Hope Foley1, Amie Steel2. 1. Endeavour College of Natural Health, 2/269 Wickham St., Fortitude Valley, QLD, 4006, Australia. Electronic address: 234782@eweb.endeavour.edu.au. 2. Endeavour College of Natural Health, 2/269 Wickham St., Fortitude Valley, QLD, 4006, Australia; Australian Research Centre in Complementary and Integrative Medicine, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 15 Broadway, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This review aims to describe the prevalence of empathy, empowerment and patient-centred clinical care experienced by patients in complementary medicine (CM) consultations. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken of original research exploring patient perceptions of CM clinical care. Ten databases were searched: Alt HealthWatch, AMED, CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE Complete, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Proquest Medical Collection, PsycInfo, Social Sciences Citation Index and Psychology Collection. Studies were included which reported patient perceptions of consultation with CM practitioners and were excluded where experimental methods controlled the nature of consultation processes. RESULTS: Findings of included studies (n=34) were categorised under the a priori themes of empathy, empowerment and patient-centred care. This produced a substantial pool of qualitative data detailing patient-reported experiences which consistently confirmed occurrence of these themes in CM consultation. Quantitative data was correlative, yet was insufficient to definitively describe prevalence of such experiences. CONCLUSION: While it is evident that CM consultations provide a patient experience of empathy, empowerment and patient-centredness, further research is warranted to quantify this experience before it can be defined as characteristic of CM clinical care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This review draws attention to the potential role of CM as a resource for patients' psychosocial health needs.
OBJECTIVE: This review aims to describe the prevalence of empathy, empowerment and patient-centred clinical care experienced by patients in complementary medicine (CM) consultations. METHODS: A systematic review was undertaken of original research exploring patient perceptions of CM clinical care. Ten databases were searched: Alt HealthWatch, AMED, CINAHL Plus, MEDLINE Complete, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Proquest Medical Collection, PsycInfo, Social Sciences Citation Index and Psychology Collection. Studies were included which reported patient perceptions of consultation with CM practitioners and were excluded where experimental methods controlled the nature of consultation processes. RESULTS: Findings of included studies (n=34) were categorised under the a priori themes of empathy, empowerment and patient-centred care. This produced a substantial pool of qualitative data detailing patient-reported experiences which consistently confirmed occurrence of these themes in CM consultation. Quantitative data was correlative, yet was insufficient to definitively describe prevalence of such experiences. CONCLUSION: While it is evident that CM consultations provide a patient experience of empathy, empowerment and patient-centredness, further research is warranted to quantify this experience before it can be defined as characteristic of CM clinical care. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This review draws attention to the potential role of CM as a resource for patients' psychosocial health needs.
Authors: Felicity L Bishop; Romy Lauche; Holger Cramer; Jonquil W Pinto; Brenda Leung; Helen Hall; Matthew Leach; Vincent Ch Chung; Tobias Sundberg; Yan Zhang; Amie Steel; Lesley Ward; David Sibbritt; Jon Adams Journal: Medicina (Kaunas) Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 2.430
Authors: Stacie A Salsbury; Elissa Twist; Robert B Wallace; Robert D Vining; Christine M Goertz; Cynthia R Long Journal: Pilot Feasibility Stud Date: 2022-01-14
Authors: Amie Steel; Rebecca Redmond; Janet Schloss; Holger Cramer; Joshua Goldenberg; Matthew J Leach; Joanna Elizabeth Harnett; Claudine Van de Venter; Andy McLintock; Ryan Bradley; Jason Hawrelak; Kieran Cooley; Brenda Leung; Jon Adams; Jon Wardle Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-07-25 Impact factor: 3.006