Literature DB >> 27694253

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy? A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of the options for neoadjuvant therapy for treating oesophageal cancer.

Han-Yu Deng1,2, Wen-Ping Wang1, Yun-Cang Wang1,2, Wei-Peng Hu1,2, Peng-Zhi Ni1,2, Yi-Dan Lin1, Long-Qi Chen1.   

Abstract

Neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery is a standard treatment for locally advanced oesophageal cancer. However, the roles of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy in treating oesophageal cancer remain controversial. In this comprehensive meta-analysis, we examine the efficacy of adding radiotherapy to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for treating oesophageal cancer as reported in qualified randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library databases, Google Scholar and the American Society of Clinical Oncology database to identify relevant studies up to 31 March 2016. Data including the pathological complete response rate, R0 resection rate and 3-year survival rate were extracted and analysed. Five qualified RCTs were included with a total of 709 patients. Meta-analysis showed that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy significantly increases the rates of pathological complete response and R0 resection in patients with oesophageal adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). However, we found a significantly increased 3-year survival rate only in oesophageal SCC patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (56.8 and 42.8%, respectively); relative risk (RR): 1.31 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10-1.58, P = 0.003]. In oesophageal adenocarcinoma patients, no significant survival benefit of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was found compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone (46.3 and 41.0%, respectively; RR: 1.13, 95% CI 0.88-1.45, P = 0.34). Our meta-analysis adds to the evidence showing that neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be the standard preoperative treatment strategy for locally advanced oesophageal SCC. For oesophageal adenocarcinoma, neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone may be the best preoperative treatment strategy to avoid the risk of adverse effects of radiotherapy.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chemoradiotherapy; Chemotherapy; Meta-analysis; Oesophageal adenocarcinoma; Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27694253     DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg        ISSN: 1010-7940            Impact factor:   4.191


  24 in total

1.  What is the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiation, and adjuvant treatment in resectable esophageal cancer?

Authors:  Nasser Altorki; Sebron Harrison
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-03

2.  Precision Surgical Therapy for Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus and Esophagogastric Junction.

Authors:  Thomas W Rice; Min Lu; Hemant Ishwaran; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2019-08-20       Impact factor: 15.609

3.  Esophageal cancer developed in a radiated field: can we reduce the risk of a poor prognosis cancer?

Authors:  Marina Schena; Angelo F Battaglia; Fernando Munoz
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Impact of CT-assessed changes in tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy on pathological response and survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sohei Matsumoto; Kohei Wakatsuki; Hiroshi Nakade; Tomohiro Kunishige; Shintaro Miyao; Akinori Tsujimoto; Takanari Tatsumi; Masayuki Sho
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  The Impact of Tumor Regression on Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Surgically Treated Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  D J Crull; M C H Hogenes; R Hoekstra; E M Hendriksen; M J van Det; E A Kouwenhoven
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-01-29       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  EZH2 regulates a SETDB1/ΔNp63α axis via RUNX3 to drive a cancer stem cell phenotype in squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Seamus Balinth; Matthew L Fisher; Yon Hwangbo; Caizhi Wu; Carlos Ballon; Xueqin Sun; Alea A Mills
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 8.756

Review 7.  Comparison of neoadjuvant regimens for resectable gastroesophageal junction cancer: a systematic review of randomized clinical trials across three decades.

Authors:  Go Nishikawa; Pratyusha Banik; Rajat Thawani; Adel Kardosh; Stephanie G Wood; Nima Nabavizadeh; Emerson Y Chen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-06

8.  Cancerous esophageal stenosis before treatment was significantly correlated to poor prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Han-Yu Deng; Guha Alai; Jun Luo; Gang Li; Ze-Guo Zhuo; Yi-Dan Lin
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched study from the National Cancer Center in China.

Authors:  Guochao Zhang; Chaoqi Zhang; Nan Sun; Liyan Xue; Zhaoyang Yang; Lingling Fang; Zhihui Zhang; Yuejun Luo; Shugeng Gao; Qi Xue; Juwei Mu; Yushun Gao; Fengwei Tan; Jie He
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  A validated nomogram integrating hematological indicators to predict response to neoadjuvant therapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Sichao Wang; Zihao Zhou; Dan Tian; Shujie Huang; Ce Wang; Zhen Gao; Xiaosong Ben; Jiming Tang; Liang Xie; Haiyu Zhou; Dongkun Zhang; Ruiqing Shi; Cheng Deng; Weitao Zhuang; Yu Ding; Guibin Qiao
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.