of Palestinian nurses employed at hospitals and primary health care clinics [4,7]. From October to December 2012, nurses were invited to participate in the study. The study was approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, REC South East, Norway. Demographic variables (age, sex, number of children) were collected along with job information. Work schedule was recorded with a single-item question with two response categories: ‘day work’ and ‘SW’ (rotating between day, evening, night or fixed night shifts). Mental distress was measured with the GHQ-30 (General Health Questionnaire) [8]. Responses were scored on a four-point Likert scale (values: 0–3). Higher scores indicated more mental distress. The scale ranged from 0 to 90 (Cronbach’s α = 0.90). Job satisfaction (Cronbach’s α = 0.79) was measured with the 10-item Generic Job Satisfaction Scale [9]. Responses were coded as strongly disagree (0), disagree (1), do not know (2), agree (3) and strongly agree (4). The scale ranged from 0 to 40. Higher scores indicated greater job satisfaction. Mental distress and job satisfaction scores were treated as continuous variables. Analyses were conducted with using STATA v. 10 (Stata Statistical Soft Ware, 2007). Univariate differences were analysed using analysis of variance and t-tests. Linear regression with listwise deletion was used to assess associations between SW and participant levels of mental distress and job satisfaction, adjusted for age, number of children and job position. Tests of independence, homoscedasticity, normality, outliers and collinearity indicated that the statistical assumptions for regression analyses were fulfilled. Results are expressed as coefficients (betas) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The beta coefficients represent the differences between groups. An interaction term (SW by gender) was included to examine whether SW had a differential impact for men and women. Level of statistical significance was set to P <0.05.

Results

Among the 372 nurses who were invited to participate in the study, 16 declined to participate, 10 were on leave, and two had incomplete data. Thus, 344 nurses (92.5% response rate) were included in the analysis. Table 1 shows demographic characteristics and mean levels of mental distress and job satisfaction scores by gender. Nurses working shifts reported higher mental distress and lower job satisfaction compared with non-shift workers.
Table 1.

Mental distress symptoms (n = 309) and job satisfaction scores (n = 338) by demographic characteristics, Hebron District, 2012

OutcomesFemalesMalesDifferences between females and males
n Mean95% CI n Mean95% CIMean difference95% CI
Mental distressa 19528.426.9 to 29.911425.723.4 to 28.02.70.1 to 5.3
 Work schedule
  Day work10526.524.7 to 28.24422.318.9 to 25.74.10.7 to 7.7
  SW9030.728.2 to 33.27027.924.9 to 30.92.9−1.0 to 6.7
 Age group (years)
  <303428.525.3 to 31.83027.322.3 to 32.31.2−4.5 to 6.9
  30–4512629.227.2 to 31.16525.722.5 to 28.83.5−0.1 to 7.0
  >453525.822.6 to 29.01923.318.8 to 27.82.5−2.9 to 7.9
 Number of children
  No child3526.322.2 to 30.42126.922.2 to 30.4−0.6−7.2 to 5.9
  1–3 child4928.425.2 to 31.6342419.9 to 28.24.3−0.7 to 9.5
  >3 child11129.127.2 to 31.05926.322.9 to 29.62.9−0.7 to 6.4
 Job position
  Administrative2621.819.2 to 24.4452319.8 to 26.1−1.2−5.7 to 3.3
  Non-administrative16929.527.8 to 31.16927.524.3 to 30.71.9−1.3 to 5.2
Job satisfactionb 20923.923.1 to 24.812922.721.6 to 23.91.2−0.2 to 2.6
 Work schedule
  Day work10924.823.7 to 26.04924.723.0 to 26.40.1−1.9 to 2.2
  SW1002321.8 to 24.18021.520.1 to 23.01.4−0.4 to 3.2
 Age group (years)
  <303524.923.4 to 26.43721.519.1 to 23.83.40.6 to 6.2
  30–4513623.122.1 to 24.27222.921.4 to 24.30.3−1.5 to 2.0
  >453825.923.8 to 27.92024.621.7 to 27.51.3−2.2 to 4.7
 Number of children
  No child3623.121.0 to 25.22220.317.3 to 23.42.8−0.7 to 6.3
  1–3 child5223.722.0 to 25.44121.819.5 to 24.01.9−8.0 to 4.6
  >3 child12124.323.2 to 25.36624.222.8 to 25.50.2−1.6 to 1.9
 Job position
  Administrative2724.221.1 to 27.34923.321.5 to 25.10.8−2.40 to 4.1
  Non-administrative18223.923.1 to 24.78022.420.9 to 23.81.5−0.04 to 3.1

aA lower score is a ‘better score’.

bA higher score is a ‘better score’.

