A C Moore1, D L Burris2. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA. 2. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA; Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA. Electronic address: dlburris@udel.edu.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: During exercise, cartilage recovers interstitial fluid lost during inactivity, which explains how tissue thickness and joint space are maintained over time. This recovery phenomenon is currently explained by a combination of osmotic swelling during intermittent bath exposure and sub-ambient pressurization during unloading. This paper tests an alternate hypothesis that cartilage can retain and recover interstitial fluid in the absence of bath exposure and unloading when physiological hydrodynamics are present. METHOD: Stationary cartilage-on-flat experiments were conducted to eliminate intermittent bath exposure as a potential contributor to fluid uptake. In situ compression measurements were used to monitor the loss, retention, and recovery of interstitial fluid during testing in saline. Samples were left larger than the contact area to preserve a convergence zone for hydrodynamic pressurization. RESULTS: Interstitial fluid lost during static loading was recovered during sliding in the absence of unloading and contact migration; fluid recovery in a stationary contact cannot be explained by biphasic theory and suggests a fundamentally new contributor to the recovery process. We call the phenomenon 'tribological rehydration' because recovery was induced by sliding rather than by unloading or migration. Sensitivities to sliding speed, surface permeability, and nature of the convergence wedge are consistent with the hypothesis that hydrodynamic effects underlie the tribological rehydration phenomenon. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that cartilage can retain and recover interstitial fluid without migration or unloading. The results suggest that hydrodynamic effects in the joint are not only important contributors to lubrication, they are likely equally important to the preservation of joint space.
OBJECTIVE: During exercise, cartilage recovers interstitial fluid lost during inactivity, which explains how tissue thickness and joint space are maintained over time. This recovery phenomenon is currently explained by a combination of osmotic swelling during intermittent bath exposure and sub-ambient pressurization during unloading. This paper tests an alternate hypothesis that cartilage can retain and recover interstitial fluid in the absence of bath exposure and unloading when physiological hydrodynamics are present. METHOD: Stationary cartilage-on-flat experiments were conducted to eliminate intermittent bath exposure as a potential contributor to fluid uptake. In situ compression measurements were used to monitor the loss, retention, and recovery of interstitial fluid during testing in saline. Samples were left larger than the contact area to preserve a convergence zone for hydrodynamic pressurization. RESULTS: Interstitial fluid lost during static loading was recovered during sliding in the absence of unloading and contact migration; fluid recovery in a stationary contact cannot be explained by biphasic theory and suggests a fundamentally new contributor to the recovery process. We call the phenomenon 'tribological rehydration' because recovery was induced by sliding rather than by unloading or migration. Sensitivities to sliding speed, surface permeability, and nature of the convergence wedge are consistent with the hypothesis that hydrodynamic effects underlie the tribological rehydration phenomenon. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that cartilage can retain and recover interstitial fluid without migration or unloading. The results suggest that hydrodynamic effects in the joint are not only important contributors to lubrication, they are likely equally important to the preservation of joint space.
Authors: Elizabeth Feeney; Bridgette T Peal; Jacqueline E Inglis; Jin Su; Alan J Nixon; Lawrence J Bonassar; Heidi L Reesink Journal: J Orthop Res Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 3.494
Authors: Nicholas L Cuccia; Suraj Pothineni; Brady Wu; Joshua Méndez Harper; Justin C Burton Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 11.205