Literature DB >> 27693690

Targeted proteomics effectively quantifies differences between native lung and detergent-decellularized lung extracellular matrices.

Elizabeth A Calle1, Ryan C Hill2, Katherine L Leiby3, Andrew V Le4, Ashley L Gard5, Joseph A Madri6, Kirk C Hansen7, Laura E Niklason8.   

Abstract

Extracellular matrix is a key component of many products in regenerative medicine. Multiple regenerative medicine products currently in the clinic are comprised of human or xenogeneic extracellular matrix. In addition, whole-organ regeneration exploits decellularized native organs as scaffolds for organotypic cell culture. However, precise understanding of the constituents of such extracellular matrix-based implants and scaffolds has sorely lagged behind their use. We present here an advanced protein extraction method using known quantities of proteotypic 13C-labeled peptides to quantify matrix proteins in native and decellularized lung tissues. Using quantitative proteomics that produce picomole-level measurements of a large number of matrix proteins, we show that a mild decellularization technique ("Triton/SDC") results in near-native retention of laminins, proteoglycans, and other basement membrane and ECM-associated proteins. Retention of these biologically important glycoproteins and proteoglycans is quantified to be up to 27-fold higher in gently-decellularized lung scaffolds compared to scaffolds generated using a previously published decellularization regimen. Cells seeded onto this new decellularized matrix also proliferate robustly, showing positive staining for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). The high fidelity of the gently decellularized scaffold as compared to the original lung extracellular matrix represents an important step forward in the ultimate recapitulation of whole organs using tissue-engineering techniques. This method of ECM and scaffold protein analysis allows for better understanding, and ultimately quality control, of matrices that are used for tissue engineering and human implantation. These results should advance regenerative medicine in general, and whole organ regeneration in particular. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The extracellular matrix (ECM) in large part defines the biochemical and mechanical properties of tissues and organs; these inherent cues make acellular ECM scaffolds potent substrates for tissue regeneration. As such, they are increasingly prevalent in the clinic and the laboratory. However, the exact composition of these scaffolds has been difficult to ascertain. This paper uses targeted proteomics to definitively quantify 71 proteins present in acellular lung ECM scaffolds. We use this technique to compare two decellularization methods and demonstrate superior retention of ECM proteins important for cell adhesion, migration, proliferation, and differentiation in scaffolds treated with low-concentration detergent solutions. In the long term, the ability to acquire quantitative biochemical data about biological substrates will facilitate the rational design of engineered tissues and organs based on precise cell-matrix interactions.
Copyright © 2016 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decellularization; Extracellular matrix; Quantitative proteomics; Regenerative medicine; Tissue engineering

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27693690      PMCID: PMC5451113          DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.09.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biomater        ISSN: 1742-7061            Impact factor:   8.947


  39 in total

Review 1.  The extracellular matrix of the gastrointestinal tract: a regenerative medicine platform.

Authors:  George S Hussey; Timothy J Keane; Stephen F Badylak
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Matrix biomechanics and dynamics in pulmonary fibrosis.

Authors:  Andrew J Haak; Qi Tan; Daniel J Tschumperlin
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 11.583

Review 3.  Bioengineering the Blood-gas Barrier.

Authors:  Katherine L Leiby; Micha Sam Brickman Raredon; Laura E Niklason
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 9.090

Review 4.  Proteomics, Glycomics, and Glycoproteomics of Matrisome Molecules.

Authors:  Rekha Raghunathan; Manveen K Sethi; Joshua A Klein; Joseph Zaia
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 5.  Tissue-informed engineering strategies for modeling human pulmonary diseases.

Authors:  Kolene E Bailey; Michael L Floren; Tyler J D'Ovidio; Steven R Lammers; Kurt R Stenmark; Chelsea M Magin
Journal:  Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol       Date:  2018-11-21       Impact factor: 5.464

Review 6.  Extracellular matrix in lung development, homeostasis and disease.

Authors:  Yong Zhou; Jeffrey C Horowitz; Alexandra Naba; Namasivayam Ambalavanan; Kamran Atabai; Jenna Balestrini; Peter B Bitterman; Richard A Corley; Bi-Sen Ding; Adam J Engler; Kirk C Hansen; James S Hagood; Farrah Kheradmand; Qing S Lin; Enid Neptune; Laura Niklason; Luis A Ortiz; William C Parks; Daniel J Tschumperlin; Eric S White; Harold A Chapman; Victor J Thannickal
Journal:  Matrix Biol       Date:  2018-03-08       Impact factor: 11.583

7.  Simulation of ECM with Silk and Chitosan Nanocomposite Materials.

Authors:  Z Z Ding; J Ma; W He; Z L Ge; Q Lu; D L Kaplan
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2017-05-16       Impact factor: 6.331

8.  Laminin-driven Epac/Rap1 regulation of epithelial barriers on decellularized matrix.

Authors:  Bethany M Young; Keerthana Shankar; Cindy K Tho; Amanda R Pellegrino; Rebecca L Heise
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Characterization and in vivo study of decellularized aortic scaffolds using closed sonication system.

Authors:  Aqilah Hazwani; Munirah Sha'Ban; Azran Azhim
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2019-09-07       Impact factor: 2.500

10.  Comparative proteomic analyses of human adipose extracellular matrices decellularized using alternative procedures.

Authors:  Caasy Thomas-Porch; Jie Li; Fabiana Zanata; Elizabeth C Martin; Nicholas Pashos; Kaylynn Genemaras; J Nicholas Poche; Nicholas P Totaro; Melyssa R Bratton; Dina Gaupp; Trivia Frazier; Xiying Wu; Lydia Masako Ferreira; Weidong Tian; Guangdi Wang; Bruce A Bunnell; Lauren Flynn; Daniel Hayes; Jeffrey M Gimble
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.396

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.