Literature DB >> 27693437

Parkinson's disease classification using gait analysis via deterministic learning.

Wei Zeng1, Fenglin Liu2, Qinghui Wang2, Ying Wang2, Limin Ma3, Yu Zhang3.   

Abstract

Gait analysis plays an important role in maintaining the well-being of human mobility and health care, and is a valuable tool for obtaining quantitative information on motor deficits in Parkinson's disease (PD). In this paper, we propose a method to classify (diagnose) patients with PD and healthy control subjects using gait analysis via deterministic learning theory. The classification approach consists of two phases: a training phase and a classification phase. In the training phase, gait characteristics represented by the gait dynamics are derived from the vertical ground reaction forces under the usual and self-selected paces of the subjects. The gait dynamics underlying gait patterns of healthy controls and PD patients are locally accurately approximated by radial basis function (RBF) neural networks. The obtained knowledge of approximated gait dynamics is stored in constant RBF networks. The gait patterns of healthy controls and PD patients constitute a training set. In the classification phase, a bank of dynamical estimators is constructed for all the training gait patterns. Prior knowledge of gait dynamics represented by the constant RBF networks is embedded in the estimators. By comparing the set of estimators with a test gait pattern of a certain PD patient to be classified (diagnosed), a set of classification errors are generated. The average L1 norms of the errors are taken as the classification measure between the dynamics of the training gait patterns and the dynamics of the test PD gait pattern according to the smallest error principle. When the gait patterns of 93 PD patients and 73 healthy controls are classified with five-fold cross-validation method, the accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of the results are 96.39%, 96.77% and 95.89%, respectively. Based on the results, it may be claimed that the features and the classifiers used in the present study could effectively separate the gait patterns between the groups of PD patients and healthy controls.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Deterministic learning; Gait analysis; Ground reaction force; Movement disorders; Parkinson's disease (PD)

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27693437     DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.09.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosci Lett        ISSN: 0304-3940            Impact factor:   3.046


  6 in total

1.  Parkinson's Disease Detection from Resting-State EEG Signals Using Common Spatial Pattern, Entropy, and Machine Learning Techniques.

Authors:  Majid Aljalal; Saeed A Aldosari; Khalil AlSharabi; Akram M Abdurraqeeb; Fahd A Alturki
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-20

2.  Relationship between Gait Parameters and Postural Stability in Early and Late Parkinson's Disease and Visual Feedback-Based Balance Training Effects.

Authors:  Mohieldin M Ahmed; Douaa M Mosalem; Aziz K Alfeeli; Ayyoub B Baqer; Doaa Youssry Soliman
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2017-04-08

3.  Kinematic and Kinetic Patterns Related to Free-Walking in Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Martín Martínez; Federico Villagra; Juan Manuel Castellote; María A Pastor
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2018-12-01       Impact factor: 3.576

4.  Explaining the unique nature of individual gait patterns with deep learning.

Authors:  Fabian Horst; Sebastian Lapuschkin; Wojciech Samek; Klaus-Robert Müller; Wolfgang I Schöllhorn
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Resting-state electroencephalography based deep-learning for the detection of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Mohamed Shaban; Amy W Amara
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-02-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  GaiTRec, a large-scale ground reaction force dataset of healthy and impaired gait.

Authors:  Brian Horsak; Djordje Slijepcevic; Anna-Maria Raberger; Caterine Schwab; Marianne Worisch; Matthias Zeppelzauer
Journal:  Sci Data       Date:  2020-05-12       Impact factor: 6.444

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.