Literature DB >> 2769345

Binocular interactions in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. I. Spatial-frequency analysis of responses of X, Y, and W cells to nondominant-eye stimulation.

W Guido1, N Tumosa, P D Spear.   

Abstract

1. X, Y, and W cells in the A and C layers of the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN) were tested for responses to stimulation of the nondominant eye. The main purpose was to determine the incidence of nondominant-eye excitation and inhibition among different classes of cells and to examine the spatial-frequency tuning of responses to the nondominant eye. 2. Of 198 cells that were tested with drifting sine-wave gratings presented to the nondominant eye, 109 (55%) showed statistically significant responses. Four types of responses were observed: an increase in the mean discharge rate (F0 excitation), a decrease in the mean discharge rate (F0 inhibition), an increased modulation at the fundamental frequency of the grating (F1 excitation), and a decreased modulation at the fundamental frequency of the grating (F1 inhibition). Overall, 29% of the cells responded with inhibition, 24% responded with excitation, and 2% showed both excitation and inhibition, depending upon the spatial frequency and/or the harmonic response component. The relative incidence of excitation and inhibition was similar for X, Y, and W cells, for cells with on-center and off-center receptive fields, for cells with different receptive-field eccentricities, and for cells in each LGN layer. In addition, within layers A and A1, responses were similar for cells at different distances from the laminar borders. 3. Spatial-frequency response functions indicated that cells could have band-pass or low-pass spatial-frequency tuning through the nondominant eye. Band-pass cells tended to be narrowly tuned (less than or equal to 1 octave), and low-pass cells responded to a broader range of spatial frequencies. These properties were similar for X, Y, and W cells. Spatial resolution tended to be low (less than or equal to 0.8 c/deg for most cells), although a few cells responded to the highest spatial frequency tested (5.4 c/deg). Likewise, optimal spatial frequency was low (less than or equal to 0.2 c/deg) for most cells. These properties were similar for X and Y cells, and there was a weak tendency for X and Y cells to have higher optimal spatial frequencies and spatial resolutions than W cells. 4. In terms of absolute change in activity, responses to drifting gratings were weak. However, cells that were inhibited generally showed 20-60% decreases in activity to the optimal spatial frequency, and cells that were excited generally showed 40-100% increases. Response amplitudes were similar for X, Y, and W cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2769345     DOI: 10.1152/jn.1989.62.2.526

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  12 in total

1.  Comparison of the laminar distribution of input from areas 17 and 18 of the visual cortex to the lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat.

Authors:  P C Murphy; S G Duckett; A M Sillito
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Binocular visual responses in cells of the rat dLGN.

Authors:  Kenneth L Grieve
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Binocular processing in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. III. Spatial frequency, orientation, and direction sensitivity of nondominant-eye influences.

Authors:  R J Moore; P D Spear; C B Kim; J T Xue
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Correlation-based development of ocularly matched orientation and ocular dominance maps: determination of required input activities.

Authors:  E Erwin; K D Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 5.  Development, form, and function of the mouse visual thalamus.

Authors:  William Guido
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Non-dominant suppression in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: laminar differences and class specificity.

Authors:  C Wang; B Dreher; W Burke
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Binocular combination of luminance profiles.

Authors:  Jian Ding; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Synaptic organization of thalamocortical axon collaterals in the perigeniculate nucleus and dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Martha E Bickford; Haiyang Wei; Michael A Eisenback; Ranida D Chomsung; Arkadiusz S Slusarczyk; Aygul B Dankowsi
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 3.215

9.  Noradrenergic modulation of retinogeniculate transmission in the cat.

Authors:  K Funke; H C Pape; U T Eysel
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 10.  Binocular response modulation in the lateral geniculate nucleus.

Authors:  Kacie Dougherty; Michael C Schmid; Alexander Maier
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.215

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.