Mental distress symptoms (n = 309) and job satisfaction scores (n = 338) by demographic characteristics, Hebron District, 2012 aA lower score is a ‘better score’. bA higher score is a ‘better score’. Gender-specific associations between SW, mental distress and job satisfaction from regression analysis are presented in Table 2. Adjusted for covariates, women working shifts reported significantly higher levels of mean mental distress (β coefficient 3.6; 95% CI 0.3–7.0), R 2 = 0.10 and lower job satisfaction compared with women on regular day shift but this was not significant. Men working shifts reported significantly lower job satisfaction compared with men working regular day shifts (–3.3; 95% CI –6.2 to –0.5), R 2 = 0.10. With explained variances in the range of 0.07–0.10 (Table 2), the predictor variables had limited contributions to the variance in mental distress and job satisfaction. There was no interaction between gender and SW for mental distress (β coefficient –0.03; 95% CI –5.3 to +5.3) or job satisfaction (–1.6; 95% CI –4.4 to +1.2).
Table 2.

Regression analysis of the association between mental distress, job satisfaction and SW by gender, Hebron District, 2012: β coefficients with 95% CIs

OutcomesFemalesMales
Crude modelAdjusted modela Crude modelAdjusted modela
Coefficient (95% CI)Coefficient (95% CI)Coefficient (95% CI)Coefficient (95% CI)
Mental distress R 2 = 0.10 R 2 = 0.08
F = 3.65 F = 1.54
df = 6/188 df = 6/107
 Work schedule
  SW (day work reference)4.2 (1.3 to 7.2)3.6 (0.3 to 7.0)5.6 (1.0 to 10.2)4.5 (−1.3 to 10.3)
 Age group (years)
  <300 (reference)0 (reference)0 (reference)0 (reference)
  30–450.6 (−3.4 to 4.7)0.01 (−4.4 to 4.5)−1.6 (−7.0 to 3.8)−1.5 (−8.1 to 5.2)
  >45−2.7 (−7.8 to 2.3)−1.5 (−7.2 to 4.2)−4.0 (−11.2 to 3.2)−2.7 (−11.7 to 6.2)
 Number of children
  No child0 (reference)0 (reference)0 (reference)0 (reference)
  1–3 child2.1 (−2.5 to 6.8)2.8 (−1.8 to 7.4)−2.9 (−9.7 to 4.0)−1.5 (−8.5 to 5.6)
  >3 child2.8 (−1.2 to 6.9)4.5 (0.1 to 9.0)−0.6 (−6.9 to 5.6)3.4 (−4.2 to 11.1)
 Job position
  Non-administrative (administrative reference)7.7 (3.4 to 12.0)6.2 (1.8 to 10.6)4.6 (−0.1 to 9.2)3.0 (−2.6 to 8.6)
Job satisfaction R 2 = 0.07 R 2 = 0.10
F = 2.34 F = 2.28
df = 6/202 df = 6/122
 Work schedule
  SW (day work reference)−1.9 (−3.5 to −0.3)−1.8 (−3.6 to 0.01)−3.2 (−5.4 to −0.9)−3.3 (−6.2 to −0.5)
 Age group (years)
  <300 (reference)0 (reference)0 (reference)0 (reference)
  30–45−1.8 (−4.0 to 0.4)−3.0 (−5.5 to −0.5)1.4 (−1.2 to 3.9)−0.6 (3.6 to 2.4)
  >451.0 (−1.8. to 3.7)−0.9 (−4.0 to 2.2)3.1 (−0.4 to 6.6)−0.6 (−4.8 to 3.7)
 No of children
  No child0 (reference)0 (reference)0 (reference)0 (reference)
  1–3 child0.6 (−2.0 to 3.1)1.0 (−1.6 to 3.5)1.4 (−1.8 to 4.7)1.1 (−2.2 to 4.5)
  >3 child1.2 (−1.1 to 3.4)1.6 (−0.9 to 4.1)3.8 (0.8 to 6.9)3.5 (−0.1 to 7.2)
 Job position
  Non-administrative (administrative reference)−0.3 (−2.7 to 2.2)0.5 (−2.0 to 3.0)−1 (−3.3 to 1.3)1.7 (−1.1 to 4.4)

df, degrees of freedom.

aAdjusted for age, number of children and job position.

Regression analysis of the association between mental distress, job satisfaction and SW by gender, Hebron District, 2012: β coefficients with 95% CIs df, degrees of freedom. aAdjusted for age, number of children and job position.

