Christine M Mitchell1, Zachary D Epstein-Peterson2, Julia Bandini3, Ada Amobi4, Jonathan Cahill5, Andrea Enzinger6, Sarah Noveroske7, John Peteet8, Tracy Balboni9, Michael J Balboni10. 1. Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA. 3. Department of Sociology, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA. 4. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 5. Theology Department, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, USA. 6. Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 7. Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 8. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 9. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 10. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. Electronic address: Michael_Balboni@dfci.harvard.edu.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Although many studies have addressed the integration of a religion and/or spirituality curriculum into medical school training, few describe the process of curriculum development based on qualitative data from students and faculty. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of medical students and chaplaincy trainees regarding the development of a curriculum to facilitate reflection on moral and spiritual dimensions of caring for the critically ill and to train students in self-care practices that promote professionalism. METHODS: Research staff conducted semiscripted and one-on-one interviews and focus groups. Respondents also completed a short and self-reported demographic questionnaire. Participants included 44 students and faculty members from Harvard Medical School and Harvard Divinity School, specifically senior medical students and divinity school students who have undergone chaplaincy training. RESULTS: Two major qualitative themes emerged: curriculum format and curriculum content. Inter-rater reliability was high (kappa = 0.75). With regard to curriculum format, most participants supported the curriculum being longitudinal, elective, and experiential. With regard to curriculum content, five subthemes emerged: personal religious and/or spiritual (R/S) growth, professional integration of R/S values, addressing patient needs, structural and/or institutional dynamics within the health care system, and controversial social issues. CONCLUSION: Qualitative findings of this study suggest that development of a future medical school curriculum on R/S and wellness should be elective, longitudinal, and experiential and should focus on the impact and integration of R/S values and self-care practices within self, care for patients, and the medical team. Future research is necessary to study the efficacy of these curricula once implemented.
CONTEXT: Although many studies have addressed the integration of a religion and/or spirituality curriculum into medical school training, few describe the process of curriculum development based on qualitative data from students and faculty. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study is to explore the perspectives of medical students and chaplaincy trainees regarding the development of a curriculum to facilitate reflection on moral and spiritual dimensions of caring for the critically ill and to train students in self-care practices that promote professionalism. METHODS: Research staff conducted semiscripted and one-on-one interviews and focus groups. Respondents also completed a short and self-reported demographic questionnaire. Participants included 44 students and faculty members from Harvard Medical School and Harvard Divinity School, specifically senior medical students and divinity school students who have undergone chaplaincy training. RESULTS: Two major qualitative themes emerged: curriculum format and curriculum content. Inter-rater reliability was high (kappa = 0.75). With regard to curriculum format, most participants supported the curriculum being longitudinal, elective, and experiential. With regard to curriculum content, five subthemes emerged: personal religious and/or spiritual (R/S) growth, professional integration of R/S values, addressing patient needs, structural and/or institutional dynamics within the health care system, and controversial social issues. CONCLUSION: Qualitative findings of this study suggest that development of a future medical school curriculum on R/S and wellness should be elective, longitudinal, and experiential and should focus on the impact and integration of R/S values and self-care practices within self, care for patients, and the medical team. Future research is necessary to study the efficacy of these curricula once implemented.
Authors: Michael K Kearney; Radhule B Weininger; Mary L S Vachon; Richard L Harrison; Balfour M Mount Journal: JAMA Date: 2009-03-18 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Giancarlo Lucchetti; Alessandra Lamas Granero Lucchetti; Daniele Corcioli Mendes Espinha; Leandro Romani de Oliveira; José Roberto Leite; Harold G Koenig Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2012-08-18 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Lindsy Desmet; Jessie Dezutter; Anne Vandenhoeck; Annemie Dillen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2022-03-23 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Sandra Kemp; Wendy Hu; Jo Bishop; Kirsty Forrest; Judith N Hudson; Ian Wilson; Andrew Teodorczuk; Gary D Rogers; Chris Roberts; Andy Wearn Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2019-03-04 Impact factor: 2.463