Literature DB >> 27693102

Reconstructing ERP amplitude effects after compensating for trial-to-trial latency jitter: A solution based on a novel application of residue iteration decomposition.

Guang Ouyang1, Werner Sommer2, Changsong Zhou3.   

Abstract

Stimulus-locked averaged event-related potentials (ERPs) are among the most frequently used signals in Cognitive Neuroscience. However, the late, cognitive or endogenous ERP components are often variable in latency from trial to trial in a component-specific way, compromising the stability assumption underlying the averaging scheme. Here we show that trial-to-trial latency variability of ERP components not only blurs the average ERP waveforms, but may also attenuate existing or artificially induce condition effects in amplitude. Hitherto this problem has not been well investigated. To tackle this problem, a method to measure and compensate component-specific trial-to-trial latency variability is required. Here we first systematically analyze the problem of single trial latency variability for condition effects based on simulation. Then, we introduce a solution by applying residue iteration decomposition (RIDE) to experimental data. RIDE separates different clusters of ERP components according to their time-locking to stimulus onsets, response times, or neither, based on an algorithm of iterative subtraction. We suggest to reconstruct ERPs by re-aligning the component clusters to their most probable single trial latencies. We demonstrate that RIDE-reconstructed ERPs may recover amplitude effects that are diminished or exaggerated in conventional averages by trial-to-trial latency jitter. Hence, RIDE-corrected ERPs may be a valuable tool in conditions where ERP effects may be compromised by latency variability.
Copyright © 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ERP; Latency correction; Latency variability; Method; Residue iteration decomposition

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27693102     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2016.09.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol        ISSN: 0167-8760            Impact factor:   2.997


  7 in total

1.  A validation of Emotiv EPOC Flex saline for EEG and ERP research.

Authors:  Nikolas S Williams; Genevieve M McArthur; Bianca de Wit; George Ibrahim; Nicholas A Badcock
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 2.984

2.  Changepoint Detection in Noisy Data Using a Novel Residuals Permutation-Based Method (RESPERM): Benchmarking and Application to Single Trial ERPs.

Authors:  Werner Sommer; Katarzyna Stapor; Grzegorz Kończak; Krzysztof Kotowski; Piotr Fabian; Jeremi Ochab; Anna Bereś; Grażyna Ślusarczyk
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-04-21

3.  Functional Dissociation of Latency-Variable, Stimulus- and Response-Locked Target P3 Sub-components in Task-Switching.

Authors:  Christopher R Brydges; Francisco Barceló
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Compensation of Trial-to-Trial Latency Jitter Reveals the Parietal Retrieval Success Effect to be Both Variable and Thresholded in Older Adults.

Authors:  Jamie G Murray; Guang Ouyang; David I Donaldson
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 5.750

5.  Reduced visual evoked potential amplitude in autism spectrum disorder, a variability effect?

Authors:  Klara Kovarski; Joëlle Malvy; Raoul K Khanna; Sophie Arsène; Magali Batty; Marianne Latinus
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 6.222

6.  Studying brain activity during word-by-word interactions using wireless EEG.

Authors:  Tatiana Goregliad Fjaellingsdal; Diana Schwenke; Esther Ruigendijk; Stefan Scherbaum; Martin Georg Bleichner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-03-24       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  The role of hippocampal theta oscillations in working memory impairment in multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Lars Costers; Jeroen Van Schependom; Jorne Laton; Johan Baijot; Martin Sjøgård; Vincent Wens; Xavier De Tiège; Serge Goldman; Miguel D'Haeseleer; Marie Beatrice D'hooghe; Mark Woolrich; Guy Nagels
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-11-28       Impact factor: 5.038

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.