Discussion

Consistent with other studies, SW was associated with job satisfaction, and to a certain degree with mental distress. Few gender differences related to SW were observed, which is noteworthy since our sample included a high proportion (40%) of male nurses. Women reported more mental distress than men, but this difference was only evident for nurses working day shift. No gender difference in job satisfaction associated with SW was observed. The finding that men with SW schedules reported higher levels of distress and lower levels of job satisfaction compared with men with day work schedules is consistent with previous research findings, showing that SW has negative effects on health and well-being [2-5]. Strengths of this study include the high response rate and the large proportion of male nurses, allowing us to study gender differences, a missing component in many studies of this occupation. The predictor variables had limited contributions to the variance in outcomes. It should be noted that while the findings reach statistically significantly, the clinical significance may be restricted. In order to illustrate the clinical significance of the differences between groups, the total range of distribution of scores was calculated. Among the women, the total range of the mental distress symptoms was 9–68 regardless of shift status (not tabulated). The adjusted difference in mental distress score was 3.6, giving a difference in mental distress score of 6%. Among the men, the total range of the job satisfaction score was 6–38 (not tabulated). The adjusted difference in job satisfaction was 3.3, giving a difference representing roughly 10% lower job satisfaction associated with shift status. The cross-sectional design of the study precludes inferences of causal explanations. All data were based on self-reports, which can make results susceptible to common method bias and inflated associations [10]. The association between exposure and outcomes for non-participants is unknown, which might pose selection bias, although the response rate was high. Despite limitations, our findings indicate that SW was related to higher mental distress and lower job satisfaction in both male and female nurses, without evidence of a gender differential. Nurses with shift work schedules reported lower levels of job satisfaction than non-shift workers. Shift workers reported higher levels of mental distress than non-shift workers. There was no evidence of a gender differential in the association between shift work and mental distress and job satisfaction.

Funding

This work was funded by the Norwegian Programme for Development, Research and Education (NUFU pro x1 50/2002 and NUFUSM-2008/10232).

Conflicts of interest

None declared.
  8 in total

Review 1.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.

Authors:  Philip M Podsakoff; Scott B MacKenzie; Jeong-Yeon Lee; Nathan P Podsakoff
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2003-10

Review 2.  Workplace stress in nursing: a literature review.

Authors:  Andrew McVicar
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 3.187

Review 3.  Shift work and occupational medicine: an overview.

Authors:  Giovanni Costa
Journal:  Occup Med (Lond)       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 1.611

Review 4.  Individual differences in tolerance to shift work--a systematic review.

Authors:  Ingvild B Saksvik; Bjørn Bjorvatn; Hilde Hetland; Gro M Sandal; Ståle Pallesen
Journal:  Sleep Med Rev       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 11.609

5.  Validation of the Arabic versions of the thirty- and twelve-item General Health Questionnaires in primary care patients.

Authors:  O F el-Rufaie; T K Daradkeh
Journal:  Br J Psychiatry       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 9.319

6.  Main and interactive effects of shiftwork, age and work stress on health in an Italian sample of healthcare workers.

Authors:  P M Conway; P Campanini; S Sartori; R Dotti; G Costa
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  Working shifts and mental health--findings from the British Household Panel Survey (1995-2005).

Authors:  Ana-Claudia Bara; Sara Arber
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 5.024

8.  Psychosomatic symptoms and stressful working conditions among Palestinian nurses: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yousef Jaradat; Khaldoun Nijem; Lars Lien; Hein Stigum; Espen Bjertness; Rita Bast-Pettersen
Journal:  Contemp Nurse       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 1.787

  8 in total
  7 in total

1.  The relationship between shift work and mental health among electronics workers in South Korea: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mo-Yeol Kang; Ho-Jang Kwon; Kyung-Hwa Choi; Chung-Won Kang; Hyunjoo Kim
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  An explorative study of workplace violence against nurses who care for older people.

Authors:  Mamdouh El-Hneiti; Abeer M Shaheen; Ayman Bani Salameh; Rami Mohammad Al-Dweeri; Mahmoud Al-Hussami; Fathi Tawfiq Alfaouri; Muayyad Ahmad
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2019-10-08

3.  Effectiveness of Lifestyle Health Promotion Interventions for Nurses: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Natalia Stanulewicz; Emily Knox; Melanie Narayanasamy; Noureen Shivji; Kamlesh Khunti; Holly Blake
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Gender assessment of job stress in healthcare workers. Implications for practice.

Authors:  Gabriele D'Ettorre; Vincenza Pellicani; Annamaria Vullo
Journal:  Med Lav       Date:  2019-02-22       Impact factor: 1.275

5.  Effects of Optimism on Work Satisfaction Among Nurses: A Mediation Model Through Work-Family Conflict.

Authors:  Weiyu Zhang; Zhen Zheng; Romana Pylypchuk; Jinfeng Zhao; Kristin K Sznajder; Can Cui; Xiaoshi Yang
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 4.157

6.  The occurrence and consequences of violence against healthcare workers in Turkey: before and during the 
COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Gülin Özdamar Ünal; Gökçe İşcan; Onur Ünal
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 2.290

7.  Factors affecting nurses' intention to leave their current jobs in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdulrhman Saad Albougami; Joseph U Almazan; Jonas P Cruz; Nahed Alquwez; Majed Sulaiman Alamri; Cris A Adolfo; Mark Y Roque
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2020 May-Jun
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.