Literature DB >> 27693448

PTEN Loss in Gleason Score 3 + 4 = 7 Prostate Biopsies is Associated with Nonorgan Confined Disease at Radical Prostatectomy.

Liana B Guedes1, Jeffrey J Tosoian2, Jessica Hicks1, Ashley E Ross3, Tamara L Lotan4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Men with intermediate risk prostate cancer have widely variable outcomes. Some suggest that active surveillance or less invasive therapies (brachytherapy or focal therapy) may be appropriate for some men with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 disease. Molecular markers may help further distinguish prostate cancers with aggressive behavior. We tested whether loss of the PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog) tumor suppressor in 3 + 4 = 7 tumor biopsies is associated with adverse pathology at prostatectomy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We queried prostate needle biopsies from 2000 to 2014 with a maximum Gleason score of 3 + 4 = 7 followed by prostatectomy. A total of 260 cases had PTEN status evaluable by clinical grade immunohistochemistry. Biopsy PTEN status was correlated with preoperative and postoperative clinicopathological parameters.
RESULTS: PTEN loss was detected in 27% of 3 + 4 = 7 biopsies. Loss of PTEN was less common in tumors of African American men compared to European American men (9% vs 31%, p = 0.002). At prostatectomy, tumors with PTEN loss were more likely to show nonorgan confined disease compared to those with PTEN intact (52% vs 27%, p <0.001). In logistic regression models including age, race, prostate specific antigen, clinical stage and biopsy tumor involvement, PTEN loss at biopsy remained significantly associated with an increased risk of nonorgan confined disease (HR 2.46, 95% CI 1.34-4.49, p = 0.004). On ROC analysis, the AUC for models including prostate specific antigen and clinical stage was increased from 0.61 to 0.67 upon inclusion of PTEN status.
CONCLUSIONS: PTEN loss in a Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 biopsy is independently associated with an increased risk of nonorgan confined disease at prostatectomy. It adds to the preoperative parameters commonly used to predict pathological stage.
Copyright © 2017 American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PTEN protein; adenocarcinoma; biopsy; human; neoplasm grading; prostatic neoplasms

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27693448     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.09.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of prostate cancer in Middle Eastern population highlights differences with Western populations with prognostic implication.

Authors:  Ramy A Abdelsalam; Ibrahim Khalifeh; Alan Box; Maria Kalantarian; Sunita Ghosh; Hatem Abou-Ouf; Tamara Lotfi; Mohammed Shahait; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 2.  Molecular correlates of intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Huihui Ye; Adam G Sowalsky
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 3.  Clinical implications of PTEN loss in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Tamara Jamaspishvili; David M Berman; Ashley E Ross; Howard I Scher; Angelo M De Marzo; Jeremy A Squire; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Loss of KLK4::KLKP1 pseudogene expression by RNA chromogenic in-situ hybridization is associated with PTEN loss and increased risk of biochemical recurrence in a cohort of middle eastern men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Andrea Bakker; Jonathan C Slack; Nalla Palanisamy; Shannon Carskadon; Sunita Ghosh; Ibrahim Khalifeh; Tarek A Bismar
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 4.322

5.  Clinical utility of assessing PTEN and ERG protein expression in prostate cancer patients: a proposed method for risk stratification.

Authors:  Tarek A Bismar; Samar Hegazy; Zhaoyong Feng; Darryl Yu; Bryan Donnelly; Nallasivam Palanisamy; Bruce J Trock
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-08-12       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Somatic molecular subtyping of prostate tumors from HOXB13 G84E carriers.

Authors:  Tamara L Lotan; Alba Torres; Miao Zhang; Jeffrey J Tosoian; Liana B Guedes; Helen Fedor; Jessica Hicks; Charles M Ewing; Sarah D Isaacs; Dorhyun Johng; Angelo M De Marzo; William B Isaacs
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-04-04

Review 7.  If this is true, what does it imply? How end-user antibody validation facilitates insights into biology and disease.

Authors:  Karen S Sfanos; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian; William G Nelson; Tamara L Lotan; Ibrahim Kulac; Jessica L Hicks; Qizhi Zheng; Charles J Bieberich; Michael C Haffner; Angelo M De Marzo
Journal:  Asian J Urol       Date:  2018-12-12

Review 8.  Targeted Prostate Biopsy in the Era of Active Surveillance.

Authors:  Fuad F Elkhoury; Demetrios N Simopoulos; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 2.633

9.  The Role of Immunohistochemical Analysis as a Tool for the Diagnosis, Prognostic Evaluation and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Arie Carneiro; Álan Roger Gomes Barbosa; Lucas Seiti Takemura; Paulo Priante Kayano; Natasha Kouvaleski Saviano Moran; Carolina Ko Chen; Marcelo Langer Wroclawski; Gustavo Caserta Lemos; Isabela Werneck da Cunha; Marcos Takeo Obara; Marcos Tobias-Machado; Adam G Sowalsky; Bianca Bianco
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 6.244

10.  PTEN status assessment in the Johns Hopkins active surveillance cohort.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Tosoian; Liana B Guedes; Carlos L Morais; Mufaddal Mamawala; Ashley E Ross; Angelo M De Marzo; Bruce J Trock; Misop Han; H Ballentine Carter; Tamara L Lotan
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 5.554

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.