L Dupree Hatch1, Peter H Grubb2, Amanda S Lea3, William F Walsh2, Melinda H Markham2, Patrick O Maynord4, Gina M Whitney5, Ann R Stark2, E Wesley Ely6. 1. Divisions of Neonatology and leon.d.hatch@vanderbilt.edu. 2. Divisions of Neonatology and. 3. Monroe Carell Jr Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt, Nashville, Tennessee. 4. Critical Care, Department of Pediatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee. 5. Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado. 6. Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, and the Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee; and Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center (GRECC), Nashville, Tennessee.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To improve patient safety in our NICU by decreasing the incidence of intubation-associated adverse events (AEs). METHODS: We sequentially implemented and tested 3 interventions: standardized checklist for intubation, premedication algorithm, and computerized provider order entry set for intubation. We compared baseline data collected over 10 months (period 1) with data collected over a 10-month intervention and sustainment period (period 2). Outcomes were the percentage of intubations containing any prospectively defined AE and intubations with bradycardia or hypoxemia. We followed process measures for each intervention. We used risk ratios (RRs) and statistical process control methods in a times series design to assess differences between the 2 periods. RESULTS: AEs occurred in 126/273 (46%) intubations during period 1 and 85/236 (36%) intubations during period 2 (RR = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.97). Significantly fewer intubations with bradycardia (24.2% vs 9.3%, RR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25-0.61) and hypoxemia (44.3% vs 33.1%, RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.6-0.93) occurred during period 2. Using statistical process control methods, we identified 2 cases of special cause variation with a sustained decrease in AEs and bradycardia after implementation of our checklist. All process measures increased reflecting sustained improvement throughout data collection. CONCLUSIONS: Our interventions resulted in a 10% absolute reduction in AEs that was sustained. Implementation of a standardized checklist for intubation made the greatest impact, with reductions in both AEs and bradycardia.
OBJECTIVE: To improve patient safety in our NICU by decreasing the incidence of intubation-associated adverse events (AEs). METHODS: We sequentially implemented and tested 3 interventions: standardized checklist for intubation, premedication algorithm, and computerized provider order entry set for intubation. We compared baseline data collected over 10 months (period 1) with data collected over a 10-month intervention and sustainment period (period 2). Outcomes were the percentage of intubations containing any prospectively defined AE and intubations with bradycardia or hypoxemia. We followed process measures for each intervention. We used risk ratios (RRs) and statistical process control methods in a times series design to assess differences between the 2 periods. RESULTS:AEs occurred in 126/273 (46%) intubations during period 1 and 85/236 (36%) intubations during period 2 (RR = 0.78; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.97). Significantly fewer intubations with bradycardia (24.2% vs 9.3%, RR = 0.39; 95% CI, 0.25-0.61) and hypoxemia (44.3% vs 33.1%, RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.6-0.93) occurred during period 2. Using statistical process control methods, we identified 2 cases of special cause variation with a sustained decrease in AEs and bradycardia after implementation of our checklist. All process measures increased reflecting sustained improvement throughout data collection. CONCLUSIONS: Our interventions resulted in a 10% absolute reduction in AEs that was sustained. Implementation of a standardized checklist for intubation made the greatest impact, with reductions in both AEs and bradycardia.
Authors: Paul A Harris; Robert Taylor; Robert Thielke; Jonathon Payne; Nathaniel Gonzalez; Jose G Conde Journal: J Biomed Inform Date: 2008-09-30 Impact factor: 6.317
Authors: Greg Ogrinc; Louise Davies; Daisy Goodman; Paul Batalden; Frank Davidoff; David Stevens Journal: Am J Med Qual Date: 2015 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.852
Authors: Elizabeth E Foglia; Anne Ades; Taylor Sawyer; Kristen M Glass; Neetu Singh; Philipp Jung; Bin Huey Quek; Lindsay C Johnston; James Barry; Jeanne Zenge; Ahmed Moussa; Jae H Kim; Stephen D DeMeo; Natalie Napolitano; Vinay Nadkarni; Akira Nishisaki Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2018-12-11 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: L Dupree Hatch; Matthew Rivard; Joyce Bolton; Christa Sala; Wendy Araya; Melinda H Markham; Daniel J France; Peter H Grubb Journal: Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf Date: 2018-12-21
Authors: Tara J Glenn; Melissa M Grathwol; Jacquelyn D McClary; Rebecca J Wainwright; Sara M Gorman; Ashley M Rodriguez; Monika Bhola Journal: Pediatr Qual Saf Date: 2019-11-12